• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Yet another intake question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter CManT1914
  • Start date Start date Aug 12, 2004

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Aug 12, 2004
#1
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #1
Ok, I searched, but couldn't find exactly what I was looking for. I am looking for a new intake, and have narrowed it down to either the Edelbrock Performer 5.0, or the Trick Flow Street intake. I know the Performer is supposed to add 37 hp, is that flywheel, or rear-wheel? Another thing, how does the Street compare to the Performer? Does anybody know how much it is supposed to add? The TFS is also noticeably cheaper ($100)

I want to set-up my engine for low-end power, but I wouldn't mind some more top-end. Do these two help and at all around 4500+? I also don't want to have to do heads and a cam soon, so I'm going with these which are supposed to work well with the stock ones.

So let me know your thoughts on these. Thanks

- Chris
 
L

lietuvis91

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
102
0
0
NO, LA
Aug 12, 2004
#2
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #2
Are you seriuos??? an intake is supposed to add 37hp???? damn, I need to get one then!!! Hey someone provide some info PLEASE!!!!
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Aug 12, 2004
#3
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #3
lietuvis91 said:
Are you seriuos??? an intake is supposed to add 37hp???? damn, I need to get one then!!! Hey someone provide some info PLEASE!!!!
Click to expand...

YEA!!! The Edelbrock Performer 5.0 intake adds 37 HP to a STOCK 5.0! Even if that is flywheel, that is awesome! That's why I was wondering about the TFS, cus I don't feel like shelling out $500 for the Performer.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Aug 12, 2004
#4
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #4
lietuvis91 said:
Are you seriuos??? an intake is supposed to add 37hp???? damn, I need to get one then!!! Hey someone provide some info PLEASE!!!!
Click to expand...

Not a cold air intake by the way. An intake manifold.
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Aug 12, 2004
#5
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #5
idk how much power it really added but i am VERY happy with my performer manifold...it would be a nice addition th your car...and yes the car will pull MUCH better 4500+


Anthony
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Aug 12, 2004
#6
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #6
VIPERn94Five-0 said:
and yes the car will pull MUCH better 4500+
Click to expand...

That's good to know, but is there anybody with the Trick Flow intake?
 

Mrgreen94gt

SIMMA DA NA!!!
Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
448
0
0
West TN
Aug 12, 2004
#7
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #7
If you're looking for low-end out of those two, then you should go with the Performer. The small, high-flowing runners offer great velocity. The Trick Flow has a similar/identicle runner length but they are much bigger which loses velocity. The only comparison that I have is between my car and a fox 5.0 with identicle mods with the only difference being the intake. Be a better comparison if we switched the intakes back and forth, but it's kind of impractical. My power improved right off idle and became a lot punchier all around. His car, with the TFS, didn't change at all from stock below 3,000 RPM (i.e. no torque or throttle response loss-just no gain) At around 3,000, it would come alive.
 
L

lietuvis91

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
102
0
0
NO, LA
Aug 13, 2004
#8
  • Aug 13, 2004
  • #8
WOW, just an intake does this, NICE! I knew mustangs make power fairly easy, so I guess this is an example. I'll have to look into getting one. But is this hp rwhp or at the crank???
 
L

LR5.0

New Member
Jun 28, 2004
56
0
0
Aug 13, 2004
#9
  • Aug 13, 2004
  • #9
i hate to be the spoil sport on the 37hp gain but that gain was given when mmff magazine installed a supercharger on a stock 5.0 and then they changed the stock manifold for an edelbrock intake and picked up 37hp. otherwise the performer added 12hp to the wheels on a stock motor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
667
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
189
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
644
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?