• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

10.5" Rims with 335/35/17

  • Thread starter Thread starter badstang123
  • Start date Start date Mar 12, 2006

badstang123

New Member
Jan 17, 2006
397
0
0
Santa Clarita, CA
Mar 12, 2006
#1
  • Mar 12, 2006
  • #1
I've seen a lot of people running 10.5" Cobra R's with 6.63" backspacing and a 315/35/17 tire. I assume the quad shock must be removed to do so. I figure if I'm going that far I might as well put a 335/35/17 on there. Does anyone know if this will fit? If not, what becomes the clearance issue.
 

badstang123

New Member
Jan 17, 2006
397
0
0
Santa Clarita, CA
Mar 12, 2006
#2
  • Mar 12, 2006
  • #2
I mean 17x10.5" I assumed you guys would know, but just to make sure.
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Mar 13, 2006
#3
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #3
well the 315/35/r17 clears my quadshocks, i had to modify the wheel well, though. had to hammer the inner part inwards as the tire would rub on sharp turns/bumps. i imagine w/ a 335/35/r17 that problem would be amplified, plus you'd probably have to flip the quadshocks, due to the extra width.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Mar 13, 2006
#4
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #4
Depending on what brand tire you go with, I would think 335's are just a little too wide for 10.5" rims. My goodyear 315's are 12" wide and my 10.5" rims are 11" wide from outside edge to outside edge.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Mar 13, 2006
#5
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #5
I didn't have to modify or remove anything to run my 315's.


Who makes a 335-35-17 tire, I've never seen them.
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Mar 13, 2006
#6
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #6
Ram000 said:
well the 315/35/r17 clears my quadshocks, i had to modify the wheel well, though. had to hammer the inner part inwards as the tire would rub on sharp turns/bumps. i imagine w/ a 335/35/r17 that problem would be amplified, plus you'd probably have to flip the quadshocks, due to the extra width.
Click to expand...
ditto. except for the quads. i had to flip mine to fit the wheels/tires (most likely because i am on eibach sportlines am .5".75" lower). with 335's you will definitely have rubbing issues.
 
N

Nobody

Founding Member
May 9, 2000
2,515
0
0
Kenmore, WA
Mar 13, 2006
#7
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #7
Killercanary said:
I didn't have to modify or remove anything to run my 315's.


Who makes a 335-35-17 tire, I've never seen them.
Click to expand...

Michelin and Pirelli make 335 tires for the Viper and Saleen, respectively. For the sake of rationale though, The viper wheel is 17x13, not 10.5". Low 5.0 has a good point.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Mar 13, 2006
#8
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #8
I run a 17x11 TTII rim with 315's I had to flip my quad shock but I think that is from the wider rim.

I think a 315 is as wide as you would want to go on a 10.5 rim.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Mar 13, 2006
#9
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #9
Nobody said:
Michelin and Pirelli make 335 tires for the Viper and Saleen, respectively. For the sake of rationale though, The viper wheel is 17x13, not 10.5". Low 5.0 has a good point.
Click to expand...


I thought they were 18" though and not 17", are they 17"?
 
N

Nobody

Founding Member
May 9, 2000
2,515
0
0
Kenmore, WA
Mar 13, 2006
#10
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #10
Killercanary said:
I thought they were 18" though and not 17", are they 17"?
Click to expand...

Sorry, the '98 Viper had 17" wheels. That was the first year I ever saw a 335 on a street car. The newer ones do have 18's, albeit, 335's still.
 

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
Glenview,Il
Mar 13, 2006
#11
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #11
Too wide a tire for that rim. Actually a 315 is as wide as you wanna go on on a 10.5 wide rim. Beyond that its not too safe. So I wouldent even think about it ...clerance issues aside.
 

Car Nut

Founding Member
Jul 6, 2000
1,176
1
37
Snellville, Georgia (Atlanta area)
Mar 13, 2006
#12
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #12
315's look pretty darn wide across the back of a stang. Can't imagine anything wider. Anyone got pics of something wider?

Considering the extra "footprint" with 315 tires (or wider), are there concerns about wearing out the axles, drivetrain, or other parts quicker than normal? I've heard a couple people suggest elsewhere that all the extra traction can actually put a lot of strain on the car, if you get on it fairly regularly.

I've considered 315 tires with the MM torque arm, panhard bar, and other rear stuff which eliminates the need for upper control arms and quad shocks. Only rubbing issue might be the wheel well lip, from what I gather so far in this post. I've got to call MM sometime and find out if having such a wide tire would ruin the performance of my eventual suspension setup.

Back to my first statement, 335 tires do seem like they'd be too wide on a stang.
 
9

95mustang_gt

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
364
1
0
Wisconsin
Mar 13, 2006
#13
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #13
should i have not problems running 285 40 18 on the back of my car?it does have stock suspension.
 

badstang123

New Member
Jan 17, 2006
397
0
0
Santa Clarita, CA
Mar 13, 2006
#14
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #14
Michelin, Pirelli, Hoosier,Dunlop, and Kumho all make that size tire. You guys have me convinced that I shouldn't do it though . I just thought it would look Bad ***. They do recommend at least a 11" rim for that size tire though. Thanks for the input guys.
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Mar 13, 2006
#15
  • Mar 13, 2006
  • #15
Car Nut said:
I've heard a couple people suggest elsewhere that all the extra traction can actually put a lot of strain on the car, if you get on it fairly regularly.
Click to expand...


Traction comes primarily from the sidewall of the tire ... and your suspension components. Width of the tire is not as big of a factor as those 2 things. So running a 315/35 doesn't give you "that much" more traction .... that it would screw stuff up. The sidewall is not very thick. I can tell a good increase in traction with mine ... but it ain't close to running slicks or anything.


In other words .... you're right (and they're right) ..... but just by running a 315/35 doesn't mean your traction will increase to that level.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
395
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
P
Fox 17" Deep Dish Bullitts on Rear of Fox, 275/40/17?
  • pindude80
  • May 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
736
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 4, 2025
Noobz347
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
184
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
509
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Starters suck. So does the aftermarket!
  • Blue Thunder
  • Apr 30, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
4K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 13, 2024
Blue Thunder
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?