• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Would a bigger MAF be worthwhile on a stocker??

  • Thread starter Thread starter stangsman
  • Start date Start date Mar 6, 2004
S

stangsman

Member
Nov 24, 2003
45
1
8
Mar 6, 2004
#1
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #1
I have a '95 gt and was thinking of adding a C&L 73mm with C&L truflow alum pipe and k&n filter for the stock 19lb injectors. Just want to know if this is a worthwhile upgrade. Would I feel any difference as I intend to keep the stock tb. Or would the set up be any more effective with the bigger 65mm tb. I was thinking that with a stock motor, a too big MAF would create too large mass of air that would bottleneck at the point of the stock tb. For this reason, I consider the C&L 73 rather than a Pro-M 77. Let me know if my thinking is wrong and to stick with the better Pro-M piece. Or, just ditch the whole idea and just install a k&n filter. I've already uncorked the exhaust with long tubes, matching h-pipe with converters and a catback. I don't want to lose any low end torque. Any input would be greatly appreciated. Besides the headers, the rest of the motor is completely stock.
Stangsman: pro 5.0 shifter, 3.73's, l/t headers, h-pipe w/converters, mac catback, 14deg timing
 

silverGTSaleen

New Member
Apr 6, 2003
243
0
0
Texas!
Mar 7, 2004
#2
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #2
Dang good question, Id like to know also
 

95BLBLVert

Founding Member
Nov 2, 1999
486
0
0
Lake Wylie, SC
Mar 7, 2004
#3
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #3
A larger throttle body, like a 65 mm, on a totally stock motor will not benefit without better exhaust flow. Plus the stock heads limit airflow as well. Since you do have exhaust mods, a 65 mm may benefit you. A larger maf will definitely benefit you. Actually the air will not bottle neck as you say. Air speed increases from a larger diameter pipe to a smaller one. The maf should always be larger than the throttle body (naturally aspirated). I use the 76mm Trueflow and a 65mm tb with great results.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Mar 7, 2004
#4
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #4
I don't think a larger MAF will do much of anything untill you get into the major mods like H/C/I or blown stuff. Untill you hit probably in the high 200, low 300hp range I don't see the point of getting one larger than 65mm, an aftermarket 65 could be benificial since our stock 65 has a the really big sampling tube which may be restrictive, which I think is why people say go one size larger than the TB. But I wouldn't bother buying an aftermarket one untill you actually know that that is your bottleneck.
 

S/CBlack95GT

New Member
Apr 6, 2003
2,018
0
0
Tampa Palms, FL
Mar 7, 2004
#5
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #5
I would not get a MAF until you do more, such as heads and an intake. If you order a MAF for 19# you will eventually want to recal it for 24# or bigger. You could get 24# injectors and a 24# MAF. That would cost more but it would prepare you for the future, unless you don't plan on modifying. At any rate I would get a Pro-M. The 80mm is around $300.
 

HoofnIt

Founding Member
Jan 8, 2001
1,175
0
36
North Carolina
Mar 7, 2004
#6
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #6
Air speed increases from a larger diameter pipe to a smaller one.

This statement is not true. Actually, it is the opposite. As the diameter is decreased, the velocity is increased. Think of putting your thumb over the end of the hose with water running out. The more your thumb covers the hose opening, the faster the water shoots out. The speed of the incoming air is not as important as the volume of air that it can allow in; measured in CFM or cubic feet per minute

Stock meter 70mm - flows about 815 CFM
80mm Pro M - flows 1612 CFM
 

swingline

New Member
Sep 18, 2003
1,252
0
0
TCB - Taking Care of Business
Mar 7, 2004
#7
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #7
A new one won't hurt but you might want to hold off until you know what you are doing with your car. If you do H/C/I then you are going to want bigger injectors; so buying a new MAF for you 19lbs will be throwing your money away.
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Mar 7, 2004
#8
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #8
Yea i wouldnt bother with a MAF right now. I ran my times in sig with a stock MAF. I also had a pro-m 75mm at the time, and i swapped back and forth a few times, never noticed any difference. The car ran better with the stocker, thats why i kept it on.

I would make your own CAI out of pvc, cheap, easy, and it works. Otherwise, start saving for an intake manifold.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Mar 7, 2004
#9
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #9
I agree with those who advised to wait until later.

Look at my sig for an example. Maybe it will help.

Later
Grady
 

silverGTSaleen

New Member
Apr 6, 2003
243
0
0
Texas!
Mar 7, 2004
#10
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #10
So if somone has the Stock MAF but buys an after throttle body they will have gains, correct? If so about how much?
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Mar 7, 2004
#11
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #11
Not worth it with stock heads, cam.

Jake
 

swingline

New Member
Sep 18, 2003
1,252
0
0
TCB - Taking Care of Business
Mar 7, 2004
#12
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #12
So if somone has the Stock MAF but buys an after throttle body they will have gains, correct? If so about how much?
Click to expand...


I noticed a slight difference when I put on my 65mm FRPP throttle body but it also went on with CAI and a Cobra intake. I have the stock MAF and will keep it until I pound out what mods I am going to do.
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Mar 7, 2004
#13
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #13
Mostly all of the gain you felt would be from the Cobra intake. I would be suprised for a TB to give more than 5rwhp on a stock heads, cam car.

Jake
 

swingline

New Member
Sep 18, 2003
1,252
0
0
TCB - Taking Care of Business
Mar 7, 2004
#14
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #14
In all honesty, I don't feel that big of a difference with the Cobra. I am still running stock heads and cam though.
 
S

stangsman

Member
Nov 24, 2003
45
1
8
Mar 8, 2004
#15
  • Mar 8, 2004
  • #15
Thanks

Thanks for all your input guys. I have 90K miles on the stang and I would like for one day do a total rebuild. So I'm keeping it a stocker for now. But I would like to build my own CAI. I've seen many threads on the subject, but can anyone tell me how I would incorporate the IAT sensor and breather hose in the set up and would I have to do any cutting to the inner fender?
Thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
738
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
376
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
A
For Sale 2018-2023 C&L MAF and CAI Racer Kit for GT
  • alilpsi
  • Apr 14, 2024
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
1
Views
627
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Apr 14, 2024
alilpsi
A
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
722
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
655
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?