• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

05 gt vs mach1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stangpower1
  • Start date Start date Nov 11, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

RED92VERT

Founding Member
May 31, 2000
74
0
0
Nov 13, 2005
#41
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #41
cleveland said:
All good comments and your exeperiences lead you to believe that the GTs cant stick with the Machs and are simply a bit slower. If you look around a bit more there are plenty of 05 GT owners that ran 13.4 @ 101 right off the bat.

TAKE NOTE, SOMEONE RAN A 13.2 @ 101 WITH AN 05 GT RIGHT OFF THE SHOWROOM FLOOR WITH A 1.8 60 FOOT.

Please share a timeslip that was driven with an 03-04 Mach 1 right off the showroom floor. Im sure there is one out there that ran a 13.2 or so.

-Dan
Click to expand...

It might be possible for a stock 05 GT to run a 13.2, i have just never seen it. But if you honestly believe that a stock 05gt on stock tires ran a 1.8 60ft, you have alot to learn about racing. Unless its fully gutted with full drag suspension thats not going to happen. Unless that track was like glue i say BS. Even on a Nitto dragradial a 1.8 is hard to get with stock suspension. Ive seen alot of 05 gt's at the track and most of them have crazy wheelhop. Also a few guy claim to have hit high 12s in bone stock machs. Im not sure if i completely believe them but one guy claims a 12.89 and a bunch have claimed 12.9s. I did know of a guy who ran a 12.8(whitnessed by other club members) with just a pro 5.0 shifter but thats not bone stock Either way both are awsum cars

Here is a vid of my mach at the track. I had exhaust, gears, 15s and non drag friendly roadrace suspension. 6800rpm launch peeling in every gear
www.mach1media.org/uph/upl/UP12350.wmv
 

cleveland

Founding Member
Feb 19, 2002
579
0
0
SF>...
Nov 13, 2005
#42
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #42
RED92VERT said:
It might be possible for a stock 05 GT to run a 13.2, i have just never seen it. But if you honestly believe that a stock 05gt on stock tires ran a 1.8 60ft, you have alot to learn about racing. Unless its fully gutted with full drag suspension thats not going to happen. Unless that track was like glue i say BS. Even on a Nitto dragradial a 1.8 is hard to get with stock suspension. Ive seen alot of 05 gt's at the track and most of them have crazy wheelhop. Also a few guy claim to have hit high 12s in bone stock machs. Im not sure if i completely believe them but one guy claims a 12.89 and a bunch have claimed 12.9s. I did know of a guy who ran a 12.8(whitnessed by other club members) with just a pro 5.0 shifter but thats not bone stock Either way both are awsum cars

Here is a vid of my mach at the track. I had exhaust, gears, 15s and non drag friendly roadrace suspension. 6800rpm launch peeling in every gear
www.mach1media.org/uph/upl/UP12350.wmv
Click to expand...

Well, you can call BS all you want but the car did just that, ran a 1.8 60 foot. A good driver matters when it comes to drag racing and that run was made by someone with 10 years experience on the strip.

Again, your experiences tell you otherwise about the GT vs Mach 1 debate. Thats fine... if you wish to remain big headed about the subject I could care less. There are more than enough people that trust the idea that the 05+ GT is just as fast as a 03-04 Mach 1.

For those who disagree... get over the nose-in-the-air act already. Its not bad that a GT can match the performance of a Mach 1. They are both awesome cars and 2 very different platforms.

Oh, and commenting on my "knowledge" of drag racing is , at least Im open minded and trust that an improved suspension design can net a "low" 60 foot.

-Dan
 
K

kerg

New Member
Aug 22, 2005
31
0
0
SF Bay Area,CA
Nov 13, 2005
#43
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #43
Question, for Cleveland??

What do you run in the 1/4 mile with all your mods
 

cleveland

Founding Member
Feb 19, 2002
579
0
0
SF>...
Nov 14, 2005
#44
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #44
My last trip to the track netted me with a 13.2 @ 105 with the following performance related mods: jlt short ram intake & jet throttle body spacer | diablo sport tuned spanish oak | frpp 4.10:1 gears | bmr "race" lower control arms & relocation brackets | eibach sportline lowering springs

I wont be making any nitrous runs until I correct my tune and that will be done over the winter.

