• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Why do people delete their spoilers? Aren't they functional?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ghost001
  • Start date Start date Jan 4, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last
G

Ghost001

New Member
Dec 9, 2002
398
1
0
California
Jan 4, 2004
#1
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #1
Why would someone delete the stock Mustang GT spoiler? Isn't the spoiler functional? At least, at high speeds, or taking a turn at a high speed?

The main reason I could see, is that it makes the car look cleaner, or like less of a NASCAR car. Or maybe they just don't like the look of the stock spoiler, and it's not worth replacing it with a different one? Or, are the stock spoilers not really very functional?
 

Snarf

New Member
Dec 24, 2003
237
1
0
Lexington, KY
Jan 4, 2004
#2
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #2
Im sure they're functional to a degree, but you would have to be doing over 100 to get much downforce from it.. and what little downforce the stock wing makes would be gimpy and lame compared to some of the aftermarket ones.

Just my .02
 
G

Ghost001

New Member
Dec 9, 2002
398
1
0
California
Jan 4, 2004
#3
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #3
Snarf said:
Im sure they're functional to a degree, but you would have to be doing over 100 to get much downforce from it.. and what little downforce the stock wing makes would be gimpy and lame compared to some of the aftermarket ones.

Just my .02
Click to expand...

Well, that makes some sense.

I guess, even if it were more functional, I wouldn't want to put an even bigger spoiler on my car. Also, wouldn't a bigger spoiler have more drag, at lower speeds? It seems like a bigger spoiler would not be very helpful, at a drag strip, because of the relatively low speeds, and because you aren't making any turns. Also, I like being able to see out the rear window.

I've heard that a spoiler only helps if you are doing at least 80 mph, and making a turn.
 
M

MUSTANGLANCE

Founding Member
May 7, 2002
179
0
0
Charleston, SC
Jan 4, 2004
#4
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #4
Here's why I took mine off:

1. All the dip****'s out there with big wings look stupid!
2. Easier to clean and dry.
3. Supposed to get about 1 mph better in the 1/4 due to less drag.
4. Look better IMO like a bullit or FR500.
5. Didn't like the 2000 spoiler to begin with.
6. It's different to have a car without a wing. Even Econo boxes have them. How Gay.
7. Less weight.
8. Don't need downforce unless you a doing 100+ mph and I don't do that hardly ever.
9. See number 1.

lance
 
B

BlkDragon

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
162
0
0
St. Louis
Jan 4, 2004
#5
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #5
If my stock spoiler had resembled the 03 cobra's I would have kept it but, I just like the wingless look. Beyond that, I rarely go faster than 80 mph so I don't think the spoiler was doing much of anything.
 

smttysmth02gt

Have you seen my sig lately?
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 18, 2002
238
1
18
Gulf Coast
Jan 4, 2004
#6
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #6
I think that our stock spoilers look great...I also love the s351 wing. I don't care much for the spoilerless look, but I do think that it looks great on a car w/slicks.
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
Jan 4, 2004
#7
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #7
the vast majority of spoilers that come stock on a cars have an insignificant performance benefit. they are just for looks.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Jan 4, 2004
#8
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #8
I love the 99 spoiler. I think spoilerless is ugly.
I don't think it does anything but create drag though.
 

4.6MustangSteve

New Member
Jun 13, 2003
219
0
0
Northern VA, USA
Jan 4, 2004
#9
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #9
I don't like spoilerless, either. The stock spoilers weren't created with aerodynamics in mind, though. Just looks. So they don't really do anything. I bet that Steeda Race wing does stuff, though. That's what Steeda says and StangDriver5650 says that he feels a bit more stable at high speeds.
 

~Stangzorized~

New Member
Feb 26, 2003
466
0
0
no mustang no care
Jan 4, 2004
#10
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #10
WINGLESS is CLEEEEEEEAN!
 

70stangcoupe

Founding Member
Nov 12, 2001
2,895
0
0
Winston-Salem, NC
Jan 4, 2004
#11
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #11
I like the wingless look on 99+s.

Wingless on 94-98 looks teh gay.
 

Trublu01

SPRAYMAN
Founding Member
Mar 11, 2001
6,673
0
0
Loxahatchee, FL
Jan 4, 2004
#12
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #12
I do gain 1-2 mph in the 1/4 with it off. The look grew on me.
 

stangtrooper97

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2002
322
1
0
King of Prussia
Jan 4, 2004
#13
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #13
I had mine off for a while but wasn't happy with the four holes i had in my trunklid. I put it back on till I can get the holes properly filled.
 

skywarp

New Member
Nov 28, 2003
379
0
0
Jan 4, 2004
#14
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #14
Gonna take mine off on mine because with it, looks like a 6cyl. Why did Ford put the same spoilers on GTs and 6cyls.
 

01GT eibach

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,075
0
36
Pittsburgh, PA
Jan 4, 2004
#15
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #15
I doubt that the current stock wing will provide any downforce functionality at any speed. To me it looks okay, but I went with a Saleen wing for a more unique look. I am not a big fan of wingless, but that is just me...
 
R

Ryan L

Founding Member
Apr 15, 2001
783
0
16
St. Augustine, FL
Jan 4, 2004
#16
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #16
Cleaner is better.

I picked up a painted S281 wing cheap on eBay so I've been using that instead. I like wingless better, but I get way more compliments now.
 

COBRA90GT

Mustang Master
Sep 22, 2001
6,654
0
87
HOCKEYTOWN ® , MI
Jan 4, 2004
#17
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #17
DBMSTNG said:
the vast majority of spoilers that come stock on a cars have an insignificant performance benefit. they are just for looks.
Click to expand...


Exactly, most factory spoilers are just for looks...

I was fortunate enough to have found my 'stang on the lot sans wing & fell in love with the wingless look...
 

decoy562

New Member
Oct 9, 2003
1,526
0
0
Acworth, GA
Jan 4, 2004
#18
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #18
It's just for looks, no function.
 

DeadLurker

Daily Driven
Sep 7, 2001
7,702
0
0
New York
Jan 4, 2004
#19
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #19
I like the look of the 01-04 spoilers and that's why I keep it.
 
G

Ghost001

New Member
Dec 9, 2002
398
1
0
California
Jan 4, 2004
#20
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #20
Does anyone have any URLs that provide proof, about whether the 99-04 Mustang wing is functional?

I've been surfing the Net (google), trying to find any URL that presents experimental results, or computer simulations, or some sort of authoritative discussion about it, but I haven't found anything that offers real proof. Is it something that can only be measured by the "seat of the pants", on fast turns? I doubt it. Surely downforce on a fast turn must be measurable with instruments of some sort, in a wind tunnel. Just have the Mustang at an angle, relative to the wind direction, with a scale underneath each tire.

I guess, if I can't find any authoritative URLs, I'll probably just leave my stock wing on, because that's easier than taking it off, and I like the way it looks. And who knows, maybe it does provide a tiny bit of downforce on fast turns... However, if I find proof that it's not at all functional, then I may remove it.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Electrical Why does my fox body keep frying eecs
  • brandyn200
  • Jun 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
241
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
721
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Engine Throwing codes 94, 33, 34, 44, and sporadic engine shutoff.
  • Ryu
  • Oct 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
973
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2024
89ripper
1
Electrical 1985 mustang gt Led conversion trouble
  • 1985fox
  • Jan 5, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
627
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 15, 2026
1985fox
1
S
Car shakes when taking off help???
  • STANKYstangs
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
310
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?