• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

1965-200-6=120, 1981-200-6=94, WHY???

  • Thread starter Thread starter olbob
  • Start date Start date Jul 10, 2011
O

olbob

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2002
140
0
17
Maine
Jul 10, 2011
#1
  • Jul 10, 2011
  • #1
What can I do to an 1981 200(3.3) engine to get it up to a 1965 120 HP,
Why the difference???They should be approximately the same engine.If not
why not?????
olbob
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Jul 10, 2011
#2
  • Jul 10, 2011
  • #2
Probably compression ratio.

You could mill the head and put a more agressive cam in it, But I wouldn't waste time or money on it. Back in '89 a buddy of mine did that to his I-6 Granada. Milled head, Lunati cam, header, bigger intake manifold with a holley carb. It was still a turd, probably didn't make 140 hp. For what he spent he could have built a nice little 302 and been done, but he wanted to be different.
 

ID89GT

10 Year Member
May 26, 2008
1,659
18
49
Spokane Valley, WA
Jul 10, 2011
#3
  • Jul 10, 2011
  • #3
Emissions might be a small part of it
 
J

JEEPSTANG59

New Member
Jul 3, 2011
10
0
0
Jul 10, 2011
#4
  • Jul 10, 2011
  • #4
The easiest answer is that in 69 or 70 auto manufactures changed from brake hp to net hp. Flywheel to rear wheel if I am not mistaken.

Paul
 

cjrpony

Member
Jan 23, 2010
439
0
17
West Michigan
Jul 11, 2011
#5
  • Jul 11, 2011
  • #5
SSeater said:
Probably compression ratio.
Click to expand...

ID89GT said:
Emissions might be a small part of it
Click to expand...

JEEPSTANG59 said:
The easiest answer is that in 69 or 70 auto manufactures changed from brake hp to net hp. Flywheel to rear wheel if I am not mistaken.

Paul
Click to expand...

All of the above. My first car was a 74 Maverick with 250ci 6cyl and it made a whopping 91 horse compared to 155 in 1970!
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jul 11, 2011
#6
  • Jul 11, 2011
  • #6
a turbo will wake it up
 
9

98gtvert

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2002
140
4
18
south carolina
Jul 11, 2011
#7
  • Jul 11, 2011
  • #7
Im sure that there isnt much if any difference in the performance of the 2 engines. If im not mistaken until the early 70's auto manufacturers determined the output by testing the engines pretty much bare to the point of having no drag. open headers carb etc. Then the rating methods were changed to truely represent the power that the engine made. betcha the engines would dyno the same. Why spend ur money on that engine? A decent used 302 can be found cheap and I think you would be a heck of a lot happier with the performance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
296
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
676
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
M
Too much for me to repair in my current housing situation
  • My Drama Magnet 04 Gt
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
8
Views
297
The Welcome Wagon Apr 14, 2026
Noobz347
B
Subframe connector question
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
973
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 5, 2026
rednotch
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?