gruvee87vertgt
20+ Year Stangneter 

tunedin302 said:That looks good. Any closer/bigger pics?
thats the first time I ever posted a pic...so I guess I should be happy.....I am going to try to transfer pics from cardomain to stangnet.

tunedin302 said:That looks good. Any closer/bigger pics?


mansonozz said:I'm considering rice thenWhen done right, they look poifect!
gruvee87vertgt said:18' are hot and your stang and it will handle nice.
I dont beleive the ultra lites will look as they are too flat...Deep rims look hot on stangs. Also you will need to remove your quad shock to install them in the back.

GSP393 said:I've yet to be inlightened.![]()

8950HO said:Maximum Motorsports told me that 18" wheels on a fox are mainly for bling,not performance.

GSP393 said:Maybe the weight reduction is where the performance comes from, you know with the thinner tire and less air and all.![]()
tunedin302 said:Are you still here? :Zip2:
Please be aware that while 18s' offer a great "bling" factor IMO, they also offer the oppurtunity to run a large caliper/rotor setup on the front and rear. This does help with a decrease in the stopping distance.
Secondly, removing the quad shock is completely acceptable if the car runs a decent lower control arm. The quad is strictly there to reduce wheel hop, whereas an aftermarket LCA will effectuate the same. Of course, the need to remove the quad shock also depends on the wheel width and offset. In my case I did not need to remove it to fit the wheel but instead decided to pull it once I put on some decent LCAs.
Thirdly, I seriously debated running a 17" FMS wheel but ended up going with the 18", why? because Saleen only makes the 99-04 wheels in 18". That is the size that looks authentic and I refuse to get a cheap copy version in 17".
Also, I would hope you know this, however, most 18s are heavier than 17s. While this may not be the case with the MM Maxxim 18" wheels, I know it is with my Saleens. I also decided to compensate for this weight by getting 2 piece rotors at all four corners which is a reduction of 5lbs per rotor.
We all know you don't like 18s but there are plenty of us that still do. Hopefully you feel a little more "inlightened" now.

GSP393 said:13" rotors front and back will fit under 17"s.

GSP393 said:I really don't care if either way, it's not my car or my money.![]()

I am happy and I say "function over fashion" For the same cash you could make alot of hp. Let's agree to disagree or not, I'm just getting bored with this thread.tunedin302 said:But not 14" rotors .......
I know, that's why I didn't say 14"s
Be happy about that cause bling aint cheap![]()

GSP393 said:For the same cash you could make alot of hp.
GSP393 said:I'm just getting bored with this thread. :dead.

GSP393 said:yep I do, I think it's fun to see what kind of clever reply you'll come back with.
tunedin302 said:C'mon man, time to grow up a bit. Your posts have absolutely nothing positive to contribute to the original posters question.