Assuming you are talking about the Lobe Seperation Angle (LSA) the 114 will have more vacuum at idle and will be more streetable on a stock EEC for the 94-95 Mustang. As to which is better it all depends on your plans for your car and what cam will work with the rest of your combination of engine parts.
My E-cam has a LSA of 110*. Stock cam is 118.5*. 114* and 112* will give you no problems on the street. I got lucky and my car responded quite well to the 110LSA of the E-cam. I only get a little idle stutter when the car is cold at startup but i'm still untuned. Don't be affraid to run lower LSA.
My E-cam has a LSA of 110*. Stock cam is 118.5*. 114* and 112* will give you no problems on the street. I got lucky and my car responded quite well to the 110LSA of the E-cam. I only get a little idle stutter when the car is cold at startup but i'm still untuned. Don't be affraid to run lower LSA.
112° is generally a better number than 114° too keep your power curve alittle higher. But there are too many variables involved to say which will be better for you. It all comes down to overlap and cylinder pressures. More overlap will tend to shift your power band higher. Too much kills your torque everywhere and too little kills your top end but gives you a ton down low. So you have to balance your LSA/Lift/Duration to get the best results.