• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

3.55 vs 3.73

  • Thread starter Thread starter Carney Woods
  • Start date Start date Dec 17, 2003

Carney Woods

New Member
Dec 29, 2002
191
1
0
Montreal, Quebec
Dec 17, 2003
#1
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #1
Ok this spring i plan on re-doing the rearend. I plan on going with a 31 spline trac-loc or eaton (undecided), hardened axles, Alum d/s. The question is 3.55 or 3.73's? I still drive the car alot but is there that much advantage w/ 3.73's vs. fuel mileage?
 

Carney Woods

New Member
Dec 29, 2002
191
1
0
Montreal, Quebec
Dec 17, 2003
#2
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #2
Also I have 17 inch rims with 235/40/17 front and will have 255/40/17 in the rear. I plan on running slicks at the track (26.5x8.5 probably) on my old ten holes

waddaya think?
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 17, 2003
#3
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #3
For sure get the 3.73s. Street or strip. I have them now. I did have 3.55s before. I noticed no difference in gas mileage. Plus if you are going to run the slicks the 3.73s would get you out of the hole better.
I still get 25 mpg on the highway if I PLAY NICE at 70-75. In the city i get 15 or so. You should really get the 3.73s. They are good gear for your mods. The gas mileage will still be good.
 

Carney Woods

New Member
Dec 29, 2002
191
1
0
Montreal, Quebec
Dec 17, 2003
#4
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #4
Thanks MIke I think I'm going that way but It never hurts to ask.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 17, 2003
#5
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #5
True. You will love the gear. What do you have now. 2.73s or 3.08. Whichever it is you will be amazed at the difference. You will love stomping on it.
 

Carney Woods

New Member
Dec 29, 2002
191
1
0
Montreal, Quebec
Dec 17, 2003
#6
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #6
I think I have 2.73's since I have almost no other options so I'm really looking forward to the upgrade.

Thanks
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 17, 2003
#7
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #7
Oh man you are going to really love it. I went from 2.73s to 3.55 and that was awsome. But 2.73-3.73 is the good stuff. 3.90s are a good gear also. But 3.73s are a well rounded gear.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 17, 2003
#8
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #8
Carney - if your car is a 5 speed, you can get a good idea of what the change from 2.73's to 3.73's is gonna be like on the Interstate. Simply downshift from 5th to 4th. The ratio change between 5th and 4th is almost identical to the ratio change between 2.73's and 3.73's. That'll show you how much your revs will change; you can even run some highway fuel mileage runs by not shifting out of 4th.
 

88STANGCONVERT

Founding Member
Aug 27, 2001
622
0
0
TRI-CITIES, WASHINGTON
Dec 17, 2003
#9
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #9
3:55 TO 3:73 on the highway is about 200 - 300 rpm at 70mph. I have 3:55's and traction is a problem now on the street, but if you plan to drag it then 3:73 and slicks. Good luck. By the way, you will not regret it, you will feel as if your car just gained 100hp.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 17, 2003
#10
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #10
88Stang - the difference between 3.55's and 3.73's isn't even that many rpm at highway speeds. 3.73/3.55=1.05 -- it's a 5% difference in engine speeds, and at 70, which will be around 2000-2500 rpm, 5% is only 100-125 rpm difference. In my opinion, if you're gonna change the gear and you're trying to decide between 3.55's and 3.73's, I wouldn't let rpm drive the decision. I'd let price, quality, availability drive the decision. There's simply not enough difference between the two to matter much - flip a coin. Especially if you're changing from 2.73's. If you're changing from 3.08's or 3.27's - then the 3.73 makes more sense.

Don't forget to correct your speedo. Here's a link with some info about that.

http://www.geocities.com/mgnedell/notchback/tech/speedo.html
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Dec 17, 2003
#11
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #11
3.73!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Bone Racing

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
1,075
0
0
Long Island, NY
Dec 17, 2003
#12
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #12
373
 

Carney Woods

New Member
Dec 29, 2002
191
1
0
Montreal, Quebec
Dec 21, 2003
#13
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #13
3.73's it is thanx for the feedback
 

Deths91Gt

Founding Member
Sep 30, 1998
1,394
3
39
KS
Dec 21, 2003
#14
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #14
I have 3.55's--most of my cars have always had 3.73's. I think the 3.55 are good but the 3.73's are a better all around gear. The difference in crusing is minimal but the 73's give you better acceleration.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
736
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
718
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
L
Hope someone can give me advice
  • LAFF
  • Mar 11, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 19, 2024
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?