Mind you Im still on the stock rubber and was spinning all the way through 1st gear and still ran a 2.000 60 foot. I use my very few days at the track (3 total this past season) to dial in my suspension more than anything else.

Im yet to correctly dial in my suspension and I havent had much seat time but Im happy with my results on the track.

I'll make just 1 more appearance at the track this season and I'll be using that day to dial in everything and hopefully hit that 12.5 with my new list of mods and ET Streets.

-Dan
 
K

kerg

New Member
Aug 22, 2005
31
0
0
SF Bay Area,CA
Nov 14, 2005
#45
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #45
sears or sac and what day
 

cleveland

Founding Member
Feb 19, 2002
579
0
0
SF>...
Nov 14, 2005
#46
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #46
I've been to 1 Wednesday Night Drags but I like the Friday Test & Tunes much better. That last "best" trip was a T'nT @ Sacramento.

-Dan
 

RED92VERT

Founding Member
May 31, 2000
74
0
0
Nov 14, 2005
#47
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #47
cleveland said:
Well, you can call BS all you want but the car did just that, ran a 1.8 60 foot. A good driver matters when it comes to drag racing and that run was made by someone with 10 years experience on the strip.

Again, your experiences tell you otherwise about the GT vs Mach 1 debate. Thats fine... if you wish to remain big headed about the subject I could care less. There are more than enough people that trust the idea that the 05+ GT is just as fast as a 03-04 Mach 1.

For those who disagree... get over the nose-in-the-air act already. Its not bad that a GT can match the performance of a Mach 1. They are both awesome cars and 2 very different platforms.

Oh, and commenting on my "knowledge" of drag racing is , at least Im open minded and trust that an improved suspension design can net a "low" 60 foot.

-Dan
Click to expand...

I dont know if i would consider the 05GT having an improved suspension for dragracing. For hitting the corners it is better, but for drag i see alot of wheelhop problems with the stock suspension at our local tracks. With my stock mach suspension i had no wheelhop problems. I was comenting on your knowledge of drag racing because ive been bracket racing mustangs for over 8 years and over 500 passes down the 1/4 and i have yet to see a bone stock stang cut a 1.8 60ft on stock tires. My best in my bone stock mach with the stock tires was 1.983 and it took lots of practice to get that. I know alot of internet racers who claim to have run a 1.8 stock but havent seen it in person.

Timeslips from my car on the stock tires and the car was stock besides weld in magnaflow mufflers. BTW the mufflers were good for 5rwhp. It took me over 10 passes that day to get those 60fts and my clutch was a little hot at the end of the day. But i finally got my 1.9 60ft


A pic of my mach an my buddys 05GT

 

cleveland

Founding Member
Feb 19, 2002
579
0
0
SF>...
Nov 14, 2005
#48
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #48
Well, a time slip is a time slip... the internet just allows you to see what other racers are doing around the globe.

I'll be sure to see what 60 foot I can cut on my crappy tires @ Sacramento even with an automatic 5 speed before I switch over to a drag radial.

And since we are posting timeslips...



-Dan
 

RED92VERT

Founding Member
May 31, 2000
74
0
0
Nov 14, 2005
#49
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #49
what mods did you have when you ran that pass?

Also when are you planning on hitting up the track again. I might head to the track for one last time to see what i can run with my new 18s
 

cleveland

Founding Member
Feb 19, 2002
579
0
0
SF>...
Nov 14, 2005
#50
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #50
consider the rest of the car stock.

Mods for that run were: jlt short ram intake & jet throttle body spacer | diablo sport tuned spanish oak | frpp 4.10:1 gears | bmr "race" lower control arms & relocation brackets | eibach sportline lowering springs

-Dan
 
K

kerg

New Member
Aug 22, 2005
31
0
0
SF Bay Area,CA
Nov 14, 2005
#51
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #51
Hey when are you guys planning on going I'll take mine also It would be my first time but what the hay there has to be for everything
 

cleveland

Founding Member
Feb 19, 2002
579
0
0
SF>...
Nov 14, 2005
#52
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #52
I can no longer race on Wednesday Nights cause I am no longer a muffled car and Im not willing to put any more money into the exhaust cause Im happy with it the way it is. If I cant get up there for this Saturday's afternoon T'nT I'll have to wait till December.

