• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Worth It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sherwin
  • Start date Start date Jul 7, 2012
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

Sherwin

New Member
May 20, 2012
18
0
1
Saskatchewan, Canada
Jul 7, 2012
#1
  • Jul 7, 2012
  • #1
I'm enjoying my first Mustang 100%, don't know why I waited this long to get it. Its a 1996 GT Convertible with 160k kms on it (about 100k miles). Manual trans. Has a nice sounding magnaflow exhaust with O/R "H" pipe, CAI, and SCT tuner to boot. The car has some rattles and collected "character", but isn't too bad for a 16 year old car I suppose.

I'm considering doing a few things that I've read are a good idea from this site. Subframe Connectors seem to be a must, I'd like to change the rear end to 3.73 or 4.10, and I'm tossing the idea of a Kenne Bell S/C. I'm hesitant with the KB because of the miles on the car. For a daily driver would it be fine or is it possible the motor is spent past safely running a blower?

Thanks in advance for your input...
 

slayerripkdc

15 Year Member
Jun 3, 2003
1,341
16
59
brewster ny
Jul 8, 2012
#2
  • Jul 8, 2012
  • #2
Do a compression test. Should be fine with a safe tune.
 

joshjwc9

Active Member
Jun 12, 2006
1,095
17
39
Palm Harbor, FL
Jul 8, 2012
#3
  • Jul 8, 2012
  • #3
If your dead set on a Twin Screw blower stay with 3.55's or 3.73's. 4.10's will be too much for stock 245 sized tires. If the car is properly maintained and tuned, you can supercharge or turbo anything. I put a Vortech on my car at 132k miles. I'm at 154k now..non intercooled and in FL. I run 3.73's with the Vortech too, plus it is my only vehicle. I've had my timing replaced, water pump and idler pulleys all fixed to make sure nothing bad happens. Just always run 93 octane and be sure to get a wideband just in case too.
 
S

Sherwin

New Member
May 20, 2012
18
0
1
Saskatchewan, Canada
Jul 8, 2012
#4
  • Jul 8, 2012
  • #4
Thanks for the replies. I wouldn't say I'm dead set on a Twin Screw type blower, but they have the most gains per $ spent from my research. I have a great deal on a full set of PI parts for the PI head swap as well.

What should PSI be on a car like this if I check the compression?
 

usaf_branham

15 Year Member
Oct 30, 2008
927
134
84
Boston
Jul 8, 2012
#5
  • Jul 8, 2012
  • #5
if you dont plan on using it as a quarter mile car, 4.10's and a KB is fun as hell on the street. if you run the quarter, you will hit the rev limiter in 4th.
 
S

Sherwin

New Member
May 20, 2012
18
0
1
Saskatchewan, Canada
Jul 8, 2012
#6
  • Jul 8, 2012
  • #6
I don't get into the formal racing thing. Its more of a goof off car with my kids, cruise the local Broadway and to the lake sort of thing. Occasional highway run...leaning more towards 3.73 to keep revs down on the highway, but it would still be a huge improvement over the 2.73 in it now for fooling around...
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Jul 8, 2012
#7
  • Jul 8, 2012
  • #7
if you cant do the gears and SFCs at the same time, id personally do the gears before the SFC's...gears have much more of a fun factor IMHO
 
S

Sherwin

New Member
May 20, 2012
18
0
1
Saskatchewan, Canada
Jul 8, 2012
#8
  • Jul 8, 2012
  • #8
I agree with the gears, and being as they're relatively cheap and "quick" to do, I'll be doing gears and the subframe connectors pretty quick. Does anyone have anything to say about the bolt on connectors vs the weld in style? I can easily install the bolt in ones myself, but they cost more. Weld ones are cheap but by the time I have a shop install them would be a wash likely...

Opinions? Educated thoughts?
 

SteedaGT9150

Advanced Member
Nov 10, 2004
1,351
59
68
Maryland
Jul 8, 2012
#9
  • Jul 8, 2012
  • #9
Sherwin said:
I agree with the gears, and being as they're relatively cheap and "quick" to do, I'll be doing gears and the subframe connectors pretty quick. Does anyone have anything to say about the bolt on connectors vs the weld in style? I can easily install the bolt in ones myself, but they cost more. Weld ones are cheap but by the time I have a shop install them would be a wash likely...

Opinions? Educated thoughts?
Click to expand...

If your going with subframes go with the weld in. It will be much more structurally sound...
 
S

Sherwin

New Member
May 20, 2012
18
0
1
Saskatchewan, Canada
Jul 8, 2012
#10
  • Jul 8, 2012
  • #10
I read somewhere that you should pull the floor carpet up to avoid burning it when welding. Is this BS, or a legitimate concern?
 

AZmustang98

Member
Oct 19, 2011
373
17
19
Flagstaff, Arizona
Jul 8, 2012
#11
  • Jul 8, 2012
  • #11
Does Kenne Bell even make the manifold for NPI heads anymore?
 
