• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Progress Thread 2001 Gt Engine Swap To 2010 Crown Vic 4.6

  • Thread starter Thread starter Floyd the bear
  • Start date Start date Oct 24, 2016
F

Floyd the bear

New Member
Oct 23, 2016
9
0
1
Oct 24, 2016
#1
  • Oct 24, 2016
  • #1
I am new to the late model mustang world and taking this journey for my grandchildren.

The original 4.6 engine measured the coolant temperature at the intake and the factory new 2010 crown vic looks like it measures it under the intake.

My question is which is better? I like the idea of measuring the temperature at the block.
 

wmburns

SN Certified Technician
Aug 14, 2009
5,892
514
204
Houston Texas
Oct 25, 2016
#2
  • Oct 25, 2016
  • #2
For the record the Crown Vic PCM monitors temperature at BOTH the coolant (ECT) and the cylinder head temperature (CHT). The PCM uses this data to better protect the motor from over heating.

Consider that the CHT does lag compared to the ECT. Which is why the Crown Vic monitors both.

The ECT does have the problem that it will read low IF the coolant level is low. Whereas the CHT will read correct.

BUT the Mustang PCM in the 4.6 doesn't have support for a cylinder head temperature sensor (CHT) so does it matter which is "better"?

Don't expect good results if you were to hook the ECT wire to the CHT.

Most people doing this swap either remove the CHT or just leave it unconnected.
 
F

Floyd the bear

New Member
Oct 23, 2016
9
0
1
Oct 25, 2016
#3
  • Oct 25, 2016
  • #3
Thanks for the answer, I will have to drill and tap the intake manifold for the mustang temp probe.
 

wmburns

SN Certified Technician
Aug 14, 2009
5,892
514
204
Houston Texas
Oct 31, 2016
#4
  • Oct 31, 2016
  • #4
Floyd the bear said:
Thanks for the answer, I will have to drill and tap the intake manifold for the mustang temp probe.
Click to expand...
I'm trying understand WHY this is necessary as the Crown Vic's intake coolant cross over also comes with an ECT. I'm sure of this because the motor currently in my 2000 GT came from a 2003 Grand Marquis.
 
F

Floyd the bear

New Member
Oct 23, 2016
9
0
1
Oct 31, 2016
#5
  • Oct 31, 2016
  • #5
That's the reason why I asked the question, the intake has the boss area for the pipe thread but is not drilled or tapped. My thinking was they moved it to the cylinder head on the 2010.
I have attached a photo of the manifold.
 
F

Floyd the bear

New Member
Oct 23, 2016
9
0
1
Oct 31, 2016
#6
  • Oct 31, 2016
  • #6
Using this forum for information we have pulled the engine and transmission. Over the next few days we will swap the wiring harness, fuel injectors, flywheel and clutch.
Ran across one issue the egr tubing was cracked, in the past I would have plugged it and did an egr delete but reading an article in Stangnet showed me the benefits a good working egr.
 
F

Floyd the bear

New Member
Oct 23, 2016
9
0
1
Nov 7, 2016
#7
  • Nov 7, 2016
  • #7
Drilled and tapped the intake manifold and started to add the fuel injector but they look terrible. They are EV 1 19-lb stock injectors, the new engine injectors are EV-6 but look to be 40-lb injectors (I guess because of it being a flex fuel engine). This ruined my plans to use them.
 

wmburns

SN Certified Technician
Aug 14, 2009
5,892
514
204
Houston Texas
Nov 7, 2016
#8
  • Nov 7, 2016
  • #8
To get the best PCM compatibility the original Stock Mustang injectors should be used. Anything else will need a tune.

IF the Mustang injectors are suspect, then consider an injector cleaning and flow test service such as injectorRX.com. Once cleaned and tested they are as good as new. Cheaper than new.
 
F

Floyd the bear

New Member
Oct 23, 2016
9
0
1
Nov 8, 2016
#9
  • Nov 8, 2016
  • #9
Thanks, because I am wanting to assemble the engine/transmission and stick it in the car I am going to buy new o-rings and install the injectors after cleaning them. At the same time I am ordering a set of stock rebuilt and balanced injectors.
Any suggestions on the best and most economical place to purchase the A?
 
F

Floyd the bear

New Member
Oct 23, 2016
9
0
1
Nov 8, 2016
#10
  • Nov 8, 2016
  • #10
As an older mechanic I am really impressed with ford and the way they designed the engine assembly. With all of the electronics and fuel injection I found it a pleasure to add the wiring harness and assemble all the components preparing for installation. All just plug and play.
 
F

Floyd the bear

New Member
Oct 23, 2016
9
0
1
Dec 4, 2016
#11
  • Dec 4, 2016
  • #11
The engine was installed and started up after I installed a stock 89 octane tune. The new engine runs smoothly but because of the rain the car is still up on jack stands.

The SCT tuner that came with the car has no name associated with the 3 tunes
89 stock
91 stock
91 race
Wish I could tell who did the tune so I could look for updates.
 
F

Floyd the bear

New Member
Oct 23, 2016
9
0
1
Dec 23, 2016
#12
  • Dec 23, 2016
  • #12
The new engine runs great went ahead and installed the new 24lb injectors and update the tune to match.

I started tearing the old engine to see what happen and what I found was new to me. The front 2 rod bearings were welded to the crank (really soldered) the rest of the rods and mains were good. Everything looks fresh and it appears some mistake was made or the oil passage was plugged.

Next a set of gears.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
2001 roush stage 3 - sat for 5 years
  • Brando_05
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
260
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
Brando_05
B
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
295
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
M
2001 evap/heater core questions
  • mnky99
  • Sep 3, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
318
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Sep 3, 2025
mnky99
M
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
903
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
733
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?