• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

262AH Comp CAMS- Lash adjuster pump up issue at Higher RFM

  • Thread starter Thread starter SleepyGreen97
  • Start date Start date May 24, 2011
S

SleepyGreen97

New Member
May 24, 2011
10
0
0
May 24, 2011
#1
  • May 24, 2011
  • #1
Have a set of XE262AH comp cams and Beehive 26113-16 springs installed in a 97 Mustang with the PI heads. The Passenger side cam is making a tapping noise and at first the tapping noise was at all RPM and dealer said three would not pump up with oil. So the dealer replaced the three they suspected of being the issue (although, I though you should do all eight) Now they are telling me that the tapping noise and oil issue is at higher RPMs. The dealer did not tell me if the issue was with the same lash valve adjusters that were replaced. Does not seem to be something simple like air in the lash adjusters. The Driver side head seems to run perfect. Any suggestions on this issue??? Has anyone experienced this problem with this set up? Ford seems incapable of fixing the issue...
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
May 24, 2011
#2
  • May 24, 2011
  • #2
SleepyGreen97 said:
Have a set of XE262AH comp cams and Beehive 26113-16 springs installed in a 97 Mustang with the PI heads. The Passenger side cam is making a tapping noise and at first the tapping noise was at all RPM and dealer said three would not pump up with oil. So the dealer replaced the three they suspected of being the issue (although, I though you should do all eight) Now they are telling me that the tapping noise and oil issue is at higher RPMs. The dealer did not tell me if the issue was with the same lash valve adjusters that were replaced. Does not seem to be something simple like air in the lash adjusters. The Driver side head seems to run perfect. Any suggestions on this issue??? Has anyone experienced this problem with this set up? Ford seems incapable of fixing the issue...
Click to expand...

Were the cams degreed when they were installed?

If the driver's side is quiet and the passenger side is making a racket I'd suspect PTV as a possible source of the noise & would pull the front cover and verify the cam timing. If necessary, have them degreed to verify correct installation.
 
S

SleepyGreen97

New Member
May 24, 2011
10
0
0
May 25, 2011
#3
  • May 25, 2011
  • #3
Will the cam timing effect the oil pressure in some of the valves?

Dealer is now telling me that they questioning the Oil Pump Pressure and the area effected is the last part of the engine to recieve oil. I am going to ask them to perform a pressure test and see if that is a problem although I really think its not an issue. The car ran great before they worked on it and only one side of the engine is effected. So my question is if the Timing is off would it effect three valves from pumping up with oil at higher RPM and then causing the tapping valve noise? Thank you for the help!!!!!
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
May 25, 2011
#4
  • May 25, 2011
  • #4
When hydraulic lash adjusters "pump up" it means they act as miniature hydraulic rams and actually hold the valve open bit. Pumped-up HLAs don't tap because there's zero clearance in the valve train.

Honestly, I think you need to find another place to work on the car. The dealer sounds clueless.
 
S

SleepyGreen97

New Member
May 24, 2011
10
0
0
May 25, 2011
#5
  • May 25, 2011
  • #5
time to hit eject

Ihave no faith in their problem solving ability at this point.. Time to try and get money back and find a person who knows what they are doing. Thanks for your help.
 

wmburns

SN Certified Technician
Aug 14, 2009
5,892
514
204
Houston Texas
May 25, 2011
#6
  • May 25, 2011
  • #6
Is this a 97 NPI bottom end mated to PI heads? If so, doesn't this reduce the PTV clearance compared to stock combinations?

Could the combination of a higher lift cam and less clearance be causing PTV contact?
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
May 25, 2011
#7
  • May 25, 2011
  • #7
^ I don't think so burns. It's not the lift that is the problem anyways it's where the intake centerline lies. You could have PTV with a 0.500" cam that had a 105* intake centerline, but not have PTV with a 0.600" cam that had a 112* intake centerline. IIRC when PTV occurs on a modular 2V the valve actually contacts the piston near the edge so a piston with a slightly smaller dish (NPI) shouldn't be a problem. Also the 262's dont have a very aggressive intake centerline.

