• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

1969 351w Intake Manifold Selection

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr67Stang
  • Start date Start date Jul 30, 2012

Mr67Stang

Active Member
Feb 10, 2007
117
7
28
Fayetteville, NC
Jul 30, 2012
#1
  • Jul 30, 2012
  • #1
Hello. I need a little help. I have a 1969 351w with an Edelbrock Performer RPM I bought from Summit 12 years ago. I just set up some new heads and want to upgrade to a Victor Jr. and a .500+ lift cam. I see all manifolds for the 351w are listed for the 9.5 in deck hight windsor. I think mine is less than that. I want proper port alignment and seal. Can I use a thicker head gasket to make up the difference. Is it even something to worry about? Any direct experience with this? I apreciate any help you can give.
 

BuckeyeDemon

Member
Apr 13, 2010
130
9
19
Cincinnati, OH
Jul 30, 2012
#2
  • Jul 30, 2012
  • #2
i have the shorter deck windsor like you (and the block was decked). I'm using a victor jr. Regardless to what block you have, you would want to check the port alignment. Everyone's setup will be slightly different given the number of different heads, blocks, machine work, etc. They do make thicker gaskets if it's really needed.
 

Mr67Stang

Active Member
Feb 10, 2007
117
7
28
Fayetteville, NC
Jul 30, 2012
#3
  • Jul 30, 2012
  • #3
Apreciate the reply. I figured I might have a 9.5 DH intake on it already but could not be sure. It's been about 16-17 years since I bought any "go-fast" parts for my car. It's time to shake of that rust and dust and nothing does it better than a bigger cam
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jul 30, 2012
#4
  • Jul 30, 2012
  • #4
there really isnt much difference between your 351w deck height, and the 74 and later deck height. yours is 9.48" the later one is 9.5", and near the end 351ws went to 9.503". in the end .02" isnt going to cause any real problems.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Jul 31, 2012
#5
  • Jul 31, 2012
  • #5
rbohm nailed it.
 

Mr67Stang

Active Member
Feb 10, 2007
117
7
28
Fayetteville, NC
Aug 1, 2012
#6
  • Aug 1, 2012
  • #6
Apreciate the help. I have to do a little confidence building to get back into the swing of things. Check the attached. This is what I am thinking I might get for my set up. I already have a good block with factory rotating assembly, Kieth Black Hyp flat tops and World Windsor Sr. 2.02/1.60 cast iron heads (new springs installed), Holly 750 w/vac seconds.
 

Attachments

  • wish list.webp
    152.7 KB · Views: 224
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
516
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
817
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
H
SOLD Trick Flow 351w R series EFI manifold upper and lower NEW In BOX NEVER installed
  • Hizdudeness
  • Mar 6, 2024
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
2
Views
3K
Engine and Power Adder Mar 6, 2024
Hizdudeness
H
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?