• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

will it work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 7D3mach
  • Start date Start date Aug 24, 2005

7D3mach

Member
May 9, 2005
48
0
6
Melfort, SK
Aug 24, 2005
#1
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #1
Okay, so I have the chance to buy a 4V Ford factory aluminum intake for next to nothing. I have no idea what year of engine it is from but I am assuming it is from a later 302. I think it would be a step up from a 2V cast intake. I was just wondering if this intake will work on a later style 302? The engine that I want to put it on is a 1974 302. I know that there were some differences between the early and later 302s but is there a way to make it work? gaskets?

Thanks
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Aug 24, 2005
#2
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #2
its hard to say if it will work since we/you don't know what it is. If its just a regular production 302 4 barrel intake, it isn't worth the trouble to swap it anyway. There were some 'over the counter" intakes made and sold by ford in the late sixties that were actually pretty good and would be a worthy upgrade.
 

7D3mach

Member
May 9, 2005
48
0
6
Melfort, SK
Aug 24, 2005
#3
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #3
Well I just found out that it is from an '83 GT 5.0. Do you think that it would help any over my stock cast 2V?
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Aug 25, 2005
#4
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #4
its not worth the effort in my opinion. Just save up some more money and put a nice aftermarket piece on it.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Aug 26, 2005
#5
  • Aug 26, 2005
  • #5
actually yes it is worth the effort to install that intake for two reasons;

1: the stock 2bbl intake is cast iron, and the one you can get is aluminum and thus lighter.

2: the 4bbl intake you are looking at is a minor step down from an edelbrock performer intake, and with a 4100 autolite carb will give you better performance than the 2bbl carb, as well as better fuel efficiency. i say go for it.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Aug 26, 2005
#6
  • Aug 26, 2005
  • #6
it'll still run out of breath at 4500 rpm or so. A 1983 mustang intake is not a performance piece by any stretch of the imagination.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Aug 26, 2005
#7
  • Aug 26, 2005
  • #7
Step up....yes, worth paying for...no.

I have to agree with 302 on this one. I don't know what you paying for it but like 302 said save up and get a performer rpm or even an airgap.

Unless its free I don't see the point really. Now if you can talk who ever into giving it to you then
 

7D3mach

Member
May 9, 2005
48
0
6
Melfort, SK
Aug 26, 2005
#8
  • Aug 26, 2005
  • #8
it's almost free...$5CDN, so to you Americans it is almost like nothing. LOL. Being that I am still in high school and only work part time it is very hard for me to have a lot of money. I'd love a better intake but paying for parts for a complete resto is bad enough. I think that it will be better than what I have now but will get switched in the future.

Thanks guys
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Aug 26, 2005
#9
  • Aug 26, 2005
  • #9
Yeah, then I would say do it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
155
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
639
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
705
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 21, 2026
86_Capri
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
238
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
P
Engine Mysterious coolant leak at back of engine
  • palerider94
  • Jan 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
159
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 19, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?