• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Write up on the new 2011 5.0 engine

  • Thread starter Thread starter Black95GTS
  • Start date Start date Dec 29, 2009

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Dec 29, 2009
#1
  • Dec 29, 2009
  • #1
Deep Dive: Ford's all-new 5.0 V8 — Autoblog

Pretty good read. I love the idea of the new engine, although it doesn't sound too after-market friendly. Hyper-crap pistons and a stock compression ratio of 11:1.

Adam
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,293
1,634
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 29, 2009
#2
  • Dec 29, 2009
  • #2
Hypereutectic pistons get an undeserved bad rap. They are actually better on daily driven cars especially ones that Ford has to put a warranty on.

Kurt
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Dec 29, 2009
#3
  • Dec 29, 2009
  • #3
revhead347 said:
Hypereutectic pistons get an undeserved bad rap. They are actually better on daily driven cars especially ones that Ford has to put a warranty on.

Kurt
Click to expand...

Ok. Why?
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Dec 30, 2009
#4
  • Dec 30, 2009
  • #4
All I know is that when I saw a 400+ HP NA engine, my first thought was "Blower! 600 Horse with a bolt on!" then I read it was 11:1. Then my next thought was "Nitrous!" then I read it had hyper pistons.

It ought to be a 12 second ride. I'm just hoping it doesn't weigh 4000 pounds.

Adam
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
40
98
MAINE
Dec 30, 2009
#5
  • Dec 30, 2009
  • #5
Black95GTS said:
It ought to be a 12 second ride. I'm just hoping it doesn't weigh 4000 pounds.

Adam
Click to expand...


It probably will. Seems like all the auto makers are upping the HP along w/ the weight so you dont really gain any ground at all. IE the 400+ HP charger that runs 13's
 

rj95svt

Member
Jan 11, 2007
422
0
16
Hayden, AL
Dec 30, 2009
#6
  • Dec 30, 2009
  • #6
The engine supposedly only gained 10-20lbs over the 3v which is all in the heads and tivct. The only real weight gain should be that and the weight gained from the 6 speed. I don't think it will be very much.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Dec 30, 2009
#7
  • Dec 30, 2009
  • #7
i want one really really bad now after reading that.
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Dec 30, 2009
#8
  • Dec 30, 2009
  • #8
http://blogs.insideline.com/straightline/2011_mustang_ill_ford_fe_9998_3.jpg

This says 3603 pounds curb weight... throw in 50-60 pounds of fluids and you're looking at 3650ish. Not toooo bad considering the competition, but it could easily be 300 pounds lighter IMO. Don't know what wheel/tire package or stereo package this weight reflects.

Adam
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,293
1,634
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 30, 2009
#9
  • Dec 30, 2009
  • #9
Pokageek said:
Ok. Why?
Click to expand...

Hypereutectic pistons are actually quite strong, but very brittle. They don't expand and contract very much, which makes them ideal for a car with tight tollerances, like this new engine. You could put forged pistons in the car yourself, but you won't be able to get those 10,000 mile oil change intervals, and the engine will wear out faster. It would be worth it if you are really pushing the engine, but not on a stock engine. Hyper pistons are actually lighter than forged pistons too, which give the car a slight power advantage, and better fuel economy. It's a marginal difference, but when you compound that with lower costs as well, it just makes sense to use them.

I would say you could put a 150 shot on that engine with no problem, even with those pistons. I don't see this car getting any heavier than it already is. Remember, the new Camaro has a 415hp engine and is only a tenth faster in the 1/4 as the current 315hp Mustang. So this car ought to be a rocket ship with this engine.

Kurt
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Dec 31, 2009
#10
  • Dec 31, 2009
  • #10
revhead347 said:
I would say you could put a 150 shot on that engine with no problem, even with those pistons. I don't see this car getting any heavier than it already is. Remember, the new Camaro has a 415hp engine and is only a tenth faster in the 1/4 as the current 315hp Mustang. So this car F'ING BETTER BE a rocket ship with this engine.

Kurt
Click to expand...

Fixed it for you.

Adam
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Dec 31, 2009
#11
  • Dec 31, 2009
  • #11
revhead347 said:
Hypereutectic pistons are actually quite strong, but very brittle. They don't expand and contract very much, which makes them ideal for a car with tight tollerances, like this new engine. You could put forged pistons in the car yourself, but you won't be able to get those 10,000 mile oil change intervals, and the engine will wear out faster. It would be worth it if you are really pushing the engine, but not on a stock engine. Hyper pistons are actually lighter than forged pistons too, which give the car a slight power advantage, and better fuel economy. It's a marginal difference, but when you compound that with lower costs as well, it just makes sense to use them.

...

Kurt
Click to expand...
Thanks for the education. Good stuff. ..

p.s. In my "dealings" with nitrous which was small and highly controlled, I found a 150 shot to really equal like..110 or so..
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,293
1,634
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 31, 2009
#12
  • Dec 31, 2009
  • #12
Yeah, should pick up something like that at the rear wheels.

Kurt
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Jan 1, 2010
#13
  • Jan 1, 2010
  • #13
It depends on what size motor is being used with n2o. Most n2o hp levels are based on a engine volume of a 350/351. More volume....more hp as more n2o to fill that volume. Less volume....less hp will be seen. Also add that many n2o companies rate/get their hp levels at the crank and most real world people see numbers at the wheels/times at the track you will have a loss from the drivetrain.

Hyper pistons are not as forgiving as forged but not garbage either. Just because its forged does not mean its indestructible either.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,293
1,634
214
Acworth, GA
Jan 1, 2010
#14
  • Jan 1, 2010
  • #14
There is one builder named Keith Black who swears by hypereutectic pistons. All of his performance pistons are hypereutectic.

A 150 shot of N2O is whatever jet size that it takes to make 150hp at the crank. If one companies 150 shot makes more power than another's, it's because they are using a bigger jet, and more nitrous. The science is that simple.

Kurt
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
Jan 2, 2010
#15
  • Jan 2, 2010
  • #15
If the 3603lb curb weight is correct (31lb more than the 2010 GT), the 412hp 2011 GT should hit the 1/4 mile in about 12.7-12.8, which is a couple of tenths faster than the Camaro SS.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jan 3, 2010
#16
  • Jan 3, 2010
  • #16
I have heard of folks drilling out the nitrous nozzles too..hhehe .. an old redneck trick if they want more I guess.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Jan 3, 2010
#17
  • Jan 3, 2010
  • #17
Drilling out the nozzle is a good idea if your running larger than a 150 shot in most cases. After talking with a N.O.S. R&D guy, the nozzles in most cases have a hole that is roughly the size of a 150 shot and many companies have std. nozzles like this. This is a large reason why you see people who just do not run that much better with a 175+ jet in place of a 150 jet. There are nozzles out there with larger dia. holes in the nozzles, they tend to be higher price non-std nozzles. These and drilling nozzles is part of how many n2o single nozzle class cars can get 300+ hp out of a single nozzle.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,293
1,634
214
Acworth, GA
Jan 3, 2010
#18
  • Jan 3, 2010
  • #18
Pokageek said:
I have heard of folks drilling out the nitrous nozzles too..hhehe .. an old redneck trick if they want more I guess.
Click to expand...

There are nozzles available that are so big, it's just not necessary. People used to do that back in the day when bigger nitrous nozzles hadn't been invented yet. I had a few friends that did it.

Kurt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
149
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
A
Help with engine issues/emissions
  • Artyom
  • Apr 11, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 12, 2024
Mindseye007
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?