• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Zero Balance Windsor crankshaft?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zenboy99
  • Start date Start date Dec 4, 2004

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Dec 4, 2004
#1
  • Dec 4, 2004
  • #1
Can you get a zero balanced Windsor stroker crank? Or do they all have to have a 28oz balancer?
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Dec 4, 2004
#2
  • Dec 4, 2004
  • #2
The balances are to help with engine turnover by means of centrifical forces. Even if they did make one, the engine with one would possibly have a stalling issue or a rougher/choppy idle.

Early-model 302's use the 28oz balance as well as 351's.
Late-model 302's (the ones most of us are accustomed to) us a 50oz balance.
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
Dec 4, 2004
#3
  • Dec 4, 2004
  • #3
do you have any idea of what youre talking about......

There are plenty cranks you can get. Eagles makes a crank that you can take to zero without adding heavy metal to it.
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Dec 5, 2004
#4
  • Dec 5, 2004
  • #4
TIMMY2734 said:
do you have any idea of what youre talking about......
Click to expand...

No I don't, thats why I posed the question. If there are zero balance cranks out there, then why are so many people running a 28oz balancer?
 
S

SlowGT

Founding Member
Jun 17, 1999
826
0
0
Columbia Co, PA
Dec 5, 2004
#5
  • Dec 5, 2004
  • #5
zenboy99 said:
No I don't, thats why I posed the question. If there are zero balance cranks out there, then why are so many people running a 28oz balancer?
Click to expand...

I think he meant the crankshaft that might cause 'stalling issues or a rough/choppy idle'




So many people use the factory imbalance because they can reuse factory parts and upgrade to better quality as the funds become available. If you use a zero balance crank, you're forced to get a zero balance flywheel/flexplate and harmonic damper. And that'll add an extra $550-700 to the project that may not be necessary.
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
Dec 5, 2004
#6
  • Dec 5, 2004
  • #6
It was to the other guy, not you. But a search may have been useful

To go to zero , you usually need a bunch of mallory to get it there, which adds up pretty quickly. And for most people, the extra cost doesnt really justify going neutral. 28 will be fine and usually cheaper. For a street/strip car, 28 is more than adequate
 

EMW150

Founding Member
May 22, 2000
2,020
1
46
Roaring Spring,PA
Dec 6, 2004
#7
  • Dec 6, 2004
  • #7
TIMMY2734 said:
It was to the other guy, not you. But a search may have been useful

To go to zero , you usually need a bunch of mallory to get it there, which adds up pretty quickly. And for most people, the extra cost doesnt really justify going neutral. 28 will be fine and usually cheaper. For a street/strip car, 28 is more than adequate
Click to expand...

That's exactly right. Mallory is expensive and if you're only spinning to 7k, 0 balance is overkill. 28 on a stroker crank is pretty common because you don't need to cut them up so bad like they do going to 50. I've seen 50 oz balance stroker cranks - Not pretty. I just had the crank for my new 342 balanced to 0 about 3 months ago and I'm thinking it took 3 slugs of Mallory @ $100.00 each. That adds up fast.
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Dec 6, 2004
#8
  • Dec 6, 2004
  • #8
Great, thanks for the info guys. Sorry about the misunderstanding.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
144
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
D
Harmonic Balancer brand, weight?
  • dropteeth
  • Sep 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
215
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 18, 2025
revhead347
B
Acceleration Vibration
  • Blown02svt
  • Dec 31, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
592
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 5, 2026
General karthief
6
Motor ID
  • 65er
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
134
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
Noobz347
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?