• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

306 carb size.

  • Thread starter Thread starter cas69aus19
  • Start date Start date Sep 15, 2005

cas69aus19

New Member
Sep 14, 2005
50
0
0
B-town NV
Sep 15, 2005
#1
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #1
i am building my 306, but am not sure of what size carb to use. I have tested the calculators out there and they give me a 450cfm, but all the guys at work tell me that it is too small.

I will have .10/.10 under crank, hyper pistons, ported and polished heads with roller rockers & racier springs. edelbrock torker intake or weiand stealth.

plan on turning about 6000 with 2200 rpm stall converter.

any help is greatly appreciated.
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Sep 15, 2005
#2
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #2
What heads? What cam? Roller or flat tappet cam? Assuming 351W heads and a modern flat street grind, I'd go for a 600cfm 4bbl in the brand of your choice.
HTH
--Kyle
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Sep 15, 2005
#3
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #3
450 is too small. 600 would be a good bet.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Sep 15, 2005
#4
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #4
I have the 670 on about 311 cubes and its perfect. See mods in garage.
 

ddonaca351

Active Member
Dec 1, 2002
2,055
1
48
Camas Washington
Sep 15, 2005
#5
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #5
imho.... 600-650 with vacuum secondaries. (holley / deamon / etc)
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Sep 15, 2005
#6
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #6
650 dp!
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 15, 2005
#7
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #7
A Holley 600 or 650 double pumper would be about right. Mechanical secondaries are fun .

My old '65 notchback had a similar setup as yours only with a 289 & 4 speed and a 600 pumper was well suited to it. I have alot more in my current engine and a 650 is about as large as is practical for a mostly street driven car.
 

cas69aus19

New Member
Sep 14, 2005
50
0
0
B-town NV
Sep 16, 2005
#8
  • Sep 16, 2005
  • #8
ok that helps, but in choice of a vacuum secondary or mechanical secondary. A couple guys at work tell me that vacuum sucks for racing because they sometimes hesitate, and that mechanical is the best way to go. What kind of experiences have you guys had.

i will be mainly drag racing and running open course races like the pony express or gamblers run in nevada.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Sep 16, 2005
#9
  • Sep 16, 2005
  • #9
double pumper would work best for you, with mechanical secondaries. Vacuum secondaries are for street cars where mileage is a concern.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Sep 16, 2005
#10
  • Sep 16, 2005
  • #10
Vacuum secondaries are the perfect variable venturi carb. If they bog, they aren't tuned correctly. Both would work fine for your application, but some people are reassured knowing for sure that the secondaries are opening, DPs are good for that.
 

ddonaca351

Active Member
Dec 1, 2002
2,055
1
48
Camas Washington
Sep 16, 2005
#11
  • Sep 16, 2005
  • #11
cas69aus19 said:
ok that helps, but in choice of a vacuum secondary or mechanical secondary. A couple guys at work tell me that vacuum sucks for racing because they sometimes hesitate, and that mechanical is the best way to go. What kind of experiences have you guys had.

i will be mainly drag racing and running open course races like the pony express or gamblers run in nevada.
Click to expand...

imho... then the experts at work dont know how to tune vacuum secondaries as well as they think they do.

Now I do feel that for a race car, a dp is a better choice. HOWEVER the 1% or so, power that you loose with the vac sec is BY FAR made up for by easier drivability and tunability for the street.

Again this is just my .02, and Im sure others will disagree.... but in my near fourty years the above has been my experience.

If you already have a dp, I wouldnt think the difference would be worth the cost of replacing it (but you might be able to trade for free...) but if you are going to buy one, I would HIGHLY reccomend the vs over the dp for a street driven car.

Dave-
 

redhotcomet

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
103
0
0
Western Canada
Sep 17, 2005
#12
  • Sep 17, 2005
  • #12
FWIW...I just bought a Holley Street Avenger 570 for my 306. Right in the little instruction booklet it explains how to tune vacuum secondaries. Something to the tune that if you feel a surge of power when the secondaries open, it is not tuned properly. The power should rise steadily. The surge is actually a result of the motor bogging when the secondaries open too soon, and the engine struggles to catch up and once it does the power increases again.
 

cas69aus19

New Member
Sep 14, 2005
50
0
0
B-town NV
Sep 17, 2005
#13
  • Sep 17, 2005
  • #13
what you just explained there is what my co-worker said happened to him when he had his vs carb on his mustang. sweeet thats a lot of help.
 

ddonaca351

Active Member
Dec 1, 2002
2,055
1
48
Camas Washington
Sep 17, 2005
#14
  • Sep 17, 2005
  • #14
Sounds like a different spring to hold the secondaries to open just a little slower would be in order, or possible a slightly longer profile on the accel pump cam could help too. Might also be a little lean on the primaries, and as the sec open it compunds the problem... either way proper tuning would be the solution, NOT a different carb. But again just mho.

DD
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
F
carb vs cam help needed
  • forango
  • May 2, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
37
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2025
forango
F
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Wheels-Tires LS mii swap and rear rim size/axle questions....
  • 78mIIman
  • Feb 2, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
851
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 6, 2025
78 Mach1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?