• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

X-Pipe vs. H-Pipe

  • Thread starter Thread starter coachfarnen
  • Start date Start date Oct 31, 2011

coachfarnen

New Member
Oct 31, 2011
4
0
0
Oct 31, 2011
#1
  • Oct 31, 2011
  • #1
Sorry guys but I thought I would get the most responses in this forum about the exhaust for my 99' Saleen S-351.... I have an off road H-Pipe on there now but I've had this nice stainless Bassani X-Pipe sitting around doing nothing. I really like the sound of the H but I'm curious about the sound of the X. To me if I pick up 10 horse running the Bassani it's not a big deal. I'd rather sacrifice power for sound. Plus the X has a nice stainless look. So, the question is... How much tone at lower and higher Rpms could I possibly lose using the X vs the H??? Thanks
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Oct 31, 2011
#2
  • Oct 31, 2011
  • #2
It's impossible to say unless we know what catback you are running.

The power difference between an X and H pipe on a sub-400 rwhp car is not measurable. You will lose/gain nothing switching between the two.
 

03_TrueBlue_GT

Active Member
May 5, 2010
810
41
29
Houston, Tx
Oct 31, 2011
#3
  • Oct 31, 2011
  • #3
Its all based off preference, just for the hell of it install the X and see if you like it. Then you can mak your decision. Personally I loved the sound of an X piped Mustang but when I had my UPR X pipe on my car I hated driving with it bc my car is a DD. Now I have the Prochamber H pipe and I love it because its loud when I go WOT.
 

Sonic04GT

Member
Nov 1, 2009
844
2
19
West Palm Beach, FL
Oct 31, 2011
#4
  • Oct 31, 2011
  • #4
I noticed less rasp with the H-pipe and prefer that over the X I had. Not too noticeable in the videos but here's a couple. The rasp was mainly while shifting or on deceleration. Annoyed me.

Magnaflow catback, Magnaflow O/R X, stock manifolds
2004 Mustang GT Magnaflow Exhaust - YouTube

Magnaflow catback, BBK O/R H, BBK Longtubes
2004 Mustang GT Dyno Tuning - YouTube

Overall I liked the sound of both though. I've been wanting to hear a ProChamber with Magnaflows and longtubes.
 

VortechEdge

Member
Oct 22, 2011
38
1
8
Oklahoma
Oct 31, 2011
#5
  • Oct 31, 2011
  • #5
I have a Bassani X-pipe and love it, I'd suggest putting it on and atleast giving it a try.
 

coachfarnen

New Member
Oct 31, 2011
4
0
0
Oct 31, 2011
#6
  • Oct 31, 2011
  • #6
sneaky98gt said:
It's impossible to say unless we know what catback you are running.

The power difference between an X and H pipe on a sub-400 rwhp car is not measurable. You will lose/gain nothing switching between the two.
Click to expand...

The exhaust from Header to tip is as follows... Ceramic coated factory Saleen unequal length headers, Standard off-road H (no cats), Stainess (I believe 3") pipes up to Flowmasters out to straight pipes....
 

coachfarnen

New Member
Oct 31, 2011
4
0
0
Oct 31, 2011
#7
  • Oct 31, 2011
  • #7
Standard H vs Mac Prochamber.....

From what I'm reading here it sounds like the pipe of choice nowadays is the Prochamber as far as sound is concerned. I don't mind the drone and thoroghly love the cruising sound between say 1800-3000 rpm that the standard H provides right now. Will I notice a measurable difference between a standard H and the Prochamber???? Thanks
 

Stumbaugh

Member
May 13, 2010
903
13
19
Russellville, Ar
Oct 31, 2011
#8
  • Oct 31, 2011
  • #8
I have had an H pipe, prochamber, and X pipe. X pipe is my favorite. I can put up with the raspy sound down low for the absolute pure sex sound in the higher RPM's.
 

Stumbaugh

Member
May 13, 2010
903
13
19
Russellville, Ar
Oct 31, 2011
#9
  • Oct 31, 2011
  • #9
I shift my car at about 2,200rpm anyways, so I never hear the raspy part of the exhaust.
 

coachfarnen

New Member
Oct 31, 2011
4
0
0
Oct 31, 2011
#10
  • Oct 31, 2011
  • #10
Stumbaugh said:
I have had an H pipe, prochamber, and X pipe. X pipe is my favorite. I can put up with the raspy sound down low for the absolute pure sex sound in the higher RPM's.
Click to expand...

Def. going to try and bolt this baby up this week and give the X a shot....
What I'm wodering now is if there's a difference between the old school regular H and the Mac Prochamber?
 

1987stangman

Member
Jul 12, 2006
684
24
19
Oct 31, 2011
#11
  • Oct 31, 2011
  • #11
Stumbaugh said:
I shift my car at about 2,200rpm anyways, so I never hear the raspy part of the exhaust.
Click to expand...

I don't see how. The X is raspy at any RPM IMO.

It all comes down to what the individual likes in terms of sound. I had an X for 2 years and 2 cat back setups and hated both. The X sounds good at higher RPM but like ass down low. Once i swiched to an H I found that it's a more lower toned mellow note.

With that said. I personally think that when coupled to the right cat back an X can sound bad ass and the same goes for an H to some degree but you have less of a chance of screwing that up.

When DD my 87' GT with BBK shorties, Flowmaster cat back, and a MAC o/r H I personally think that it sounds 1000 times better than my 2V ever has even with the PI engine.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Oct 31, 2011
#12
  • Oct 31, 2011
  • #12
UPR X and Mac Flowpath's here... sounds sinister.
 

Stumbaugh

Member
May 13, 2010
903
13
19
Russellville, Ar
Oct 31, 2011
#13
  • Oct 31, 2011
  • #13
Yeah I remember hearing your car at Mustang Week burningrubber. Sounds good.

To me, the only time they are raspy, is when they hit about 2500-2800 rpm. Even that doesn't bother me.
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Nov 1, 2011
#14
  • Nov 1, 2011
  • #14
That 351 is going to sound nothing like a 2v motor. I'd ask the fox body guys. On most motors, I always like the H-pipe, espeically the pushrod Fords. Good luck.
 

Twista

Active Member
May 7, 2004
510
2
29
@ the z00 in chicago
Nov 1, 2011
#15
  • Nov 1, 2011
  • #15
my 5.0 pushrod with o/r X and spintech mufflers
Cant really tell its an o/r X during the revving, but yes there is rasp
SAM_0766.AVI - YouTube

But i suggest you get the o/r H
 

slayerripkdc

15 Year Member
Jun 3, 2003
1,341
16
59
brewster ny
Nov 1, 2011
#16
  • Nov 1, 2011
  • #16
Post pics of this 351 saleen!
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Nov 1, 2011
#17
  • Nov 1, 2011
  • #17
I've had both and I happen to really like the bassy tone of the h-pipe over the scream of the x-pipe. Even in the upper RPM's the h-pipe gives off a really nice bassy note coupled with the high pitched mechanical symphony of the OHC V-8. In low-mid RPM's is where the h-pipe really shines. It sounds so damn good and aggressive
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
H-PIPE WIDTH
  • forango
  • May 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
305
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 28, 2025
LILCBRA
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
998
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?