I'm wondering which would be better as in longevity and performance. I've heard good things about both. The engine is a 302 w/ DO0E 351 heads w/ and Edelbrock performer RPM cam and intake, this should give you and idea what I'm looking for.
I've got a Centerforce dual friction in my 89 Ranger. It's been there for about 5 years now. Behind two engines, one a mild torquey Explorer level 5.0 and a 331. Good stuff. Shows no signs of giving up. Went thru two HD 94-95 Stang discs before this one
something must of been wrong then, this is the first time i have heard anything bad about centerforce dual friction, how did it fail btw?
in my 85 gt i broke 3 t5 trans, blown apart a set of diff gears and traction loc, broke a drive shaft, and cracked a flywheel from heat abuse. clutch still shows little sign of wear, i will be using it in my 65 next and im confident it will last a few more years of abuse.