• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

will running 18x9's in front and 20x10's in the rear affect my car?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tfn4sho
  • Start date Start date Sep 26, 2006

tfn4sho

New Member
Apr 19, 2005
18
0
1
Jersey City , NJ
Sep 26, 2006
#1
  • Sep 26, 2006
  • #1
i was wondering if running 18x9's in the front and 20x10's in the rear affect the way my 2004 gt rides? will it cause any harm to the car or it's performance?
 
O

OneStiffGT

New Member
Jan 18, 2006
87
0
0
Canada
Sep 26, 2006
#2
  • Sep 26, 2006
  • #2
What tires are you planning to run?

I am assumiung you wont be able to launch good with 20's since the sidewall will be alot smaller and wont leave room for it to flex.
 
T

Triisomy21

New Member
Mar 1, 2006
2
0
0
Sep 26, 2006
#3
  • Sep 26, 2006
  • #3
Not only will you have a harsher ride, those heavy a** wheels will slow you down.

Performance and 20's don't mix.
 
R

RoadconeTuning

New Member
Apr 4, 2006
458
0
0
Upstate, SC
Sep 26, 2006
#4
  • Sep 26, 2006
  • #4
those 20's are probably going to be 32lbs + each and you will have a ROUGH ride... like really bad... plus if you hit a rock youll bend a rim... it MIGHT look good but its going to ride and perform like ass.. and w/ wheels that big youll pretty much HAVE to upgrade yourbrakes in order to help slow all that metal down...
 

tfn4sho

New Member
Apr 19, 2005
18
0
1
Jersey City , NJ
Sep 26, 2006
#5
  • Sep 26, 2006
  • #5
thanks, i'm better off going with some 18x10.5 in the rears then. just wanted to double check with some outside advice. thanks guys.
 

Dope 97GT

New Member
Jul 16, 2005
439
0
0
Rochester, NY (SUNY Brockport)
Sep 26, 2006
#6
  • Sep 26, 2006
  • #6
tfn4sho said:
thanks, i'm better off going with some 18x10.5 in the rears then. just wanted to double check with some outside advice. thanks guys.
Click to expand...

yeah i think so. plus i dont think the different wheel sizes on our cars look that great not like the older muscle cars of the 60's and 70's...them things look great with the big wheels out back.
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Sep 26, 2006
#7
  • Sep 26, 2006
  • #7
Yeah, when you put huge wheels on, it sort of changes the gearing. Not in the literal sense, but say you go from the stock 17's down to 15's. The car is going to drive like you have different gears because the amount that needs to be rotated is less. Same when you increase wheels.. it'll be like driving one of those old honda civics where you could go like 90mph in first before having to shift.

*begin rant*

Anyway.. yeah, the big wheels on back small on front are sort of old school. Just don't be one of the people who gets it all wrong and raises the rear end. Talk about missing the point. It's LOWER the front end to simulate a huge motor, not RAISE the back end!
Damn neo-musclecarists!

*end rant*
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Sep 26, 2006
#8
  • Sep 26, 2006
  • #8
Get ready for some sick understeer.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 26, 2006
#9
  • Sep 26, 2006
  • #9
Save the staggard wheels sizes for the big money guys driving the Vettes and Ford GT's. Mustang look and perform their best when the wheels are the same diameter all the way around the car.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Sep 26, 2006
#10
  • Sep 26, 2006
  • #10
sidewall will still be 35 mm most likely which is about what ull have on ur 18's so bending the rim and traction is about the same odds, but ull need a new rear brake set up so you can actually stop 60lbs of rotating mass per side. Not really worth it IMHO plus ur "gearing" will go way down.
 
9

99BRINGIT

Founding Member
Dec 27, 2000
1,153
1
0
Oklahoma City, OK
Dec 21, 2006
#11
  • Dec 21, 2006
  • #11
I run the set up that is in question. I havent had ANY of the problems that have previously been stated. And the weight of the rear wheels is actually lighter than the 18x10.5 FR500s that were previously on the car. So........yea.




I will be going with 20s and 22s on my 05' car.




 
B

bullitt23

New Member
Dec 20, 2006
4
0
0
Dec 21, 2006
#12
  • Dec 21, 2006
  • #12
what do you guys think about a deep dish rim in the back with a normal lip in the front?
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Dec 21, 2006
#13
  • Dec 21, 2006
  • #13
deep dish is pure sex. i want to have my current wheels (17x9 Konig Villians) as track wheels and get some SSR GT3s in 18x9 front and 18x10.5 rear for DD wheels.
 

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Dec 21, 2006
#14
  • Dec 21, 2006
  • #14
99BRINGIT said:
I run the set up that is in question. I havent had ANY of the problems that have previously been stated. And the weight of the rear wheels is actually lighter than the 18x10.5 FR500s that were previously on the car. So........yea.
Click to expand...


You haven't experienced that your car is slower? Aside from weight, rotational mass will slow the car. When I put 18's I could feel a difference between 17" and 18" wheels.

I don't really care for the look of the 20's on back and 18's on front. They look circus like.
 
9

99BRINGIT

Founding Member
Dec 27, 2000
1,153
1
0
Oklahoma City, OK
Dec 22, 2006
#15
  • Dec 22, 2006
  • #15
merc123 said:
You haven't experienced that your car is slower? Aside from weight, rotational mass will slow the car.
Click to expand...

I havent ever noticed any kind of a difference. Although, I have only driven it a handful of times in the last couple of years. But its still a 500hp car, so the rotating mass hasnt been too much of an issue. If anything traction issues have almost improved, from what they were with the 18's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Best tire size for 91 Fox 18x9 wheels. On coilovers
  • hassler
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
437
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
KRUISR
O
Good all around perfornace-ish tires?
  • optionizerSS
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
366
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 15, 2026
TPony
J
Engine 4.6 Running rough at half throttle
  • jake411
  • Aug 3, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
112
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 4, 2026
jake411
J
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
535
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 6, 2026
85GT4V
Cobra Brake Conversion - Spare Wheel/Tire Search
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
108
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sunday at 10:48 PM
Shakerhood
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?