• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

x pipe or prochamber

  • Thread starter Thread starter 02 Black Gt
  • Start date Start date Dec 27, 2003
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
0

02 Black Gt

Founding Member
Mar 26, 2002
155
0
0
Dec 27, 2003
#1
  • Dec 27, 2003
  • #1
im going to be changing my exhaust. i currently have an o/r h pipe and flows dumped. i want to change either to an x pipe or a prochamber. whats the pros and cons of each. i will be using a magnaflow cat back system. for an x pipe i was thinking maganaflow as well. i want an o/r x pipe. i also currently have bbk shorty headers which i will be keeping. any help is greatly appreciated
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 27, 2003
#2
  • Dec 27, 2003
  • #2
Well...your screen name show you have an 02 GT......you might want to try looking into the 4.6 forums and they could give you more opinions....

I know on my 2000 GT I went with the Prochamber because you simply can't beat the sound in my opinion on a 4.6
 
0

02 Black Gt

Founding Member
Mar 26, 2002
155
0
0
Dec 27, 2003
#3
  • Dec 27, 2003
  • #3
i should have included my sig. this is for my 92
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 28, 2003
#4
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #4
I was wondering....I figured you had a 5.0 but I was just playing it safe

Actually I would still stick with the Prochamber....a guy I know had a longtubes, prochamber, and mac catback on his 95 and it sounded dang good

David
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 28, 2003
#5
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #5
I started a thread about a month ago and there was over 100 replies. Just search it. It is full of stuff.
 
0

02 Black Gt

Founding Member
Mar 26, 2002
155
0
0
Dec 28, 2003
#6
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #6
i had heard that a prochamber sounds like a mix between a h pipe and an x pipe. i like the sound of both pipes but i want somethng a little differnet then what everyone else has (h pipe). i like the sound of the raspy x pipe butl ike the deep rumble of an h pipe. i wish i could have both. im leaning towards the procahmber
 

HaggardGT

New Member
Dec 16, 2003
59
0
0
Tolland, CT
Dec 28, 2003
#7
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #7
PROCHAMBER! You can hear the cam clear as hell even if it's stock with a prochamber.
 

Whytry91

New Member
Nov 26, 2002
321
0
0
Morrisville, NC
Dec 28, 2003
#8
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #8
i have bassani x with a magnaflow cat-back I like it a lot,

I have a link in my signature if you want to hear it,
 

Fox Saleen 163

New Member
Dec 5, 2003
286
0
0
San Diego, CA
Dec 28, 2003
#9
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #9
I have an idea... go to www.mustangexhaust.com and find out what the prochamber sounds like.
 
0

02 Black Gt

Founding Member
Mar 26, 2002
155
0
0
Dec 28, 2003
#10
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #10
i like the sound of the prochamber. i was hoping they would have had the setup i wanted. where is the cheapest place to buy a prochamber.
 

Imyourzero

Learned that lesson as a horny teenager with lots
Founding Member
Mar 10, 2002
2,298
0
0
Hoonose, U.S.A. Posts: 39,051
Dec 30, 2003
#11
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #11
02 Black Gt said:
i had heard that a prochamber sounds like a mix between a h pipe and an x pipe. i like the sound of both pipes but i want somethng a little differnet then what everyone else has (h pipe). i like the sound of the raspy x pipe butl ike the deep rumble of an h pipe. i wish i could have both. im leaning towards the procahmber
Click to expand...

In my opinion, you'd be happy with the ProChamber then. I parked my 94 w/ProChamber next to my buddy's 95 w/MAC offroad H pipe, and mine had a deeper, more "muscular" idle. Part of that could have been due to my 3.5" tips though; he has 2 1/4" or 2 1/2" tips but I'm not sure how much of a difference that makes in the sound.

It sounds good all the way up thru the RPM's. I also don't know why people say the ProChamber is quiet. It may not be as loud as an X, but it's certainly not quiet. My car gets too much attention as it is from the exhaust...I'm not sure I'd want anything louder!
 

