• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

10 best v-8 engines period the mighty 5.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter revedup
  • Start date Start date Jul 10, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
46
Northern KY
Jul 12, 2007
#81
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #81
Well my last thoughts on the Camaros....i've NEVER seen a stock Camaro from the '80s run anything faster than 15 seconds...and i've seen plenty of stock Fox's dip into the 13.90s. Now of course, i haven't seen it all, but that's my experience.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Jul 12, 2007
#82
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #82
somebody please post up the camaro radio link!!!!!!!!!1
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
46
Northern KY
Jul 12, 2007
#83
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #83
Man i used to have the whole clip but i lost it on a hdd crash
 

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Jul 12, 2007
#84
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #84
fiveohwblow said:
1.8kmint said:
I am glad you boys are starting to chime in. I am laughing at the thought of the 305's being even remotely fast. I have even raced em in my v-6 with bold ons and won! I have driven and ridden in about 4 and can also safely say compared to the 4 5.0's I have owned and the 10 I have driven never has a stock 305 even come close to beating a stock 5.0. Well I guess if you want to go specs in 1988 the 305 had a whopping 170 hp oh that would be why it beats the 225 in the GT Must be the torque then... well, darn it all it only had 255 in contrast to the 300 in the GT. If you wanted to pull the weight card the iroc z weighed 3228. Not lighter than the 5.0 either, but over all I can see how you would think it was faster...

Edit: 305 FTMFL
Click to expand...

Wrong try 215 hp and 295 torque 305 1987 to 1992 in their 305!!!!!
Click to expand...
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Jul 12, 2007
#85
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #85
here it is www.squizzle.com/soundview.asp?id=118
 
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
Jul 12, 2007
#86
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #86
OMG thanks :lmao:
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 12, 2007
#87
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #87
revedup said:
Wrong try 215 hp and 295 torque 305 1987 to 1992 in their 305!!!!!
Click to expand...

Some things just look better on paper. In real world comparisons, the 305 HO's were circling the bowl.
 
R

RS200

Member
Sep 23, 2004
95
0
16
38
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Jul 12, 2007
#88
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #88
The non-HO 305 sucked with its 170hp..the roller-cam version (L69) had a lot more power...night and day difference. I've seen an '84 L69 Z/28 with an automatic and 4.11s go..it was actually very quick. Had 13.99 potential.

One of my all-time favorite engines is the K-Code 289. Redline @ 8000, 271hp @ 6000, and some torque. We have two '65 K-fastbacks HP and torque aren't the only measurements of engines. Ford put the 3000 mile warranty on these cars for a reason.

Sure the SBF is a great motor, but with its 45 year background, it should be a lot more evolved than it is.
 
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
Jul 12, 2007
#89
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #89
I agree... the little 289 was a pretty good engine...

I guess Ford didn't want to retool the 5.0L engine and put more efforts in the 4.6 which, from a marketing standpoint, sounds better saying DOHC 4.6 than just 5.0L... IT worked because we still have Mustangs, and the Chevy folks lost their cambirds for a while.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Jul 12, 2007
#90
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #90
revedup said:
fiveohwblow said:
Wrong try 215 hp and 295 torque 305 1987 to 1992 in their 305!!!!!
Click to expand...

Hmmmm, http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/spec_engines.aspx?year=1988&make=Chevrolet&model=Camaro&trimid=-1
Click to expand...
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
38
Connecticut
Jul 12, 2007
#91
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #91
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Well my last thoughts on the Camaros....i've NEVER seen a stock Camaro from the '80s run anything faster than 15 seconds...and i've seen plenty of stock Fox's dip into the 13.90s. Now of course, i haven't seen it all, but that's my experience.
Click to expand...

A fox with gears and a few bolt ons will dip into the 13.90s, but not bone stock. Bone stock will be a high 14 second, maybe 15.0 car with the average driver. A 305 H.O. is listed to run 15.0 bone stock, and we all know a car can run a little better than the magazines make it run. My buddy had an '87 Formula with a 350 and an auto. With simple bolt ons and a converter it ran 13.3 on slicks. His brother's 305 H.O. had a stock exhaust with the cat removed, and he said the intake was port matched because they were rediculous from the factory. The 305 ran right with the low 13 second formula on the street, he said within a car.
 

88mouse

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
630
0
0
Mooresville nc
Jul 12, 2007
#92
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #92
blackened88lx said:
Oh god haha. Crossfire injection is a joke.



My brother works in Nascar so believe me, I have all the info. The last time Nascar did a dyno session with the top teams it was north of 800-850hp, and the Busch cars aren't too far behind. They're probably 700+. All of your theory on pushrods vs OHC sounds great, but the cup cars spin to 9500 rpm on a regular basis, and I've seen them closer to 10k. There are also a few drag classes with small blocks spinning to 10k. Show me some mod motors putitng out that rpm.
Click to expand...

I live in mooresville where like 90% of the nascar teams are and i have seen an ernie elliott motor (a dodge motor) puting out 930hp.
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
38
Connecticut
Jul 12, 2007
#93
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #93
88mouse said:
I live in mooresville where like 90% of the nascar teams are and i have seen an ernie elliott motor (a dodge motor) puting out 930hp.
Click to expand...

That's cool, my brother lives in Davidson, not far from you.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
173
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
646
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread "Alter Ego" White 1993 LX 5.0 5spd
  • idareu
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2025
idareu
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Engine Engine rebuild suggestions
  • JulianR
  • Mar 3, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 20 21 22
Replies
434
Views
41K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 26, 2024
JulianR
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?