• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Why don't the ports line up better from heads to intake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pwcracer
  • Start date Start date Jun 20, 2005

pwcracer

Founding Member
Jun 13, 2000
347
0
16
Hastings, MN, USA
Jun 20, 2005
#1
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #1
I set the intake gasket on the heads on my car and they line up well (Meaning the gasket intake opening is the same size of the gasket. when I placed the gasket on my stock intake, there is at least 1/4 inch gap all around, where the intake port on the manifold is much smaller than the intake port on the head. What is the point of this? I have been elliminating bottlenecks in my system, and now I think I ran into another one, I am installing GT40 heads, but I have to use my stock lower intake due to my Kenne Bell charger, only working with the stock intake.
My car is going to suck I bet
 
E

emagdnim

Active Member
Feb 5, 2003
391
15
28
Jun 20, 2005
#2
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #2
You have to port the intake to match the heads for best performance . Spend a night grinding and it will be worth it
 

pwcracer

Founding Member
Jun 13, 2000
347
0
16
Hastings, MN, USA
Jun 20, 2005
#3
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #3
I was thinking about that, but do you think there would be much to gain, when the runners in the intake manifold appear to be the same size as the tiny ports?
 
E

emagdnim

Active Member
Feb 5, 2003
391
15
28
Jun 20, 2005
#4
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #4
The lower intake on a 5.0 is a big bottleneck you need to port this if you want to make decent power unless you go aftermarket upper/lower intake... a good ported lower with the stock upper can be good for 300hp with tons of torque.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jun 21, 2005
#5
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #5
The lower should absolutely be ported for best power under a KB 1500. I've done a bunch and dyno tested a 80lb-ft increase peak and gains all the way from idle through the whole curve on one customers car who did before and after dynos with no other changes.
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
46
Mill Creek, WA
stangnet.cardomain.com
Jun 21, 2005
#6
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #6
Is there a way to swap to the GT40 KB or does it require a whole new blower?
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jun 21, 2005
#7
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #7
KB 1500 - stock lower only

KB 2200 - GT40 style lower only
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
46
Mill Creek, WA
stangnet.cardomain.com
Jun 21, 2005
#8
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #8
tmoss said:
KB 1500 - stock lower only

KB 2200 - GT40 style lower only
Click to expand...

Ouch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
680
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 30, 2026
keel
Engine Head gasket port matching plus head/intake port alignment
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 10, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
507
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 12, 2024
PonyGTrider
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
319
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
956
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Forced Induction Bypass valve backwards?
  • Dontknowchit
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
349
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 29, 2025
JD1964
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?