• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

07 GT's now have less performance

  • Thread starter Thread starter BLK_2001_GT
  • Start date Start date Sep 1, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
B

BLK_2001_GT

New Member
Dec 21, 2003
4
0
0
Seattle
Sep 1, 2006
#1
  • Sep 1, 2006
  • #1
I just purchased a brand new 07 Mustang GT. I love the car very much, but in reading some of the threads in here, I was extremly disapointed to see the 3.55 ratio for the manual transmission is now only available as an option. Not nowing that, the one I purchased aparently has the new standard 3.31 ratio.
(The 3.55 option is not listed on my window sticker)

My question: How much performance am I loosing with the 3.31 vs. the 3.55's?

How much is the cost aproximetly to change the ratio to 3.55 or 3.73 with parts and labor?

Thanks for any help suggestions you can offer.
 

Sanctus

Member
May 17, 2005
146
2
19
Trabuco Canyon
Sep 1, 2006
#2
  • Sep 1, 2006
  • #2
well i have found that gears on livernoismotorsports website are pretty cheep and i would suggest getting nothing but Ford racing gears because well thats what everyone says. im looking into getting 4.10's done to my car and my ford dealer is quoting 325$ for install so thats just not happening. i am talking to a friend of a friend who is thinking more around 150$ for install but you just have to ask around.
 
J

jasonc32amg

New Member
May 25, 2004
10
0
0
Treasure Coast, FL
Sep 1, 2006
#3
  • Sep 1, 2006
  • #3
I would not worry about it...the difference between your ratio and a 3.55 is marginal. Look at the bright side, you'll feel a bigger hit when you switch up to 4.10's
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Sep 1, 2006
#4
  • Sep 1, 2006
  • #4
Modulars love to rev and 4.10s will get you there. IMO, the bump to 3.73 with a 3v or 4v engine just isn't enough.

4.10s or bust!
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Sep 1, 2006
#5
  • Sep 1, 2006
  • #5
timeless2 said:
Modulars love to rev and 4.10s will get you there. IMO, the bump to 3.73 with a 3v or 4v engine just isn't enough.

4.10s or bust!
Click to expand...


agreed.. I may go 4.30's when I get my 07 GT
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Sep 1, 2006
#6
  • Sep 1, 2006
  • #6
svttech76 said:
agreed.. I may go 4.30's when I get my 07 GT
Click to expand...
4.30s are on my list
 
S

Spdfreak

New Member
Feb 21, 2006
276
1
0
Sep 2, 2006
#7
  • Sep 2, 2006
  • #7
I'm sorry, aren't 4.10's the popular option? I mean, unless you're going to compete? Maybe I'm just a 40 year old man but my car seems fast enough as it is, right out of the box.

Sorrry, I don't need to rain on anyone's parade....

Just curious.
 
V

vitesse06

New Member
May 15, 2006
49
0
0
Sep 2, 2006
#8
  • Sep 2, 2006
  • #8
^^^^^not to rain on your parade, but your screenname isnt your name spdfreak????^^^^^^^^^ you cant have a sn like that and ask if 4:10's is too much.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Sep 2, 2006
#9
  • Sep 2, 2006
  • #9
4.30s are for the die hard car guys
 

YardSpecial

New Member
Mar 20, 2003
2,664
0
0
MT
Sep 2, 2006
#10
  • Sep 2, 2006
  • #10
3.73 are my choice with a stick car, I like frewways too much..........
With a auto 4.10 or 4.30 are a must.

Blower car, 3.55 anything lower and you blow the tires away.........
 

dubba07

New Member
Feb 27, 2006
20
0
0
Sep 2, 2006
#11
  • Sep 2, 2006
  • #11
Cavallo said:
3.73 are my choice with a stick car, I like frewways too much..........
With a auto 4.10 or 4.30 are a must.

Blower car, 3.55 anything lower and you blow the tires away.........
Click to expand...

