• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Which Headers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BLAKDOUT
  • Start date Start date Dec 25, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

1hOtStAnG

New Member
Jan 21, 2008
39
0
0
Jan 6, 2009
#21
  • Jan 6, 2009
  • #21
da vette guy said:
Just wondering, looking on the kenne bell website 3v tech tips they say there is no horse power gain in the exhaust up to 700 plus rear wheel horse power and they challenge any exhaust maker to prove a real gain on their dyno. except for sound is it worth it?
Click to expand...

Installing LT headers will definitely provide a power increase. There is a vid on youtube with JDM installing Kooks on a s/c mustang and it gained over 30rwhp. Now, having said all that, I don't feel the cost is worth the hp gains.

A set of Kooks, plus the 6 hours bay time for install, and I'm looking at probably close to $2,000 for a 30rwhp gain. That ratio of cost to power gains really sucks.

Consider this, a new smaller s/c pulley is only $100 shipped.
 

1hOtStAnG

New Member
Jan 21, 2008
39
0
0
Jan 6, 2009
#22
  • Jan 6, 2009
  • #22
mustangdave said:
I suggest not going past 450 h.p. or so as the internal engine parts are reaching their limits at that point.
Click to expand...

That's not totally accurate.

It's more a question of how much boost psi and not the horsepower.

10 lbs of boost is considered the "safe" limit. So the safety for the engine is the same with a car at 10psi making 440rwhp or another at 10psi making 500rwhp.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Jan 6, 2009
#23
  • Jan 6, 2009
  • #23
1hOtStAnG said:
That's not totally accurate.

It's more a question of how much boost psi and not the horsepower.

10 lbs of boost is considered the "safe" limit. So the safety for the engine is the same with a car at 10psi making 440rwhp or another at 10psi making 500rwhp.
Click to expand...

I stand corrected; you are right, but I think ten p.s.i. is pushing it especially since their are blowers with 5 or 6 p.s.i. making over 450 h.p. on these engines now. Tuning and octane is critical the more boost you throw at it.
 

1hOtStAnG

New Member
Jan 21, 2008
39
0
0
Jan 6, 2009
#24
  • Jan 6, 2009
  • #24
mustangdave said:
I stand corrected; you are right, but I think ten p.s.i. is pushing it especially since their are blowers with 5 or 6 p.s.i. making over 450 h.p. on these engines now.
Click to expand...
I've never seen or heard of anyone who actually makes 450rwhp with only 5-6 psi.

I think the only blower that even makes such a claim, and has yet to prove it, is that new Edlebrock blower. Remember, if you're going to use other peeps cars to validate the power claims you would need to consider all the mods on the car that would increase power. In otherwords, I believe a car running 5-6psi and reaching 450rwhp would also have any number of other mods that are helping to reach that power level.

mustangdave said:
Tuning and octane is critical the more boost you throw at it.
Click to expand...
Agree 100%
 

NastyStang113

New Member
Sep 12, 2008
1,567
1
0
Florida
Jan 6, 2009
#25
  • Jan 6, 2009
  • #25
I beg to differ. 10 psi is "safe" and 12 psi is probably pushing it.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Jan 6, 2009
#26
  • Jan 6, 2009
  • #26
1hOtStAnG said:
I've never seen or heard of anyone who actually makes 450rwhp with only 5-6 psi.

I think the only blower that even makes such a claim, and has yet to prove it, is that new Edlebrock blower. Remember, if you're going to use other peeps cars to validate the power claims you would need to consider all the mods on the car that would increase power. In otherwords, I believe a car running 5-6psi and reaching 450rwhp would also have any number of other mods that are helping to reach that power level.

Agree 100%
Click to expand...

I didn't mean rear wheel h.p., just h.p. at the flywheel. Having driven cars with over 400 at the flywheel, I can honestly say that is all anyone needs on the street. If racing is your thing, then sure, more is always better.
The Edelbrock (due Feb.) claims 460 something at the flywheel with 5 or 6 psi and I think the new Roush is in that ballgame too.
 

rugedraw

New Member
Oct 12, 2004
47
0
0
Miami, FL
Jan 9, 2009
#27
  • Jan 9, 2009
  • #27
Headers & o/r pipes will give you HP gains; my best guess is that is some kind of marketing tactic by KB.

While I have to agree that the factory manifolds on these cars are infinitely better than those on older Stangs, they are still manifolds and not headers; 'nuff said.

The problem with the off-road pipes is that they require a tune. When I put mine on, my car had a check engine light for a good 100 miles. Eventually, the computer "learned" to deal with it, and the light turned off.

However, when I got my custom tune that tuned my car for not having cats, I noticed a BIG difference!

Another thing I noticed when I did my h-pipe, is that the exhaust between 2,500-3,000 RPM made a trumpeting sound when you remove the cats. It made my whole car vibrate. Once I put in the headers, it smoothed out the exhaust note, and made the sound A LOT better!
 
O

o0Dan0o

Founding Member
Feb 8, 2001
485
1
0
Jan 10, 2009
#28
  • Jan 10, 2009
  • #28
That's a huge load. If you were making 700 hp with the factory exhaust my bet is you'd make 800 or more with LT headers and full 3" exhaust.

Off-road pipes I'm not real sure about, but long tube headers are a very real improvement over shorties. Granted, new shorties wouldn't be worth it, but long tubes are. Peak HP and torque gains may only be 10-15, but under the curve gains, especially at lower RPMs, will be very significant.

For the cost, I would leave it for last, but it is a good mod. I'd consider it a must for a heads/cams car.
Dan
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

I
Engine Insane fuel trims +25% LTFT Bank 1, -16% LTFT Bank 2
  • imw_stl
  • Aug 31, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
258
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 19, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
565
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
642
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
T
78 II which 302 exhaust manifolds
  • Texas275
  • Nov 14, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
2K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Nov 18, 2024
Blackhawkxx
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?