That said, I've heard Ford cam gears can be off by as much as +/-5*. Add to that the possibility that the Comp Cams may be off by +/- 3 * and you potentially have a situation where the cam is advanced 8* on one bank. I'd think that would most definitely cause PTV. That's why its so important, like you said, to properly degree cams when installing them.
 

nyuk98gt

15 Year Member
Oct 10, 2000
1,427
6
79
Chesterfield, MO
May 25, 2011
#8
  • May 25, 2011
  • #8
The Comp Cams are not "off", they are ground with 4 degrees of advance.

N8Dogg98, you are right and Mr. Burns is right (as usual). The longer duration is what causes PTV clashes. Degreeing the cams is a must even with a mild cam.

Chris
 
S

SleepyGreen97

New Member
May 24, 2011
10
0
0
May 27, 2011
#9
  • May 27, 2011
  • #9
Its now been confirmed by the dealer that there is PTV contact... does not happen at idol but at higher rpm it's still happening. Is there anyway these cams can be timed to work properly and if not would going with a milder cam such as the EX268H solve the PTV issue? I am hearing that Ford used three different suppliers of pistons and five different suppliers of rocker arms. I was told this combo makes it very hard to place any other cam in other than the Stock cams that came with the PI heads. Does anyone have any other suggestions on a fix. Thank you for the help!
 
S

SleepyGreen97

New Member
May 24, 2011
10
0
0
May 27, 2011
#10
  • May 27, 2011
  • #10
wmburns said:
Is this a 97 NPI bottom end mated to PI heads? If so, doesn't this reduce the PTV clearance compared to stock combinations?

Could the combination of a higher lift cam and less clearance be causing PTV contact?
Click to expand...

Yes, after putting in the cams in i come to find out. With the 97 block/ flat head pistons/ PI heads and the 262AH cams it is a clearance issue.
 
M

Midnight2V

Member
Jan 30, 2009
224
0
16
Oklahoma
May 28, 2011
#11
  • May 28, 2011
  • #11
There is no clearance issue with 262ah cams if they are correctly degreed, regardless if they are PI or NPI. Yes, the cams do have four degrees of advance ground in, but the tolerance on the keys is very sloppy. You don't degree these cams by the gear key or the cam key. You degree them using the Intake valve lobe centerline (ICL). The factory gears can be off by 5, even 6 degrees...so can the key on the cam. Add these tolerances up and you have a great recipe for disaster.

There is no difference in the potential for PTV on either PI or NPI pistons, either piston edge comes flush to the block. This is the location on the piston where PTV occurs on these engines.

The big difference on PI and NPI platforms concerning PTV is the intake valves. PI valves have a lip on the bottom which reduces your margin to PTV contact. This is nearly .060", which is a lot.

Your cams weren't properly degreed. Thats how this happened. You may have some bent valves or thrashed valve guides. You should have your passenger head disassembled and inspected. Take a look at your pistons while you are at it.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
May 28, 2011
#12
  • May 28, 2011
  • #12
Good post Midnight.
 
S

SleepyGreen97

New Member
May 24, 2011
10
0
0
May 28, 2011
#13
  • May 28, 2011
  • #13
Thanks for the help! Very Good Info!!!! I will keep you all posted on the outcome.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
May 29, 2011
#14
  • May 29, 2011
  • #14
Midnight is 100% correct, good post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
289
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Engine No start issue AGAIN!
  • ucnhtmenow1
  • Sep 1, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
953
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 11, 2024
89ripper
Engine adjust roller rockers on new 393
  • maxine-70
  • Dec 27, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 30, 2023
AeroCoupe
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
S
Fuel Spits sputter pops and bangs under load. Help wanted
  • sickntired
  • Mar 23, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2024
sickntired
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?