• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

300 RWHP and over

  • Thread starter Thread starter fastbluecoupe
  • Start date Start date Jun 8, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last

fastbluecoupe

New Member
Feb 11, 2004
18
0
0
Jun 8, 2004
#1
  • Jun 8, 2004
  • #1
How many of you guys make 300 rwhp or more with stock short block and no power adders just heads cam and intake combo. And if you do whatcha got.
 

admstng

New Member
Dec 12, 2003
128
0
0
Jun 8, 2004
#2
  • Jun 8, 2004
  • #2
I would also like to know this...

hope i'm not hi-jacking (sp?) your thread here.. but i would like to know ANY combo withOUT poweradders, with stock short block that is putting out over 300 rwhp.. not just H/C/I...


 

fastbluecoupe

New Member
Feb 11, 2004
18
0
0
Jun 8, 2004
#3
  • Jun 8, 2004
  • #3
Let me know how clean it runs to, I have to worry about polution in this state
 
9

91StangLX

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
95
0
0
Jun 9, 2004
#4
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #4
fastbluecoupe said:
How many of you guys make 300 rwhp or more with stock short block and no power adders just heads cam and intake combo. And if you do whatcha got.
Click to expand...

Well I am making 331 RWHP with my setup and with no power adders.

Here is my setup:

306
GT40P Heads Ported and Polished with 1.90 x 1.60 Valves
Crane .550 lift Spring Kit
1.7 Roller Rockers
Professional Products Typhoon Intake Manifold Ported and Polished
Mac Cold Air Induction
Anderson Ford Motor Sports N-41 Custom Camshaft
70mm TB
80mm MAS
30lb Injectors
Mac Shorty Headers, Mac Prochamber and Mac Cat back Exhaust
MSD 6AL Ignition with MSD Billet Distributer
MSD 9mm Racing Spark Plug Wires
Iridium Plugs
Mac Underdrive Pullies
Art Carr Street Terminator Transmission with a 3000 Stall converter
FRPP 3:73 rear gears with 31 spline axles, an Eaton 8.8 Differential
Custom Burned Superchips computer chip
255LPH Fuel Pump
Adj. Fuel regulator
Set the timing to 16 degrees advance and the fuel to 37 PSI
Eibach Drag 90/10 shocks, FRPP Progressive rate springs
Eibach upper and lower control arms
Sub Frame connectors
QA1 Tubular K Member
Fiberglass hood with 1.5in cowl
Race Weight with driver is 3120
Price to build about 10K

I average about 30 miles a day driving, I also get 18-20 MPG on the highway and 12-15 MPG in the city. I also have run a best 12.086 @ 113.21 MPH with this setup and I still have power everything including A/C.
 

NoSloCoupes

"I would do anything for a FREE muffler"
Founding Member
Mar 4, 2000
2,705
2
58
Clinton,IL
Jun 9, 2004
#5
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #5
It wasn't a "stock" shortblock, i added a set of stock bore D.S.S tw pistons for valve clearance. Other than that it was stock block,crank, and rods(with a girdle). I made 376rwhp with my n/a 302....AFM ported tw's, AFM N-91 cam, AFM modified tfs street intake, 75mm tb, 80mm mass air, bassani step 1 5/8-1 3/4 longtubes and offroad x, etc.

Jason
 

fastbluecoupe

New Member
Feb 11, 2004
18
0
0
Jun 9, 2004
#6
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #6
I guess there isn't to many stock blocks that where built up so if you have a 306 or something like that let me know. I will probably go .030 over myself when I do this. should of expected that not to many people would build a engine and not bor it
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Jun 9, 2004
#7
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #7
Boring it to a 306 is VERY minimal for power gains. I just think of a 306 as a 302......same thing.
 
M

myroc

New Member
Sep 23, 2003
120
0
0
Jun 9, 2004
#8
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #8
My combo should be close to 300 RWHP ( with out the nitrous) and i have no problem driving it around. Check my sig , heads and intake are all ported and polished and matched. Hope this helps.
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Jun 9, 2004
#9
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #9
I had a "stock" 75k bottom end, AFR 165's, FTI cam, performer rpm, 70mm tb, 76mm maf, 1 5/8 un-equal length shorties to 2 1/2 exhaust. Made 303rwhp/332rwt. Got 17-20 mpg in the city and 23-25 highway with a tremec 3550 and 3.73's. Idled 750 rpm's and streetability was stock like.
mike.

www.flowtechinduction.com
 
C

custom89stang

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
705
0
0
Seattle, WA
Jun 9, 2004
#10
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #10
Umm i can beat you all, 400HP....N/A
 
C

custom89stang

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
705
0
0
Seattle, WA
Jun 9, 2004
#11
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #11
Read it and Weep! wahaha, cylinder heads and roller rockers and a few other trix...400HP to the flywheel

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/116_0307_ford/index.html
 

remat457

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
587
0
16
Seattle/Tacoma
Jun 9, 2004
#12
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #12
There is a writeup in this month's MM&FF with a 340+ RWHP buildup using Holley's SysteMax hci (among other things)..
 

fastbluecoupe

New Member
Feb 11, 2004
18
0
0
Jun 9, 2004
#13
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #13
That car made 291 rwhp in MMFF this month 340 was flywheel.
 

mr5o

Founding Member
Jan 28, 2001
931
0
16
Ontario, Canada
Jun 9, 2004
#14
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #14
mine should have atleast 300rwhp with my mods get the car back this week
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Jun 10, 2004
#15
  • Jun 10, 2004
  • #15
mr5o said:
mine should have atleast 300rwhp with my mods get the car back this week
Click to expand...

I wouldn't say "at least". I would say more like around 290-310 rwhp.
 

Auto Reverse

Member
Jul 22, 2003
265
8
19
Buffalo, NY
Jun 10, 2004
#16
  • Jun 10, 2004
  • #16
I'm making about 325 RWHP. Also, that might be bumped to about 350 RWHP or more with an Ed Curtis cam swap.
 

Auto Reverse

Member
Jul 22, 2003
265
8
19
Buffalo, NY
Jun 10, 2004
#17
  • Jun 10, 2004
  • #17
Nevermind, you asked about stock sjort block...I made 315 RWHP before the DSS 331 went in.
 

remat457

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
587
0
16
Seattle/Tacoma
Jun 16, 2004
#18
  • Jun 16, 2004
  • #18
fastbluecoupe said:
That car made 291 rwhp in MMFF this month 340 was flywheel.
Click to expand...

Oops, sorry about that.

But, I still think that it is pretty good.
 

ironheart1

New Member
Mar 13, 2004
131
0
0
Connecticut
Jun 17, 2004
#19
  • Jun 17, 2004
  • #19
Anyone have comparison numbers between the TFS H/C/I and the Holley Systemax H/C/I?

I'd be curious to see which H/C/I combos are currently the most potent street setups, considering my H/C/I is all bone-stock and I'm looking for a setup.
 

oz

Founding Member
Jun 29, 2000
1,079
10
58
Plymouth, MI
Jun 17, 2004
#20
  • Jun 17, 2004
  • #20
Stock shortblock, 48k miles.
Dyno'd at 287 and then added an electric fan and capacitive discharge ignition. Didn't get it redyno'd but those two changes really woke up the car so I believe I am right at 300 RWHP.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
781
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
299
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
M
My numbers sound right?
  • MiltP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
759
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2026
MiltP
M
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
858
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Fox won't crank over and fuel pump won't kick on.
  • djj62478
  • Jun 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
311
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?