• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

2005 Mustang V6 - Room for adding more horsepower?

  • Thread starter Thread starter storm_sentinel
  • Start date Start date Oct 1, 2004
S

storm_sentinel

New Member
Sep 30, 2004
2
0
0
Oct 1, 2004
#1
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #1
I was wondering if the '05 V6 Mustang could be easily modded for some extra horsepower. What are some good ways (nothing too expensive) to go about doing this? I think it would be nice to achieve 250 bhp or somewhere around there if possible.

Thanks
 

i4power

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
1,083
0
0
Eglin AFB, Florida
Oct 1, 2004
#2
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #2
Definitely. From what I understand, it's basically the same V6 that is in the Explorer. Don't they have superchargers for those?

Besides, they come stock with 210hp. That's about what the V8's were putting out in 94-97.
 
S

storm_sentinel

New Member
Sep 30, 2004
2
0
0
Oct 1, 2004
#3
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #3
Thanks. I found a link on mustangmonthly.com to a couple of products that claim can add up to 35 bhp to basically any car and also increase the fuel efficiency. They cost about $70. I don't know if anyone has ever tried those and if they live up to the claim, but maybe thats an inexpensive option.

Off topic, do you know of any websites that basically list what kind of engines/horsepower a lot of the older muscle cars to current day had/have? I would like to compare the V6 Mustang's 210 bhp engine to some of those cars and see where it stands.
 

Ghostalker

Member
Jul 5, 2003
184
0
16
Danbury, CT
Oct 1, 2004
#4
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #4
hrmm... if it was that cheap... and that much power...
"if it sounds to good to be true... you... you cant fool me again "(im kidding i hate kerry more than bush)
why n0t try t3h ternad0r whr1z0r!?
 

GREENBIOCH

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2002
1,241
0
0
In an Igloo
Oct 2, 2004
#5
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #5
Ghostalker said:
hrmm... if it was that cheap... and that much power...
"if it sounds to good to be true... you... you cant fool me again "(im kidding i hate kerry more than bush)
why n0t try t3h ternad0r whr1z0r!?
Click to expand...

Dude that thing is hella-cool!
 

i4power

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
1,083
0
0
Eglin AFB, Florida
Oct 2, 2004
#6
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #6
storm_sentinel said:
Thanks. I found a link on mustangmonthly.com to a couple of products that claim can add up to 35 bhp to basically any car and also increase the fuel efficiency. They cost about $70. I don't know if anyone has ever tried those and if they live up to the claim, but maybe thats an inexpensive option.

Off topic, do you know of any websites that basically list what kind of engines/horsepower a lot of the older muscle cars to current day had/have? I would like to compare the V6 Mustang's 210 bhp engine to some of those cars and see where it stands.
Click to expand...

Don't by the "tornado" or the "spiralmax". They are a total scam. Don't buy ANYTHING that claims to add 35hp for $70. You should expect to pay $500+ to get half that.

In terms of power output, the V6 is limp-dick compared to the muscle cars of old. Even then, it's still no slouch. Motorweeks' test found that the V6 does 0-60 in 7.0 seconds.
 

Ghostalker

Member
Jul 5, 2003
184
0
16
Danbury, CT
Oct 2, 2004
#7
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #7
"The 5-speed manual gearbox is firm and positive, while the automatic is crisp and refined. But to the numbers. V-8 0-60 in 5.0 seconds flat. The V-6 is no slouch either at 7.0 seconds. And the chassis is just as impressive, with a tight, solid feel that makes the old Mustang feel like rubber."
-Motorweek

7.0 sounds good.. lol, but the GT at 5? hrm, dayum thats quick..
 

marvinmycat

Founding Member
Feb 13, 2002
1,179
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Oct 2, 2004
#8
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #8
Read the article on SN's Homepage "2005 Steeda Q400." I'm sure they'll be getting around to the V6 in no time.
 
C

cobra232

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
233
0
0
Oct 4, 2004
#9
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #9
the 4.0 while a great factory engine doesn't have the potential that the essex 3.8 family has.

it is not as strong and does not have the breathing capabilities as the 3.8

250 and even 300 BHP is possible and probably alittle more with the 4.0, but it will never come close to the 3.8 for potential.

that is a fact not opinion
 

Penguin

Active Member
Oct 23, 2003
115
1
28
SC
Oct 18, 2004
#10
  • Oct 18, 2004
  • #10
Why is that fact and not opinion?

It's a new format. It's common knowledge that it's easier to get power out of older engines.

So... what are the facts? Why would Ford go with a less efficient, weaker engine with less breathing ability? Makes sense...

What are the strengths of each engine, and what are their respective breathing capabilities, for us that don't know?
 
9

98V6

New Member
Oct 28, 2004
43
0
0
Baltimore, MD
Oct 29, 2004
#11
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #11
i4power said:
Definitely. From what I understand, it's basically the same V6 that is in the Explorer. Don't they have superchargers for those?
Click to expand...

Well yes and no. There are 2 companies with them in the works. It is the same enigne as the Range also. The same one in my Ranger. There are a few people on a ranger forum that have custom superchargers on theirs.
www.generation-edge.com
 
9

98V6

New Member
Oct 28, 2004
43
0
0
Baltimore, MD
Oct 29, 2004
#12
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #12
storm_sentinel said:
Thanks. I found a link on mustangmonthly.com to a couple of products that claim can add up to 35 bhp to basically any car and also increase the fuel efficiency. They cost about $70. I don't know if anyone has ever tried those and if they live up to the claim, but maybe thats an inexpensive option.
Click to expand...

What is it called ? Do you have a link ? I am thinking its too good to be true but you never know.
 
9

98V6

New Member
Oct 28, 2004
43
0
0
Baltimore, MD
Oct 29, 2004
#13
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #13
cobra232 said:
the 4.0 while a great factory engine doesn't have the potential that the essex 3.8 family has.

it is not as strong and does not have the breathing capabilities as the 3.8

250 and even 300 BHP is possible and probably alittle more with the 4.0, but it will never come close to the 3.8 for potential.

that is a fact not opinion
Click to expand...

Push Rods are the way of the past Over head Cams are where its at today. Like Penguin said why would ford go backwards with a less efficient engine that can't breath as good. I heard the same thing in 1996 when ford stopped the 5.0 and went with the 4.6. Over head cams have less moving parts between the crank and valves. Less moving parts equals better durabilty, better efficiency, and better RPM range. The 3.8 is a great engine but it had its time and the 4.0 SOHC has its time now and in a year to 2 when the aftermarket starts coming out with some cool stuff the 4.0 will really shine.
 

'03 6-Speed

New Member
May 23, 2003
216
0
0
Panhandle O' Texas
Oct 29, 2004
#14
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #14
When I see five 2005 V6's run 11s in the quarter, like 04 and previous 3.8s, then I'll know there's a better aftermarket available for it. Oh, I got those stats from www.v6power.net
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
Car has been overheating. Not sure what is causing it. Any help would be appreciated.
  • Luckysgirl
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
125
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
Luckysgirl
L
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
731
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
D
supercharging my v6 4.0
  • dreamerv6stang
  • Jan 12, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
6
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Jul 21, 2025
tovlux6
T
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
653
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?