So are you saying that a lower or higher gear ratio is better for a blown car? I put larger tires in the back which unfortunately lowered my gear ratio. I am planning on a Procharger H.O. Kit install in the very near future and wanted to know what i should be running out back as far as gearing. My ratio at the moment with these tires is 3.34
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Sep 2, 2006
#12
  • Sep 2, 2006
  • #12
numerically lower gears = "higher gears"

numerically higher gears = "lower gears"
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Sep 2, 2006
#13
  • Sep 2, 2006
  • #13
dubba07 said:
So are you saying that a lower or higher gear ratio is better for a blown car? I put larger tires in the back which unfortunately lowered my gear ratio. I am planning on a Procharger H.O. Kit install in the very near future and wanted to know what i should be running out back as far as gearing. My ratio at the moment with these tires is 3.34
Click to expand...
i would add 4.10s if i was you. that would make your ratio a little better for your set up, or change the tires.
 

forensicsteve

New Member
Aug 27, 2006
77
0
0
USA
Sep 3, 2006
#14
  • Sep 3, 2006
  • #14
I have ordered a Procharger to be fitted to a new 06 GT. The performance shop that is doing all the work told me to stay with the original gearing (5 speed manual) since I would be using the car as a daily driver. Otherwise, I would have to change gears too quickly and it would just be a general pain driving around town
 
M

Mustang Militia

New Member
Sep 9, 2006
15
0
0
Tennessee
Sep 9, 2006
#15
  • Sep 9, 2006
  • #15
get the 4.10. Got smoked last night by a otherwise stock GT. He said the 4.10 gear was the best $300 he ever spent.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 9, 2006
#16
  • Sep 9, 2006
  • #16
With the 3.55's in mine, 1st gear is almost usless in daily driving. I drive an 18 wheeler for a living and find myself takin off in the Stang in second most times. 4.10-4.30's ? No way. A month ago I took the Stang up a narrow, rocky road up to timberline in the Colorado rockies. Even on that road, I could let out on the clutch and idle along uphill in 1st. You should have seen the looks I got from the rental jeep crowd.
 

Sanctus

Member
May 17, 2005
146
2
19
Trabuco Canyon
Sep 10, 2006
#17
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #17
D.Hearne said:
With the 3.55's in mine, 1st gear is almost usless in daily driving. I drive an 18 wheeler for a living and find myself takin off in the Stang in second most times. 4.10-4.30's ? No way. A month ago I took the Stang up a narrow, rocky road up to timberline in the Colorado rockies. Even on that road, I could let out on the clutch and idle along uphill in 1st. You should have seen the looks I got from the rental jeep crowd.
Click to expand...

i dont understand,i have an 06 gt manual with a few mods and if i were to take off from a dead stop in second i would bogg for a while, i dont know if you just are used to launching at SUPER low rpms but i dont find first gear useless at all, i use it to 3500-4000k rpms and it gets me to at least 20 and then second gear catches reall nice. id bet with the 4.10's it would be drastically different but i dont necessarily agree with what your saying. Albeit you have a helluva lot more driving experiance than I so you are the authority on this subject matter, however im just not sure i share the same feelings about the stock gearing.

-Sy
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 10, 2006
#18
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #18
I don't "launch" the car in 2nd gear. In normal everyday driving I take off from a stop with it. Plus the fact that this transmission has trouble syncronizing when downshifting from 2nd to 1st, keeps me from using 1st in normal driving. The 3.55's are plenty low enough for me. I also wasn't aware that the 07's are being equiped with 3.31's I figured the LS 3.55 option now with the 07's was a response to complaints about the noisy trac-loc units at low speeds. I know mine's annoying in that regard.
 
S

speedytang

Founding Member
Jul 28, 1999
765
1
17
Marengo,Ohio,US
Sep 10, 2006
#19
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #19
I just installed 4.30s in a '06 that had 3.73s and now it drives like a good stock Fox car. LOL
The Mod just needs gears to have any feeling of torque.
 

metroplex

Member
Sep 7, 2003
405
1
16
SE MI
Oct 6, 2006
#20
  • Oct 6, 2006
  • #20
Do the 3.31s come with a factory LSD or an open differential?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
625
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
762
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
J
For Sale 2003 mustang GT
  • jimted79
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
560
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Mar 22, 2025
jimted79
J
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
861
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?