• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Will a 9 inch rear from a 68 Ranchero bolt up to my 67?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BaLleRz68
  • Start date Start date Jul 9, 2004
B

BaLleRz68

Founding Member
Oct 9, 2001
150
0
17
Jul 9, 2004
#1
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #1
There's a guy locally who is selling a 9 inch rear out of a 1968 Ranchero GT 390. I was wondering if it will bolt up to my 67 without any problems? Are the spring perches in the same locaiton? He is asking $250. Is this a good price? Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks.
 
B

Bonestock2k

Member
Jun 18, 2004
51
0
6
Jul 9, 2004
#2
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #2
From what I read from all the 9" info provided in this forum, the rear end should be the same flange to flange but spring perches could be different. I would measure to be certain. My 2 cents on the 250 dollar price is it all boils down to condition of the unit and how much it would cost to have the spring perches relocated.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 10, 2004
#3
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #3
The spring perches should be 43" center to center to fit your Stang. $250 is a good price for a 9" that fits a Stang, otherwise it would be too much $$$ unless it had a posi unit in it.
 
M

mak6363

New Member
Jun 17, 2004
21
0
0
Jul 10, 2004
#4
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #4
There is a rearend dimension chart in the July issue of Mustang and Fords magazine. It shows the flange to flange dimension the same at 59.375". the spring pads are 43" centerline to centerline for the mustang as previously mentioned. For the Ranchero spring pads are 41.25" centerline to centerline.
$250 sounds like a good price to me.
 
B

BaLleRz68

Founding Member
Oct 9, 2001
150
0
17
Jul 10, 2004
#5
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #5
Thanks for the reply. Whats a good price to get new spring perches welded on?
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jul 10, 2004
#6
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #6
Beat me to it...
All the Rancheros had narrow spring pads.
Get the price down, then have the pads relocated... assuming the flange to flange is do-able for your year Stang.
The 'caruck' might be a good source for a factory posi and low gear. My 71 had a wierd gear... 3.28.
Dave
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
535
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 6, 2026
85GT4V
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
100
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
602
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
982
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
229
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?