Guess I'm gonna have to requote this since you went back and edited it.
Why would you assume that I want to hammer on your team?
Here is the facts for the fact challenged..
1. the patriots won today with a qb who has not started a regular season game since HS..
True, but lets keep in mind he backed up TWO Heisman trophy winners at USC.
Another idiotic assumption with no facts to back it up.
If you had even the slightest bit of reading comprehension skills you'd see I never disagreed with that.
Yeah, and I don't know football.

Let me guess, you never played the game right? Well in that case let me remind you that a fumble by the WR would happen AFTER the catch was made and would not effect Brady's numbers at all outside of shortening the drive.
You do realize both of bradys drives ended in fumbles right? so how was that his fault.. he left the game with 7 minutes left in the first quarter. The guy did not play a snap since feb sure he was a little rusty but there is nothing he could do about fumbles.
who cares if it did not effect his stats I am aware that the yards and completion count thats only stats it does not matter.. what matters is the pats lost scoring chances since it ended the drives, do you think belichick or any of the patriots players gave a crap if they counted on the stat sheet..
I just don't understand what you expected brady to do in two series where his WR's fumbled.. He did not have a chance to do anything in that game before he went out.
I also don't understand if you saw the game how you could think that cassel was not a drop off.. he missed a few open guys threw two near INT's that should have been picked. He was ok in general and had one excellent pass when the cheifs sold out on the run when the pats were on their own 1 yard line. thats not the same as having tom brady in the game. anybody who watched that game could see the drop off
BTW I played probably the same amount of football as you did I played HS football not that it matters since playing HS football does not make you or me a expert. Even if you played for some small college that does not matter either, unless you can make a NFL roster I don't care how high of a level you played.
my problem with your posts are
1. you posted that they did not play well against a bad team...
Well DUHHHHHH they had a HUGE drop off at QB.. they went from a all time great to a guy that could not even start a college game.
2. you compared loosing croyle to brady...
when I pointed out the pats lost brady you responded with telling us that the cheifs lost croyle in the third quarter.. HOW is that even close to loosing brady in the first 10 minutes of the game. the cheifs back up huard has more NFL experience and is probably a better qb at this point than croyle. Not even close to the impact of loosing brady.
3. You said brady was not playing well when he went out..
HE PLAYED TWO SERIES.. Both of them ended in fumbles what the hell was he supposed to do about it.. ok he was a little rusty the first time out are you surprised about that? do you honestly think that would have continued all game. It's not like he threw 2 picks to start the game.
Look just PM me if you want to argue. your only points at this stage of this argument is my grammar and how much football I played, neither of them matter...