Whytry91

New Member
Nov 26, 2002
321
0
0
Morrisville, NC
Dec 30, 2003
#12
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #12
i think you'd be happy with the prochamber, definately sounds nice, it was a little louder that my neighbors would like to handle so I went with the x, still echoes off their houses though
 

Fox Saleen 163

New Member
Dec 5, 2003
286
0
0
San Diego, CA
Dec 30, 2003
#13
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #13
I installed a Dr Gas X pipe yesterday... It sounds pretty mean, and different. It did make the exhuast a little quieter from my previous offroad pipe, but once I get the headers, heads, cam, and magnapacks that should change.
 
0

02 Black Gt

Founding Member
Mar 26, 2002
155
0
0
Jan 1, 2004
#14
  • Jan 1, 2004
  • #14
im pretty sure im going to go with the prochamber. do they make the magnapacks for fox bodies. i didnt think they did. anybody no some good places with good prices to get the prochamber and magnalfow catback.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 1, 2004
#15
  • Jan 1, 2004
  • #15
They both sound good and make good power....custom x-pipe, dynomax bullets, mac long tubes here....sounds unreal.
 

bgjohnson

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
963
0
16
johnston,iowa
Jan 2, 2004
#16
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #16
so where did you get em?
 

rx7speed

New Member
Apr 11, 2003
314
0
0
wankel wonderland
Jan 2, 2004
#17
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #17
I find this funny

this board seems fairly anti rice
yet this talk about a prochamber vs x-pipe and out of all the replies I think only ONE person said anything about power


the rest talk about sound


sounds like rice to me


oh yeah I think someone wanted the black kettle back
 

Whytry91

New Member
Nov 26, 2002
321
0
0
Morrisville, NC
Jan 2, 2004
#18
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #18
rx7speed said:
I find this funny

this board seems fairly anti rice
yet this talk about a prochamber vs x-pipe and out of all the replies I think only ONE person said anything about power


the rest talk about sound


sounds like rice to me


oh yeah I think someone wanted the black kettle back
Click to expand...


I think your wrong, everyone on here does their research and they all know that no matter which one they pick they tend to only gain like 3 hp on a basically stock engine to if your lucky 10 - 15 on a modded car. so that is why you here about sound because that is the only relative difference between any of these pipes, except for marginal torque gains/losses.

rice no - "sound advice" yes
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jan 2, 2004
#19
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #19
rx7speed said:
I find this funny

this board seems fairly anti rice
yet this talk about a prochamber vs x-pipe and out of all the replies I think only ONE person said anything about power


the rest talk about sound


sounds like rice to me


oh yeah I think someone wanted the black kettle back
Click to expand...


that's a pretty ballsy statement, aside from the fact that just about every performance muffler on the market makes nearly the same power numbers, give or take a hp here or there, which i'd say just about anyone would sacrifice for a better sounding muffler.


The difference here is, stock mustangs make power, performance exhaust add a little power and sound.

Stock ricecars sound like crap, and a fartcan in the back just sounds like pissed off bees in a popcan.

Can a muffler add power to a car that was manufactured with gas mileage and economy in mind? Probably. Can a muffler add power and *better* sound than a Mustang would normally have? Absolutely.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jan 2, 2004
#20
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #20
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
that's a pretty ballsy statement, aside from the fact that just about every performance muffler on the market makes nearly the same power numbers, give or take a hp here or there, which i'd say just about anyone would sacrifice for a better sounding muffler.


The difference here is, stock mustangs make power, performance exhaust add a little power and sound.

Stock ricecars sound like crap, and a fartcan in the back just sounds like pissed off bees in a popcan.

Can a muffler add power to a car that was manufactured with gas mileage and economy in mind? Probably. Can a muffler add power and *better* sound than a Mustang would normally have? Absolutely.
Click to expand...

Besides man, if you're gonna shell out the beans, why not decide on the sound you're gonna hear every time you drive?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Mid Pipe
  • 93gtmustang
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
241
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 21, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
New guy- first Stang- I love it !!
  • smid333
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
137
The Welcome Wagon Mar 23, 2026
smid333
S
R
bbk shorty header to mid pipe gasket
  • randyyy
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
313
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2025
randyyy
R
Fox BBK X-pipe replacement Cat?
  • TIGGER
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
264
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
83
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?