Patriots about to get PWNNNNED!! again.

Again, if this is so then how come the last time the Pats beat us was in 2003 when we were down to a 3rd string QB and STILL almost won? :shrug:
.

ohh ok so now we are playing the almost what if game. Lets not even bother to have them play the games anymore, it can all be done on paper b/c almost and what if seems to be good enough
 
OFFENSIVE SIGNALS!!!!!! come on 04 you know better than that.. the were taping offensive groupings

In the commisioners speach last tuesday ( I listened to the whole thing) he stated that it's LEGAL and remians legal to tape signals... just not legal to do so from a location that a member of the coaching staff can access it.. ( remember 3 walls and a roof)

So since walsh admitted that the tapes were in his hands untill AFTER the game was over that eliminates an possible cheating with these tapes if walsh is telling the truth..

I am going to ask you and the rest of hater nation to use some logic on this one..

since it's legal to tape signals ( confirmed by the NFL comissioner) to be used in a later game and the patriots used taped signals in a later game all they did wrong was tape from a illegal location

I said this exact same thing a long time ago but all the haters are to thick headed to pick up on it. They didnt do anything wrong as far as the taping, it was just where it was done from. Im not sure what thread I said this in but it was awhile ago but it all just fell on deaf ears b/c its not the slam dunk that everyone was looking for to sink the patriots.
 
:rlaugh::lol: I don't have a camera with a big lense and all of that stuff, it's a Sony cam that my mom has. If I were to buy a camera for myself, i'd get one with a LOT of zoom and all of that good stuff, but oh well.. I can't complain :D

Most of the pics will come in warm-ups tho.. I'll be too pumped to think about taking pictures during most of the game lol

If you have good seats it wont matter. I belive you are sitting closer then I was last year and all I had was 3.2MP w/ not that much zoom.

View attachment 317058
 
for all anyone knows, teams could have people in the stands using SLR camera's to photograph signals with, and then they email the photos to a coach or somethiing.

so really this whole thing is pointless and without merit.

Funny you bring that up b/c while at the game my phone (verizon) and my brothers (AT&T) would not send text during the game, once it was over they both worked fine so Im pretty sure there is some kind of blocking device used.
 
If you have good seats it wont matter. I belive you are sitting closer then I was last year and all I had was 3.2MP w/ not that much zoom.

View attachment 316968

Freaking sweeeet!!! :hail2: :banana:

I'm gonna be in section 138, row 7. It's by the endzone closest to the light tower and bridge on the Broncos sideline, so hopefully i'll get a chance to get some good shots of Belichick and Brady.

Can you pm me some more pics if you have any?
 
ohh ok so now we are playing the almost what if game. Lets not even bother to have them play the games anymore, it can all be done on paper b/c almost and what if seems to be good enough

I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say. We took you right down to the wire with a 3rd string QB in the same year you won the Super Bowl. Even you can't tell me that doesn't mean something, especially when it's your only win over us since 2000.
 
We've beat the Steelers 5 out of the last 6 times, including beating them at Pittsburgh the year they won the SB (since apparently beating a team the year they win the SB means a lot for some odd reason).

We've beat the Colts 7 out of the last 10 times.

I don't see the point in caring about trends like that with as much change that goes through the league from year to year with free agency and everything.
 
We've beat the Steelers 5 out of the last 6 times, including beating them at Pittsburgh the year they won the SB (since apparently beating a team the year they win the SB means a lot for some odd reason).

We've beat the Colts 7 out of the last 10 times.

I don't see the point in caring about trends like that with as much change that goes through the league from year to year with free agency and everything.

unfortunately, trends do mean quite a bit in the NFL, and it takes quite a bit to reverse a trend or put a stop to it.

until the Pats stop getting owned by the broncos, that trend is one that I will continue to put my money on the Broncos regardless of where they play.
:D
 
unfortunately, trends do mean quite a bit in the NFL, and it takes quite a bit to reverse a trend or put a stop to it.

until the Pats stop getting owned by the broncos, that trend is one that I will continue to put my money on the Broncos regardless of where they play.
:D

Well one good thing for the Pats is the Broncos usually lose in the first round or dont make the playoffs so the Pats rarely see them.
 
ok they have 1 more than the broncos big deal. the cowboys have 2 more than the pats. the 49'ers have 2 more than the Pats. the Steelers have 2 more than the Pats.

so really what's your point?

oh snap.

My point? My point is who's been more successful then the Patriots for the past 7 seasons? When did any of the teams you just mention amount to anything in recent years other then the Steelers superbowl win then falling to the basment.
 
Not trying to take anything away from them, btw. Just saying :shrug:

They got on a hot streak at the right time when the patriots seemed to cool down and just happened to be the team who made a couple more plays that night.