• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Which One?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DW5.0L
  • Start date Start date Aug 21, 2005

DW5.0L

Member
May 28, 2005
172
0
16
Florida
Aug 21, 2005
#1
  • Aug 21, 2005
  • #1
Trickflow street EFI or Edelbrock Performer 5.0 intake manifold. Which one would be better for my SD 5.0L? I am going to use an Accufab 70mm throttle body on the intake. Anybody running either one of these?
 

DW5.0L

Member
May 28, 2005
172
0
16
Florida
Aug 22, 2005
#2
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #2
Anybody using either? Whats the difference besides the price? I found a dyno comparison of Performer 5.0, but nothing on the Street EFI.
 

DW5.0L

Member
May 28, 2005
172
0
16
Florida
Aug 22, 2005
#3
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #3
Found an AFM article with dyno results. They tested all intakes on the same engine. Needless to say it was not an SD car. Its a good comparison throughout the RPM's.
 

DW5.0L

Member
May 28, 2005
172
0
16
Florida
Aug 22, 2005
#4
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #4
The Explorer GT-40 makes more HP and TQ 2,200 - 4,000 RPMS. The Performer 5.0 makes more HP and TQ 4,200 - 6,200 RPMS. But the differences were not big between all three. So I have another intake to consider now.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Aug 22, 2005
#5
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #5
Why not buy a cobra / GT-40 intake?

What are your plans for your car? Do you like to drive the street or is it going to be a strip only car. If you do the intake, you will probably want to do the heads (but not the cam on SD.)

You do know it will take a little extra work to get an SD car to run good with mods. (just making sure)
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Aug 22, 2005
#6
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #6
Unless you're gonna convert to mass air, with the kinds of mods you're limited to with SD, the choice between the two you've listed isn't going to make a big difference. I'm with the other poster - if I were sticking with speed density, I'd probably go with a used GT40 variant (Explorer, Cobra, GT40) -- they will perform just as well if not better in the rpm range you're gonna spend most of your time in with the SD system.
 

DW5.0L

Member
May 28, 2005
172
0
16
Florida
Aug 22, 2005
#7
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #7
I am just looking to make my car perform the best under the SD setup. The car won't be a daily driver and will be used on the track once in a while. I don't think I want to go mass air at this point. I am leaning towards the Edelbrock Performer 5.0 as it flows best in the upper RPM band and only is edge out slightly from idle to 4,000 by the Ford intakes. Thanks for the input.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Aug 22, 2005
#8
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #8
What heads are you planning on running (I didn't see any in your sig?)

I only ask because it will be more effiecent to swap the intake and heads at the same time. That will really wake up your car.
 

DW5.0L

Member
May 28, 2005
172
0
16
Florida
Aug 22, 2005
#9
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #9
I am running the stock heads. Had them completety rebuilt and added some roller rockers. Didn't consider upgrading the heads due to SD. The motor is being assembled now so swapping out the intakes won't be a problem.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Aug 22, 2005
#10
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #10
With stock heads, the heads are your bottleneck to greater flow -- it won't matter which intake you use for the most part -- all the ones mentioned in the thread so far will outflow the stock heads by a large margin. So let appearance, cost and availability drive your decision.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Aug 22, 2005
#11
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #11
You could have the stockers ported by Thumper.. That way you don't effect the drivability of the car and you can get rid of some of the bottle necks that the E7TE has to offer. This would allow you to take more advantage of your new intake. BTW: you live in the same state as him.
 

DW5.0L

Member
May 28, 2005
172
0
16
Florida
Aug 22, 2005
#12
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #12
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll look him up to see what he can do.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Aug 22, 2005
#13
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #13
DW5.0L said:
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll look him up to see what he can do.
Click to expand...


Here I helped you out: Thumpers Website => Thumper
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Engine 1988 Foxbody idle issues
  • fernandosgarage55
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
642
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2026
AeroCoupe
351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
545
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
1
Engine 91 mustang 302 Low acceleration car backfires pops and acts like it doesn’t want to take fuel
  • 1991Fox5.0
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2025
1991Fox5.0
1
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
599
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
198
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?