• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

14.7 @ 95 Good/bad?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StarFox07
  • Start date Start date Jun 16, 2007
S

StarFox07

New Member
Jun 10, 2005
71
0
0
Texas
Jun 16, 2007
#1
  • Jun 16, 2007
  • #1
I ran my car at the track last week and only got one run in due to lightning. I got a average launch (bogged slightly) shifted a little early out of 1st and 2nd and ran a 14.7 at 95. My car has a cai (kind of not great) gears (PO said 3.73's, but i'm not for sure, feels steeper maybe 4.10's) and subframes. I passed through the trap halfway though 4th gear. I know i'm not the best driver, but is this a reasonably good time for a basically stock 5.0? Seems like the trap speed is a little low. Its a coupe 5 speed. I'm putting a cam in it monday, hopefully i can get near 100mph in the 1/4.


EDIT: The car had been running for a good 20 minutes straight, so it wasnt cool and the check engine light was on, if that would have anything to do with it.
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Jun 16, 2007
#2
  • Jun 16, 2007
  • #2
What kind of tires? What was your 60?
 
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
Jun 16, 2007
#3
  • Jun 16, 2007
  • #3
Here's what I ran w/ the stock LX 5.0 in my sig:

 

grey5.0beast

Cookies should never be DUNKED!!!
Aug 3, 2004
0
1
0
atl ga
Jun 16, 2007
#4
  • Jun 16, 2007
  • #4
That's not bad, I have alot more mods and I am running 14.6@96.4mph w/ a 2.25 60ft. I am getting some tires then shooting for 13s if I candrive(not likely )

Good job for a first timer!!
 
S

StarFox07

New Member
Jun 10, 2005
71
0
0
Texas
Jun 16, 2007
#5
  • Jun 16, 2007
  • #5
The tires are actually very bad. My '60 was 2.2 but i think i can do a little better.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jun 16, 2007
#6
  • Jun 16, 2007
  • #6
I went out to the track today and didn't fair too well either....it was 92* and humid as all hell. Nobody was hooking for crap and i don't think anyone on street tires broke out of the 2.0 60' range. I didn't even back up my best time
 

BigHairyMonkey

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2003
411
1
16
Houston (Bellaire) TX
Jun 16, 2007
#7
  • Jun 16, 2007
  • #7
bring your 60ft down and i think you will see LOW 14s. I only have a MAF and exhaust over your mods and i think w/ a t-lok rebuild and some dr's ill see 13.50-60s. i went 13.94 @ 99 w/ a 2.01 60ft on street radials (245 roadhugger GTAs)
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Jun 16, 2007
#8
  • Jun 16, 2007
  • #8
A cam is not gonna do as much as a set of heads would. The stock cam is pretty good. The stock intake and heads are a huge bottle neck. Replace those 2 items and she's gonna breathe a 1000X better! Lose the stock H pipe if your gonna do the intake and heads, it will compliment the mods!
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Jun 16, 2007
#9
  • Jun 16, 2007
  • #9
sounds like a good time for the mods listed get the 2.2 60' down to a nice 2.0 with street tires, try to get a nice drag radial or slick and bust 1.8 and you should see much better results.
 
L

lang williams

New Member
Jun 11, 2003
567
0
0
cleveland, oh
Jun 17, 2007
#10
  • Jun 17, 2007
  • #10
My 87 aod car ran 14.6's with 2.6 60' times, but with 373's, 1.7 rr's, and an edelbrock perfromer intake/65 mm tb.
 
J

jballa

Member
May 17, 2007
32
0
6
Jun 17, 2007
#11
  • Jun 17, 2007
  • #11
I have 92 t5 coupe that ran about .2 faster in the 1/8 and 1/4 when stock. I think its pretty darn good though for what u got going.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Jun 18, 2007
#12
  • Jun 18, 2007
  • #12
Thats actually a good time and decent MPH for the few mods you have. The check engine light would worry me a little bit. Pull the codes and see whats its all about. Then ice down the intake before you run it next time and see what you can come up with. Practice the launch and your shifting and you should see some LOW 14's. Not back for a basically stock notch. I also agree a cam is a bad idea at this time. No real performance gains to be had. You will most likely loose low end grunt and only pick up a couple ponies between 3k and 4.5k. An intake and O/R h pipe would be money better spent. good times though!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
312
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
879
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
796
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
407
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
A
Car is running bad
  • Anthony3511
  • Apr 30, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
375
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2025
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?