• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

306 Engine. Ford Racing Engine Kit. H/C/I

  • Thread starter Thread starter MustangOwner
  • Start date Start date Apr 5, 2007
M

MustangOwner

Banned
Dec 13, 2006
160
0
0
Apr 5, 2007
#1
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #1
I was just wondering how good this setup is? That main reason i ask is because if i go with that setup i would just replace the upper intake manifold with a kenne bell supercharger after awhile. Are those heads good for supercharged applications? I will also be running the other usual upgrades, 75mm TB, 80mm MAF Meter, 42 lb injects, 255 lph fuel pump, water pump, 6G alt upgrade, Fuel rails, radiator, and electric fan. Is there anything else i would need? I want to do this right the first time. And i would also make the stock block a 306. It only has 80K on it and has never seen the track. Would the FRPP engine kit work well with the 306? along with the kennebell? I'm looking for #'s in the 400's and i feel that setup is worthy with a good tune. Thanks for any help.
 

BigHairyMonkey

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2003
411
1
16
Houston (Bellaire) TX
Apr 5, 2007
#2
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #2
you can probably piece together a better kit for the money if you go with mildly used stuff
 

Fett

New Member
Nov 2, 2004
766
6
0
Apr 5, 2007
#3
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #3
I always read that a 306 is really a waste of money, that it doesn't really give you any more power than you can get out of a well built 302. So I am curious to see what the more experienced guys have to say.
 

ShortThrow50

Member
Oct 22, 2006
923
2
16
Pa
Apr 5, 2007
#4
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #4
yeah. they tell me that all a 306 is, is a 302 with the cylinders cleaned up. Why not bump up to a 331 stroker for nearly the same cost
 
D

DocZG

New Member
Jun 7, 2006
72
0
0
San Antonio, Texas
Apr 6, 2007
#5
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #5
you could get 400+ with a Trick Flow top end kit on a 347 or 331 and those heads are much better than the gt40x. I couldnt find the FRPP engine kit but im sure its not much cheaper, if any than the trick kit, and the trick flow is way better.
 

91ghp5.0

Active Member
May 25, 2005
42
0
28
Somewhere
Apr 6, 2007
#6
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #6
Trick flow isn't some God like you all make it out to be. Everyone puts them up on some ridiculous pedestal. The TW heads may be better, but it's not like there is some enormous difference between X heads and TW heads.

You'll have plenty of fun with a B (or E) cam, X heads, 1.7 rockers, and the cobra intake. You might make a few less HP than the TW kit, but who cares. Just make sure you call Ford and get the baffle for the Cobra intake.
 
D

DocZG

New Member
Jun 7, 2006
72
0
0
San Antonio, Texas
Apr 6, 2007
#7
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #7
hey i never mentioned anything about god, i just stated that they were better. I also informed him that he he can reach his goals using the trick flow kit without spending loads of cash on a KB. Im not trying to crush his hope and dreams or anything, im just trying to save him some money.
 

Dean85GT

New Member
Nov 27, 2004
502
1
0
Thorold, Ontario, Canada
Apr 6, 2007
#8
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #8
ShortThrow50 said:
yeah. they tell me that all a 306 is, is a 302 with the cylinders cleaned up. Why not bump up to a 331 stroker for nearly the same cost
Click to expand...


Are you serious? How does an entire stroker kit cost the same amount as a set of pistons required after boring the block 30 over?
 

mustanggt5pt0

New Member
Sep 27, 2004
34
0
0
Cedar Falls, Iowa
Apr 6, 2007
#9
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #9
Fett said:
I always read that a 306 is really a waste of money, that it doesn't really give you any more power than you can get out of a well built 302. So I am curious to see what the more experienced guys have to say.
Click to expand...

For me I went with the 306 because of cost. I know its not going to give me any more power, and to be honest I just want a fun streetable car and not for all out racing. I don't think anyone goes with the 306 for increased power. Total cost was around 400 bucks for forged aluminum pistons, rings, wrist pins, and block bored over + labor and tax. I don't think that was such a bad deal If I were to do a stroker kit I'd want forged everything which dramatically increases the price of things.
 

ShortThrow50

Member
Oct 22, 2006
923
2
16
Pa
Apr 6, 2007
#10
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #10
Dean85GT said:
Are you serious? How does an entire stroker kit cost the same amount as a set of pistons required after boring the block 30 over?
Click to expand...

Iam sorry man for the way my post sounded. It does look ridiculous the way it sounds. I was leaning towards purchasing a short block assembly. Its worth it that way imo to upgrade for a few bucks.
 

Fett

New Member
Nov 2, 2004
766
6
0
Apr 6, 2007
#11
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #11
mustanggt5pt0 said:
For me I went with the 306 because of cost. I know its not going to give me any more power, and to be honest I just want a fun streetable car and not for all out racing. I don't think anyone goes with the 306 for increased power. Total cost was around 400 bucks for forged aluminum pistons, rings, wrist pins, and block bored over + labor and tax. I don't think that was such a bad deal If I were to do a stroker kit I'd want forged everything which dramatically increases the price of things.
Click to expand...

Then why do people even bother to do it? I really don't get the whole idea of going 306, it yields no performance advantage, but costs more than just rebuilding a 302. If I was going to bother having a 302 bored over, I would go further than just 306.
 

mustanggt5pt0

New Member
Sep 27, 2004
34
0
0
Cedar Falls, Iowa
Apr 6, 2007
#12
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #12
Fett said:
Then why do people even bother to do it? I really don't get the whole idea of going 306, it yields no performance advantage, but costs more than just rebuilding a 302. If I was going to bother having a 302 bored over, I would go further than just 306.
Click to expand...

People rebuild 302s because they are worn out and have issues like oil consumption.
 
M

MustangOwner

Banned
Dec 13, 2006
160
0
0
Apr 6, 2007
#13
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #13
hah nobodys answered my question about how good the setup is? Just fighting over the 306 lol. My neighbor has a 306 with all trick flow and a nov1 2000 and the usual others and hes putting out 525 rwhp on 12 lbs boost. Sounds good to me. I want a 306.
 

BigHairyMonkey

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2003
411
1
16
Houston (Bellaire) TX
Apr 6, 2007
#14
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #14
^ we're talking about N/A numbers, the more displacement the more hp/ per pound of boost. Imagine what your neighbors car would put down with a 331 or 347 or 393
 

91ghp5.0

Active Member
May 25, 2005
42
0
28
Somewhere
Apr 6, 2007
#15
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #15
91FoxSaleenGTLX said:
hah nobodys answered my question about how good the setup is? Just fighting over the 306 lol. My neighbor has a 306 with all trick flow and a nov1 2000 and the usual others and hes putting out 525 rwhp on 12 lbs boost. Sounds good to me. I want a 306.
Click to expand...

I answered your question, reread my post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
728
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
613
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
373
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?