• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

0 Mark On Balancer

  • Thread starter Thread starter JD1964
  • Start date Start date Nov 21, 2016

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,518
194
Maryland
Nov 21, 2016
#1
  • Nov 21, 2016
  • #1
I used a positive stop to find true TDC on my balancer. The current 0 mark was 2 degrees off in the advanced direction. I'll remark and install timing tape so I'm good from here on out.

My brain is struggling (happens frequently). Since my 0 mark was incorrectly advanced by 2 degrees, that means my actual initial timing was 2 degrees more retarded than I thought. Is this correct or do I have it backwards?

The new 0 mark will be 2 degrees on the ATDC side of the factory 0 mark if that helps explain things.
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Nov 21, 2016
#2
  • Nov 21, 2016
  • #2
From your description I would think it was 2° advanced. The crank moves clockwise and the distributor turns counter clockwise. Backwards at the crank is backward at the distributor, which advances timing towards the rotation of spark.

The problem is if slack is in the chain....then what you think is 2° advance timing could be 2° of chain slop.

Wait ! Now I'm confused !!!

How many miles are on it since the timing chain was replaced ?
 
Last edited: Nov 21, 2016

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,518
194
Maryland
Nov 21, 2016
#3
  • Nov 21, 2016
  • #3
90sickfox said:
How many miles are on it since the timing chain was replaced ?
Click to expand...

I'm not measuring timing chain slop. Just true TDC mark on balancer.
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Nov 21, 2016
#4
  • Nov 21, 2016
  • #4
Got it [emoji106] you're right....told you I was confused. Been a long day at work. Smh.

No measuring slack that way. Duh. The piston is connected to the crank.

I'm with you....timing tape all the way. Glad you caught that rare moment of stupidity....you'd think I just started doing this or somethin' smh.
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,518
194
Maryland
Nov 21, 2016
#5
  • Nov 21, 2016
  • #5
90sickfox said:
Got it [emoji106] you're right....told you I was confused. Been a long day at work. Smh.

No measuring slack that way. Duh. The piston is connected to the crank.

I'm with you....timing tape all the way. Glad you caught that rare moment of stupidity....you'd think I just started doing this or somethin' smh.
Click to expand...

I get it...believe me. Plenty a brain fartin goin on over here
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Nov 21, 2016
#6
  • Nov 21, 2016
  • #6
Now that I've thought about it.... Is the balancer in good shape ? These things have been known to slip, but usually the rubber would be pushing out of it.

Sounds like you know what you're doing so I'm sure you checked it.

You'll know when you mark it and put a light on it. If it bounces around you know somethings up.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,832
10,509
203
polk county florida
Nov 21, 2016
#7
  • Nov 21, 2016
  • #7
Aftermarket cam? Some are ground advanced, thats what I read, no not on fb. I remember it from a couple magazine builds. Wait, now I'm confused, your talking about a crank, ok I'll crawl back in my hole.
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,518
194
Maryland
Nov 21, 2016
#8
  • Nov 21, 2016
  • #8
Stock balancer that was part of a balanced rotating assembly via reputable engine builder. It looks good and he didn't mention anything about it. 2 degrees might be withing factory machining errors I suppose.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,832
10,509
203
polk county florida
Nov 21, 2016
#9
  • Nov 21, 2016
  • #9
Don't pay any attention to my previous post. there should be no 2 degree 'tolerance' between piston tdc and 0 on the balancer. Don't know what kind of stop you are using, try this: rotate clock wise till piston touches stop, mark balancer, turn counter clock wise till it stops, mark the balancer, 0 is half the distance btween marks, that should be 0 on the balancer.
But I maybe still canfused, or is that cornfused, crankfused?
Now I have a headache.
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,518
194
Maryland
Nov 21, 2016
#10
  • Nov 21, 2016
  • #10
That's exactly what I did. It was 2 degrees off. There was 1/4" difference between the distances from rotating the crank each way. Chop that difference in half to move the mark over....it comes to just about 2 degrees, or 1/8" distance on the balancer. Try it, you'll see
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,832
10,509
203
polk county florida
Nov 21, 2016
#11
  • Nov 21, 2016
  • #11
Sounds like you did it the same way I was thinking. Maybe try another balancer? If its used maybe it slipped, if its new maybe ring was installed wrong, I thinking keyway is tight. Worse case is a timing tape or just remember its 2 atdc
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,518
194
Maryland
Nov 21, 2016
#12
  • Nov 21, 2016
  • #12
After the measurement verified that it's 2 degrees off, I installed the timing tape offset to make the correction. All good now.
 
Reactions: 90sickfox
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Help with initial Microsquirt ignition setting
  • germain101
  • Nov 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
529
Digital Self-tuning Forum Nov 15, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
356
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
S
Misfire or knock after ignition tune up
  • sleeprtsi
  • Jul 22, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 27, 2024
General karthief
Wanting to replace my BOSS 351C Engine Harmonic Balancer - Questions about 'Balance?'
  • 69machmike
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
564
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 5, 2024
Realmongo
Forced Induction Total Timing under boost
  • Dontknowchit
  • Aug 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
278
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 28, 2025
Dontknowchit
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?