• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

z-bar to Hyd clutch

  • Thread starter Thread starter tt400
  • Start date Start date Jul 25, 2011
T

tt400

New Member
Jul 7, 2011
6
0
1
Jul 25, 2011
#1
  • Jul 25, 2011
  • #1
I have a 1965 that was an original 3-speed manual car that the previous ower has converted over to a t-5. It looks as though he has used the original bellhousing and clutch fork. I want to convert this over to a hyd clutch. Do I need to change out the a late model mustang bellhousing and clutch fork or is there a kit made to keep the original?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jul 25, 2011
#2
  • Jul 25, 2011
  • #2
there is probably a kit available to keep the original bell housing, but why? a bell from a 5.0 works great with the hydraulic clutch kit that dazecars sell on his website.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jul 25, 2011
#3
  • Jul 25, 2011
  • #3
tt400 said:
I want to convert this over to a hyd clutch.
Click to expand...

Um, why?
 
T

tt400

New Member
Jul 7, 2011
6
0
1
Jul 25, 2011
#4
  • Jul 25, 2011
  • #4
I would like to keep the original bellhousing in the car because the T5 and the Zbar setup is already in the car. I want to convert this to hyd for my wife to drive.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jul 25, 2011
#5
  • Jul 25, 2011
  • #5
There is no inherent reason you current setup couldn't be driven by your wife. There's probably something wrong with it.

Coupla years ago I repaired the pedal bracket in a 69 428 Cobra Jet. Clutch was so bad I nearly had to use both feet to push it in to move the car.

Pedal pivots in the bracket were shot, and the clutch pedal pivot shaft was trashed.

I installed a new shaft, repaired bracket, and a Scott Drake roller bearing conversion kit. With no change to the Z-bar or clutch, it was then easy enough that a 12-year-old girl could have easily pressed and held the clutch in. Total cost in parts, about $60.
 
T

tt400

New Member
Jul 7, 2011
6
0
1
Jul 25, 2011
#6
  • Jul 25, 2011
  • #6
I am also looking to add headers and power steering so I am going the direction of the hydro clutch.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jul 26, 2011
#7
  • Jul 26, 2011
  • #7
Headers would be unlikely to interfere with your clutch, everybody I knew in the 70's had headers and 4-speeds, including me. Power steering would have zero interference with your clutch. There has to be another reason to spend all that money on a hydraulic clutch.

If your problem is the pedal bracket situation I described, even a hydraulic clutch would work like crap until that's fixed. Fix the problem first. Then decide if a modification is needed.
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
Jul 26, 2011
#8
  • Jul 26, 2011
  • #8
tt400 said:
I have a 1965 that was an original 3-speed manual car that the previous ower has converted over to a t-5. It looks as though he has used the original bellhousing and clutch fork. I want to convert this over to a hyd clutch. Do I need to change out the a late model mustang bellhousing and clutch fork or is there a kit made to keep the original?
Click to expand...


Hi,

As commented by 2+2GT, Why change? put the $300, into some other improvement prospect. When maintained, the "Z" bar works just fine. It's a simple design, that's not prone "leaks" and seal replacement.
 

horseballz

10 Year Member
Sep 30, 2009
824
19
49
Las Vegas, NV
Jul 26, 2011
#9
  • Jul 26, 2011
  • #9
He is likely planning/referring to Borgeson power steering, although, if car is 64-1/2 to 66, Borgeson now offers a modified Z-Bar for use with their power steering boxes. For what it's worth, I really like my hydraulic clutch and prefer hydraulics to mechanical any day.
My $.02,
Gene
 

65fastbackresto

Active Member
Apr 13, 2007
1,229
7
39
AR
Jul 26, 2011
#10
  • Jul 26, 2011
  • #10
I used Modern Driveline for my hydraulic setup

Call Bruce at 408-394-3944. He has a hydraulic cylinder relocation kit he can sell you (along with everything else) that`ll make your pedal where a 4 year old kid could push it down. It`s also mounted to the right side of the master cylinder which means it will never be in the way of further upgrades.

My car was pretty hard to drive before I did this same setup, now its fun.
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
Jul 26, 2011
#11
  • Jul 26, 2011
  • #11
horseballz said:
He is likely planning/referring to Borgeson power steering, although, if car is 64-1/2 to 66, Borgeson now offers a modified Z-Bar for use with their power steering boxes. For what it's worth, I really like my hydraulic clutch and prefer hydraulics to mechanical any day.
My $.02,
Gene
Click to expand...

