• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

331 Cam Combo Suggestions/opinions

  • Thread starter Thread starter fiveohlover
  • Start date Start date Feb 23, 2014
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,643
214
Acworth, GA
Feb 25, 2014
#21
  • Feb 25, 2014
  • #21
I had a TF3 in my last engine. It peaked at 5600 rpms. I don't have much faith in used cams either. I always considered them to be pretty much worthless. When I took it out, there didn't appear to be anything wrong with it, and still didn't feel right asking money for it. I traded it for a 12 pack of Fat Tire.

Kurt
 

fiveohlover

Member
Oct 13, 2011
187
5
19
mn
Feb 26, 2014
#22
  • Feb 26, 2014
  • #22
Ya i know my gt 40 lower isnt that great, but doesnt that upper box help with the upper rpm? I read that they are made for all top end, isn't that what the biger cams are made fro also?
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Feb 26, 2014
#23
  • Feb 26, 2014
  • #23
fiveohlover said:
Ya i know my gt 40 lower isnt that great, but doesnt that upper box help with the upper rpm? I read that they are made for all top end, isn't that what the biger cams are made fro also?
Click to expand...
Yes the upper will like higher rpms but that lower is still a choke point. You are going to be hard pressed to make power above 6k rpms. You can make good mid to upper rpm power with your setup. Just not going to pull to 65-7k productively. Also the maf/tb combo is too small IMO for max power/breathing/rpm capability. If it's just a street car with the occasional strip pass I'd concentrate on mid rpm range with good throttle response and not worry about high rpm rips. And stock blocks don't like 65-7k rpms anyway.
 

fiveohlover

Member
Oct 13, 2011
187
5
19
mn
Feb 26, 2014
#24
  • Feb 26, 2014
  • #24
ya i will have to do some upgrading some day
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Feb 26, 2014
#25
  • Feb 26, 2014
  • #25
90lxcoupe said:
was that on a stock ECU and stock tach? If so, you werent really revving to 6700. Ive seen stock tach's off 500-800 rpms when they got to the dyno.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Can't remember for certain with regards to the SN95 ECU, but the A9L in the Fox body ends the party at about 6,250RPM unless you have the rev limter tuned out of it.

I've got the same XE274HR in my 331, less robust heads, but a much better intake and although it'll pull all the way to the limiter, I'm certain it would sign of long before 6,800RPM.

Personally, I'd be less concerned about the cam selection on this one and abandon the idea of using that GT40 intake. It'll be torquey, but it's gonna cork your horsepower figures like there's no tomorrow!
 

fiveohlover

Member
Oct 13, 2011
187
5
19
mn
Feb 27, 2014
#26
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #26
Gearbanger 101 said:
Agreed. Can't remember for certain with regards to the SN95 ECU, but the A9L in the Fox body ends the party at about 6,250RPM unless you have the rev limter tuned out of it.

I've got the same XE274HR in my 331, less robust heads, but a much better intake and although it'll pull all the way to the limiter, I'm certain it would sign of long before 6,800RPM.

Personally, I'd be less concerned about the cam selection on this one and abandon the idea of using that GT40 intake. It'll be torquey, but it's gonna cork your horsepower figures like there's no tomorrow!
Click to expand...
good info, but ya i have a msd 6al on my car now, so where does your car make most of its power at with the xe 274hr?
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Feb 27, 2014
#27
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #27
The 6al wont make the car rev any further. The factory ECU cant keep up and slows way down past 6000rpms. Even with the factory limiter removed, the A9l will limit RPMs. Some guys have done cristal mods to the ECU, but that is hit or miss from what i have read.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Feb 27, 2014
#28
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #28
Custom. It's damn near the same cost. No excuse there really. But if it were me and I was spending some coin on a short block I'd be willing to take my time to save and put a solid valvetrain together for it. That intakes really not gonna cut it either way
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Feb 27, 2014
#29
  • Feb 27, 2014
  • #29
fiveohlover said:
good info, but ya i have a msd 6al on my car now, so where does your car make most of its power at with the xe 274hr?
Click to expand...

The 6AL's only really nice feature is the soft touch REV limiter IMO. Otherwise I don't have much use for them. The stock ignition works pretty well. The problem with using the 6AL, to set your REV limit is that they only cut spark.....not the fuel like the stock ECU does. Cutting spark is a good thing, but when the ECU says sorry....no more fuel for you at the factory set 6,250RPM range, the party is over, regardless where you've got the MSD set.

With the XE274HR in there, the engine is a little softer than stock down low, but really comes on above 3,000RPM and carries on with a nice steady pull all the way though to red line. Where the stock cam starts to fall off shortly after about 5,400RPM, the 274 seems to just keep pedalling. How your cam performs will be largely dependant on your supporting components. In you case, the GT40 lower you have is going to put an end to the power band long before your cam will.

If you're dead set on sticking with that GT40, then go with a cam that takes advantage of your power curve at a lower RPM and works best below the 6,000RPM range. You'll have a much nicer and most likely faster car for it.
 
Reactions: tannerc91gt

fiveohlover

Member
Oct 13, 2011
187
5
19
mn
Feb 28, 2014
#30
  • Feb 28, 2014
  • #30
Hey thanks for the good info guys
 
Reactions: 90lxcoupe
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
T
Engine 306 to 331
  • Treachery
  • Jul 1, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 2, 2020
nickyb
first time 331 build
  • rademf64
  • Jun 6, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2019
Monkeybutt2000
M
S
Fox Help finishing combo for 1992 GT
  • SLC_Stang
  • Dec 31, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2023
Drwho77
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?