• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

worked stock heads vs aftermarket heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter Redsnake2
  • Start date Start date Aug 9, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Redsnake2

New Member
Aug 8, 2005
374
0
0
Philly, PA
Aug 9, 2005
#1
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #1
I have a 94GT and I wanna do the heads cause I'm building a Twin turbo engine, I have a guy that works with me who Pro races with the like of John Force and Dan Millen who says he can make my stock heads flow like AFR's or better..

Should I give him a chance or have you guys heard of stock heads being worked to perform like that? This guy is good.. and the best part is he will do it for only $200

What do you guys think?
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Aug 9, 2005
#2
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #2
Well if he's working with people like that I'm sure he knows more then us. However I would have to see a flow chart proving he can achieve that type of flow from these crappy heads. If he can for that price that's great but this reminds me of the phrase "You get what you oay for".
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Aug 9, 2005
#3
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #3
People seem to be fairly successful with ported E7TE heads like Thumper heads which are $400 I think. They probably won't flow crazy but you should be able to get them up to par with a GT40 head or better. If you feel confident in the guy, for $200, go for it I say.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Aug 9, 2005
#4
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #4
No disrespect to Dan Millen, but he is no where near John Force's league.

And, since you friend pro races with both of them, it kinda makes me wonder....

And, since he can get E7's to flow more than AFR's, my question to you becomes this:

I have lots of beachfront property on one of Malibu, California's largest nude beaches. I'm selling it for EXTREMELY cheap. I'll sell it to you for what you would pay to have those heads done ($200). Interested?

Joe
 

mytight95

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,605
0
46
Dothan,Al
Aug 9, 2005
#5
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #5






ported stock heads do okay....but they will leave you with the yearning for more afterward, and if you cant sell them, then you are out that money... NOt bashing as i run ported e7's with larger valves etc. and plan on upgrading to an AFR or Edelbrock head this winter....



jason
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 9, 2005
#6
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #6
Keep this in mind about porting anything that is oem.

It is an improvment that only goes so far!

Companies like Edelbrock, AFR, TFS, etc have learned a thing or two since 1994 and they put that knowledge to use in their products.

For the most part, you can't modify 1994 oem technology to match the technology of today.

Later
Grady
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Aug 9, 2005
#7
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #7
Also, I don't know about you guys, but I want to reduce the weight of my "tank" as much as possible.......
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Aug 9, 2005
#8
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #8
final5-0 said:
For the most part, you can't modify 1994 oem technology to match the technology of today.
Click to expand...
And you're being generous calling E7TE heads 1994 technology . Probably not a lot different than what was available in the late 60's.

Dave
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Aug 9, 2005
#9
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #9
But for someone like me, its at least something. Not everyone has the money for aluminum heads and a $500+ intake manifold (+ supporting mods and parts). Basicly, if you have the money for aluminum heads, it would be stupid to not buy them over ported E7's.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 9, 2005
#10
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #10
Rootus said:
And you're being generous calling E7TE heads 1994 technology . Probably not a lot different than what was available in the late 60's.

Dave
Click to expand...

Need to go on back to the early 60's.

I did think about saying something like that but

I thought, who would care about that old stuff anyway

Later
Grady
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Aug 9, 2005
#11
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #11
if thats what you gotta do get it. It'll be an improvement. I'm going with gt-40p heads because they're cheap, an upgrade and i dont have a grand to put in some AFR's.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Aug 9, 2005
#12
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #12
SeventyMach1 said:
Also, I don't know about you guys, but I want to reduce the weight of my "tank" as much as possible.......
Click to expand...

I saved over 40 lbs with JUST the heads. Stock iron heads weighed in at 51 lbs without the rockers and all. My TFS heads weighed in at 30 lbs with the studs and guideplates in place.
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Aug 9, 2005
#13
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #13
the stock heads are VERY heavy...my P heads feel like picking up a damn elephant
 

Labora

Founding Member
Jun 11, 2000
1,854
26
69
Dallas, Texas
Aug 10, 2005
#14
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • #14
IF you are going to port stock heads atleast try and track down a set of gt40's first! Just my 2 cents. Of course if you add up gt40's + cost of porting you might find you are pretty close to the price of aftermarket heads. So I guess it depends on what your goals are in the long run.
 

V8SHME8

Member
Apr 24, 2004
120
0
16
Gainesville, Fl
Aug 10, 2005
#15
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • #15
I am not sure people have a solid concept of how bad the stock heads actually are if you wanted to make power to the red line. With an E cam and 1.6 rockers, the stock heads can flow about half the air required for a stock displacement 302 to operate at around 85% at 6250. This is not taking into account valve shrouding, flat bottom or under cut valves, or piston dome. The point is that starting with the stock head is a serious mistake. Save another 100 bucks and buy some p heads they flow better than gt40s at every lift.
 

V8SHME8

Member
Apr 24, 2004
120
0
16
Gainesville, Fl
Aug 10, 2005
#16
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • #16
1
 

Redsnake2

New Member
Aug 8, 2005
374
0
0
Philly, PA
Aug 10, 2005
#17
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • #17
thanks guys for the input and Joes95GT I will be calling about that land real soon...LOL

Guess i better just take my time and save up for the Edelbrocks or AFR's then.. Didn't want to spend a 1000 bucks on heads
 

greenlantern

Member
Jul 11, 2004
265
1
17
St Louis Mo
Aug 10, 2005
#18
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • #18
The first set of heads I changed out was a set of ported E7te's. Although they were an improvement, money would have been better spent waiting on a set of better heads. Besides the biggest problem with E7 heads are the tiny valves. In order to make any decent amount of power they would have to be swapped out with bigger valves. That alone will put a big hole in $200
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Aug 10, 2005
#19
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • #19
What greenlantern said is exactly why I am now selling my GT40's and gonna buy some AFR's or TF's. Plus the weight issue. If you can get past those (again, it depends on goals) then you could go with some ported cast irons. (preferably GT40's or GT40P's)


Good luck with whatever you decide.......
 
H

HUNTED

New Member
Aug 2, 2005
42
0
0
ENID, OKLAHOMA
Aug 11, 2005
#20
  • Aug 11, 2005
  • #20
keep in mind that cast iron heads make more hp that aluminum heads but the advantage is that aluminum heads keep the car cooler and they are lighter weight which means more mph on your car. Went throught this with d&d motorsports the finally talked me into tf twisted wedge heads. You are gunna have as much money tied up in the stock heads as you would in just buying a set of aluminum and you run a risk of the guy ****ing up your heads
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
839
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
942
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
913
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
83
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?