Yes, the hydraulic systems are very smooth as I have this system in my Etype.
If it it's true he's changing other components that may interfere with the traditional "Z" bar, then, a hydraulic system may be the way to go.
Bruce has a very nice hydraulic system. It was still in development when I made the conversion in 2009.
Happy Trails!
 

65fastbackresto

Active Member
Apr 13, 2007
1,229
7
39
AR
Jul 26, 2011
#12
  • Jul 26, 2011
  • #12
He perfected it finally.

I had one of Bruce`s earlier setups and it was a pretty hard pedal, but he moved the hydraulic cylinder over to where its mounted directly under where the wiring harness goes thru the firewall about where all the brakelines are tied together. It`s pretty sweet now. I can snap some pics if yall wanna see it.
 
T

tt400

New Member
Jul 7, 2011
6
0
1
Jul 26, 2011
#13
  • Jul 26, 2011
  • #13
I already have all the parts for the hyd clutch from Daze. I purchased these before I found out that I have the older bellhousing. I do not want to keep the zbar.
If I do need the 87-93 mustang bellhousing do i also need to change out the clutch, flywheel and starter?
 

hipo_p51

Member
Jun 13, 2008
199
2
19
Jul 27, 2011
#14
  • Jul 27, 2011
  • #14
I have a hyd clutch on my car. If i had it all to do over again i would stick with the z-bar.
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
Jul 27, 2011
#15
  • Jul 27, 2011
  • #15
hipo_p51 said:
I have a hyd clutch on my car. If i had it all to do over again i would stick with the z-bar.
Click to expand...

Hi,
I run a "Z" system, as well. So, what about the hydraulic setup, do you not like?
 
T

tt400

New Member
Jul 7, 2011
6
0
1
Jul 27, 2011
#16
  • Jul 27, 2011
  • #16
Does anyone know the answer to the question about keeping the existing clutch, flywheel and starter?
Thanks
 

hipo_p51

Member
Jun 13, 2008
199
2
19
Jul 27, 2011
#17
  • Jul 27, 2011
  • #17
PoppyMod said:
Hi,
I run a "Z" system, as well. So, what about the hydraulic setup, do you not like?
Click to expand...

I have not seen a huge improvement. the setup is adjusted properly and has run flawless for the past 2 1/2 years. however the pros dont out weigh the possible cons. I run a toploader and the release piston mounts to the trans inside the bellhousing. any leak in there will require a lot of labor to fix. however I am ready to ditch the hyd for my old Z set if it ever happens. That is my only real complaint. also i am still a little annoyed with myself that i caved into this which required drilling holes in my virgin firewall to mount this thing.
 

65fastbackresto

Active Member
Apr 13, 2007
1,229
7
39
AR
Jul 27, 2011
#18
  • Jul 27, 2011
  • #18
tt400

Call Bruce at Modern Driveline, thats what he does everyday.
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
Jul 27, 2011
#19
  • Jul 27, 2011
  • #19
tt400 said:
I have a 1965 that was an original 3-speed manual car that the previous ower has converted over to a t-5. It looks as though he has used the original bellhousing and clutch fork. I want to convert this over to a hyd clutch. Do I need to change out the a late model mustang bellhousing and clutch fork or is there a kit made to keep the original?
Click to expand...

Hi,
I will offer, your definitive answer will com form Bruce @ ModernDriveline Give him the details. I did the conversion, but, chose to stick with Z bar. I don't recall a need to change hardware, when I discussed Hyd option.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jul 27, 2011
#20
  • Jul 27, 2011
  • #20
Dunno about the specific kit you have, but I have seen hydraulics that would use either bell, and the clutch you have.

As for the differences, I used to drive both a 66 289HP with stock clutch, and supercharged Thunderbird with hydraulic clutch. Felt the same to me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
607
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
A
Need some info on putting a 2002 4.6l in a 1997 gt.
  • Austin4.6l
  • May 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
141
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2025
Austin4.6l
A
Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
309
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
K
TKX Transmission Shifting Problem
  • KWC156
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Jun 13, 2026
427nostang
4
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
69
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?