• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

3'' MAF

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shinlee
  • Start date Start date Oct 9, 2006
S

Shinlee

New Member
Feb 10, 2006
146
0
0
Oct 9, 2006
#1
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #1
does anyone know of one thats made?

where can i find this at?

i'd like one for my new intake i am building. I have currently the good ol redneck pvc intake made outta 3'' pipeing, but i have access to free 3'' mandrel bent aluminum, and i'd like to find a 3'' maf sensor to put on my intake, or else is there a way i can just remove the sensor of the 2'' housing it is in currently and somehow rig it into this piping?

thanks for any comments or answers in advance
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Oct 10, 2006
#2
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #2
well i have a 90mm lightning MAF(im using for my car) thats about as close as your gonna get. but without new fuel maps and wiring its not gonna work(i.e not plug and play). you cant just take the core out of a 2" maf and plug it into a 3" pipe...they are calibrated for pipe diameter and distance...so it wouldnt run very good.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Oct 10, 2006
#3
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #3
You'll open a whole can of worms by trying to swap to a larger maf...just use the stock one and a silicone adapter to get it up to 3".
 
S

Shinlee

New Member
Feb 10, 2006
146
0
0
Oct 10, 2006
#4
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #4
what the hell is a silicone adaptor?
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Oct 11, 2006
#5
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #5
A adapter takes you from one size to another. for example you could run a 3" intake and with the right silicone adapter you could go into the 2"maf...kool??
 
S

Shinlee

New Member
Feb 10, 2006
146
0
0
Oct 11, 2006
#6
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #6
oh...well then i got one of those i made outta pvc pipe...was kinda tricky, but i fabbed up something that let the 2" maf fit my 3" pvc pipe intake, but i still want a 3" maf, so as to have a solid 3" intake all the way through.


my question is what all do i need to get a 3" intake and what all is required to make it run right?
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Oct 11, 2006
#7
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #7
Shinlee said:
my question is what all do i need to get a 3" intake and what all is required to make it run right?
Click to expand...

Stinger said:
You'll open a whole can of worms by trying to swap to a larger maf...just use the stock one and a silicone adapter to get it up to 3".
Click to expand...

88stangmangt said:
well i have a 90mm lightning MAF(im using for my car) thats about as close as your gonna get. but without new fuel maps and wiring its not gonna work(i.e not plug and play). you cant just take the core out of a 2" maf and plug it into a 3" pipe...they are calibrated for pipe diameter and distance...so it wouldnt run very good.
Click to expand...
 

Brantley

Founding Member
Feb 29, 2000
1,329
0
0
Memphis, TN
Oct 15, 2006
#8
  • Oct 15, 2006
  • #8
View attachment 432672
 

Brantley

Founding Member
Feb 29, 2000
1,329
0
0
Memphis, TN
Oct 16, 2006
#9
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #9
Oh and I meant to add.. since you haven't said anything about a turbo, I'm assuming it's an N/A engine. You'll totally, absolutely be wasting your money on a 3" MAF sensor and the proper "calibrations" that go along with it. It would take a *LOT* of work before an N/A engine could ever need a MAF that big. Put your money into something that will make a difference like a cam, header, and ported head. If this is a turbo engine, still, why bother with a MAF? I'm not trying to be harsh, but really, don't waste your money. It'll only cause you problems for no gains in the end.
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Oct 16, 2006
#10
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #10
Brantley said:
Put your money into something that will make a difference like a cam, header, and ported head.
Click to expand...
Don't even waste your money on that (at least a header and full exhaust). I speak from full experience. Just a waste of money.
 

Distortion 5.0

New Member
Jul 8, 2005
114
0
0
Oct 23, 2006
#11
  • Oct 23, 2006
  • #11
I offer this info as is. I have a 94 taurus in the front yard that I am parting out. I pulled the maf and it was a little bigger, and the sensor is less restrictive. I had to mangle my connector to get it to plug in (I recommend rewiring the harness leads to the taurus connector, which I was gonna do but wont need to now because the maf will be gone in light of the VAM that is coming with the t-bird) it worked on MY car, with MY setup. It's definatley not 3", and it's not that big a restriction loss, but it did seem to give my car a little boost. FYI, 30 minutes after I did this, my car stopped running. I changed the fuel injectors on a hunch, and it was perfect again, so I am assuming the failure was entirely un-related. I did however encounter a most likely un-related failure a few days later. I highly doubt that the maf swap caused these problems, as they where present with or with out it during my testing phase. Still, I present this to you at your own risk. I feel like it was worth it because I am confident it didn't affect those other things. If the thought of what happened to me shortly after scares you, don't do it, cause it's not that big a gain. But still, if it bugs you to death, and you just have to upgrade your maf, I think this will work without fuel re-mapping and such. But as I said, my setup is pretty radical based against what most people would do.
(P.S., my real problems started after water got into my engine through my non-filtered ram-air.
 
B

Biffmeistro

New Member
Feb 16, 2006
87
0
0
Oct 23, 2006
#12
  • Oct 23, 2006
  • #12
Distortion 5.0 said:
(P.S., my real problems started after water got into my engine through my non-filtered ram-air.
Click to expand...


Please tell me that I misinterprited that.

Are you running your engine without an air filter at all?
 

Distortion 5.0

New Member
Jul 8, 2005
114
0
0
Oct 23, 2006
#13
  • Oct 23, 2006
  • #13
Biffmeistro said:
Please tell me that I misinterprited that.

Are you running your engine without an air filter at all?
Click to expand...
Was running is more like it. Get this, three months of drought, I installed ram-air, three days of pooring rain. I installed an air cleaner the day it first happened, but it was too late. That's what I get for trying to add power. Other than that though, it was a great mod that worked flawlessly. Until water got in.
 
B

Biffmeistro

New Member
Feb 16, 2006
87
0
0
Oct 23, 2006
#14
  • Oct 23, 2006
  • #14
Just go for a K&N They suck air fast enough to please anybody.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
545
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
568
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
245
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
645
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
B
Saying Hi
  • BriansNSane
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
271
The Welcome Wagon Dec 21, 2025
BriansNSane
B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?