-Dan
 
K

kerg

New Member
Aug 22, 2005
31
0
0
SF Bay Area,CA
Nov 14, 2005
#53
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #53
let me know and we can all cruise up together
 

Motorhead6T5

New Member
Oct 21, 2004
215
0
0
Marysville,CA
Nov 14, 2005
#54
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #54
cleveland said:
I can no longer race on Wednesday Nights cause I am no longer a muffled car and Im not willing to put any more money into the exhaust cause Im happy with it the way it is. If I cant get up there for this Saturday's afternoon T'nT I'll have to wait till December.

-Dan
Click to expand...
I don't have mufflers,they never said anything to me
 

Motorhead6T5

New Member
Oct 21, 2004
215
0
0
Marysville,CA
Nov 14, 2005
#55
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #55
stangpower1 said:
Thanks for the constructive criticism. I can drive very well thank you very much. I am a very good driver. I used to have a 2000 Gt, with only flowmaster exhaust and a k&n filter, and would kill camaro ss all day. I would beat camaros with my mach1 all day, I am afriad to race anyone with this 05 gt.
Click to expand...


So what you are saying is your 230rwhp car would kill 310rwhp cars all day?

Sorry but you are the stupidest person I've seen on this site yet. I am dead even with "SS Camaros" as my car sits,and your k&n + flowmaster GT would not even come close to my car,how do I know? Because I rape near stock 99-04 gt's on the street or track.

As far as the whole mach1 vs. 05+ GT,this is how I see it from my experience.
Stock for stock the mach's are a bit faster,a couple mph,and a few 10th's. Once you tune the 05,it becomes a total drivers race. The main difference between the two cars is the 05's ****ty stock tune. Once you take that out of the equation its a drivers race the whole way.Bolt on mach,is about even with a bolt on 05,but yes stock for stock the mach is a little bit faster. Who leaves their car stock anyways?
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Nov 15, 2005
#56
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #56
well i dont own either, so i stang in the middle on this one. in my experiance and the times ive seen. i think that both cars are fast off the lot. i believe the mach has the advantage stock, and on the street. add some mods and take it to the track and it is very close. to close to call modded, both are capable of blistering times if the set up is right.

stock the mach is a tad faster.
 

cleveland

Founding Member
Feb 19, 2002
579
0
0
SF>...
Nov 15, 2005
#57
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #57
BTW, if my replacement wheel shows up by Friday I will be making, what I believe is, my final appearance for the season. It will be the noon T'nT this Saturday.
 

cleveland

Founding Member
Feb 19, 2002
579
0
0
SF>...
Nov 15, 2005
#58
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #58
Motorhead6T5 said:
I don't have mufflers,they never said anything to me
Click to expand...
Im not sure I would make it to a 2nd run cause Im pretty sure my car is a whole lot louder than yours. It would fit in well with the T'nT cars though.

-Dan
 
S

stangpower1

New Member
Sep 25, 2005
20
0
0
Nov 15, 2005
#59
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #59
so you guys are saying.. If you take a mach1 and a 05 gt and do the same mods to both cars, lets say CAI, tune, exhaust, and pullies. Both would be even? How if we all have seen here on this post that stock the mach1 is faster. Wouldnt the mach1 be faster in every aspect. mach1's dont need a tune with CAI, exhaust, and pullies. and they run 12.9 all day!
 
R

RGUY3

New Member
Jan 27, 2002
3
0
0
Nov 15, 2005
#60
  • Nov 15, 2005
  • #60
2003 Mach 1 - 100% Stock with stock rubber....
My money goes on the Mach 100% stock vs. 100% stock
 

Attachments

  • timeslip2.webp
    10 KB · Views: 187
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
76
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
C
Help with headers
  • candyass
  • Jul 28, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
150
The Welcome Wagon Jul 28, 2025
AeroCoupe
9
1998 V6 - What is this line called?
  • 98_Stanger
  • Aug 10, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
268
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Aug 10, 2025
nickyb
C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
116
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
280
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?