S

Sherwin

New Member
May 20, 2012
18
0
1
Saskatchewan, Canada
Jul 9, 2012
#12
  • Jul 9, 2012
  • #12
according to their website yes, a non-intercooled 6-14psi kit...
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Jul 9, 2012
#13
  • Jul 9, 2012
  • #13
Sherwin said:
I read somewhere that you should pull the floor carpet up to avoid burning it when welding. Is this BS, or a legitimate concern?
Click to expand...

BS
 

03_TrueBlue_GT

Active Member
May 5, 2010
810
41
29
Houston, Tx
Jul 10, 2012
#14
  • Jul 10, 2012
  • #14
Nightfire said:
BS
Click to expand...
Thanks this is good to know! I was wanting to order some, and I saw his comment about the carpet and I was like but then you saved the day.
 

Sharad

ALWAYS choose the V over the P!!! Wait... what?
Jan 5, 2011
1,562
480
94
Fort Myers, Florida
Jul 10, 2012
#15
  • Jul 10, 2012
  • #15
Sherwin said:
I'm enjoying my first Mustang 100%, don't know why I waited this long to get it. Its a 1996 GT Convertible with 160k kms on it (about 100k miles). Manual trans. Has a nice sounding magnaflow exhaust with O/R "H" pipe, CAI, and SCT tuner to boot. The car has some rattles and collected "character", but isn't too bad for a 16 year old car I suppose.

I'm considering doing a few things that I've read are a good idea from this site. Subframe Connectors seem to be a must, I'd like to change the rear end to 3.73 or 4.10, and I'm tossing the idea of a Kenne Bell S/C. I'm hesitant with the KB because of the miles on the car. For a daily driver would it be fine or is it possible the motor is spent past safely running a blower?

Thanks in advance for your input...
Click to expand...

Definitely full length weld in SFCs, and upgrade your suspension & tires if you're planning to KB supercharge it. The KBs make a ton of torque, so you'll have a lot of fun tooling around town with it. I'm a ProCharger man myself, but my dad has a KB on one of his Mustangs and an Eaton on the other. They're both a lot of fun to powerslide around in.
 
S

Sherwin

New Member
May 20, 2012
18
0
1
Saskatchewan, Canada
Jul 11, 2012
#16
  • Jul 11, 2012
  • #16
Is there pro's/con's to either one? The pricing seems similar, yet the gains seem much more impressive with the twin screw style vs the centrifuge style...Ease of install on either? Has anyone worked wit both?

Right now the car sits on Sumitomo's, and I've recently put an Eibach Lowering spring kit in it...
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Jul 11, 2012
#17
  • Jul 11, 2012
  • #17
KB > centri IMO. I prefer the flat torque curve though.

Guy I know locally had a KB on his '04 GT and it put down around 430 RWHP (car has a forged MMR 4.6). He sold the KB last year and installed a on3 turbo kit. Car now makes 560+ RWHP.

It's funny, the KB felt faster because it slams you in the seat right off idle, but the turbo has this OMG rush of acceleration once it spools up (similar to the vortech just more aggressive).

You decide what you prefer. Flat torque that's available at any RPM (more fun on the street IMO), or a rush of top end power that pulls harder and harder all the way to redline.
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Jul 12, 2012
#18
  • Jul 12, 2012
  • #18
Sherwin said:
The KB is a "twin screw" style of supercharger, also refered to as a "positive displacement supercharger... Centrifuge superchargers would be that of Vortech, Paxton, and others that resemble a turbo assembly but they're belt driven instead of spooled by exhaust pressure...
Click to expand...

Uhhh, no kidding.....

We're not a bunch of car noobz (well most of us).
 
4

40oz

Member
Jan 9, 2006
499
3
18
Minneapolis
Jul 12, 2012
#19
  • Jul 12, 2012
  • #19
^ what these guys said, re positive displacement vs. centrifugal.

A lot of low end torque is fun screwing around in town, but when you shift at 6000 rpms and land at 4000 in the next gear, torque at 2500 rpms is not useful. I prefer high rpm power, but plenty of people see more fun burning the tires from stoplights than winding out a motor. I'd choose a turbo or centrifugal every time, but that's not the right choice for everyone.

You'd enjoy both, so I wouldn't make a decision based purely on cost.
 

Sharad

ALWAYS choose the V over the P!!! Wait... what?
Jan 5, 2011
1,562
480
94
Fort Myers, Florida
Jul 12, 2012
#20
  • Jul 12, 2012
  • #20
There's no right or wrong answer, but I choose ATI ProCharger.
 
Reactions: fiveohwblow
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

5
What's it Worth? 1990 Notchback 5.0
  • 50notch90
  • Apr 14, 2024
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
4
Views
2K
What is it Worth?!?!? Apr 23, 2024
50notch90
5
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
New to me Fox body. Looking for Rough HP and compression ratio
  • Halford4491
  • Oct 30, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 3, 2021
General karthief
For Sale 97 Cobra with built 99 cobra drivetrain
  • AvalancheSVT
  • May 14, 2022
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
3
Views
3K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) May 22, 2022
AvalancheSVT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?