• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

331 or 347 Stroker?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tkolstad
  • Start date Start date Aug 10, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

68torinogt

Hey guys, guess what--I have a bi-pass!!!
Mar 21, 2006
0
0
53
Welcome my son, welcome to the machine
Aug 10, 2006
#21
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #21
what kind of difference is your cylinder walls making (just for future reference)?
 
R

R2D2

Aug 10, 2006
#22
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #22
Hmm whats so thin about the cylinders on a 347? No different than a 306
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 11, 2006
#23
  • Aug 11, 2006
  • #23
Cylinder walls are the same, but the approach of the assembly is steeper against the sidewalls. Rod ratio that is. That is greater "sideloading", that is what he is referring to. Did I say it is devestating to the engine, nope, so don't go off

More force equals more likely to "not be good"
 
R

R2D2

Aug 11, 2006
#24
  • Aug 11, 2006
  • #24
5spd GT said:
Cylinder walls are the same, but the approach of the assembly is steeper against the sidewalls. Rod ratio that is. That is greater "sideloading", that is what he is referring to. Did I say it is devestating to the engine, nope, so don't go off

More force equals more likely to "not be good"
Click to expand...
more mythical rod ratio nonsense from 1983 in the sbc circles. Carry on
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 11, 2006
#25
  • Aug 11, 2006
  • #25
It isn't mythical. It has a steeper rod ratio. I didn't say it would kill the motor. What is so "mythical". Does the 3.4" stroke have less stress on the sidewalls than a 3" stroke?
 
R

R2D2

Aug 11, 2006
#26
  • Aug 11, 2006
  • #26
are you the same guy on corral?
 

nosmatt

Founding Member
Oct 13, 2000
1,356
0
37
Bass Lake, Ca
Aug 11, 2006
#27
  • Aug 11, 2006
  • #27
of course he is, read the post.


anyhoo, IMHO, if your planning a s/c, dont build a stroker UNLESS you use a good (read: r302, dart, world, boss) block. it is just more wasted money.


aftermarket .030 pistons with reliefs, and stock crank/rods is the most cost effective way.
if you buy good top end parts, you will still be able to outpower the stock block on pump gas.



again, MHO!



good luck either way.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 11, 2006
#28
  • Aug 11, 2006
  • #28
Yes sir

Just some one tell me that a 3.4" stroke with a 5.315/5.4" rod has less pressure applied to the outer cylinder walls than a 3" stroke with a 5.090" rod. Tell me which ones you see last longer. In any shortblock. Yes, there are even steeper rod ratios than a 3.4" stroker, but do you see them lasting 200,000 or 250,000 on a regular basis compared to those with a steeper condition.
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Aug 12, 2006
#29
  • Aug 12, 2006
  • #29
Their have been some pretty informative responces in this thread.

I've built both. I don't have any experience with a boosted 331 or 347 so I am of no use there. I can tell you that a 500fwhp streetable 347 is very dooable. I have a combo in the works that with 260cfm heads and 11.5:1 CR will make that kind of power. That's before "the big shot". For a daily driven or even a weekend warrior their is not a dout in my mind that the best way to make big hp is to have a lot of the power on throttle and have the rest of the power on tap.


Blocks....

As mentioned get a quality block. I opted for a 69-70 boss block and it cost 1100. Not only are they a hi po part they are highly sought after by the boss people. I'm sure that most of the people on the forum have heard the myth of the Mexican block. In std bore or .010 it will take 600. I don't believe it. I've heard too many people say that it won't hold up. Keep in mind that just comes from what people told me. Not personal experence.
 
R

R2D2

Aug 12, 2006
#30
  • Aug 12, 2006
  • #30
There really is no myth to the mexican block, they are by far stronger when compared to a late model block, all it takes is one visual look at the main webbing to see. The other higher nickel content theory is mythical. The mexican block will handle some serious power. I have 1 member running a 306 all motor, 2860lbs, car goes 10 teens. Do the math on that one. Will go 9.90's very shortly with a few small changes.
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Aug 12, 2006
#31
  • Aug 12, 2006
  • #31
I won't confirm or deny it untill I see it for myeslf. Like I said I have no experence with the mexican block.
 
R

R2D2

Aug 12, 2006
#32
  • Aug 12, 2006
  • #32
giddyup306 said:
I won't confirm or deny it untill I see it for myeslf. Like I said I have no experence with the mexican block.
Click to expand...
look at the main webbing, its glaring
 

Attachments

  • mex1.webp
    15.7 KB · Views: 130

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Aug 12, 2006
#33
  • Aug 12, 2006
  • #33
i went with a 347 and im slapping on a novi2000 @ about 10psi. compression is very important when going boosted so make sure to keep it low if you decide on a supercharger.

a dart block is always nice too

 
T

tkolstad

New Member
May 2, 2006
16
0
0
Rochester, Ny
Aug 14, 2006
#34
  • Aug 14, 2006
  • #34
Thanks you guys have been big time helpfull, gave me a bunch of new ideas!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Electrical Spark Plugs
  • jimzzilla
  • Feb 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
853
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 28, 2026
jimzzilla
Fuel SN95.0 fuel system
  • RedFury5.0
  • Apr 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
298
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 22, 2025
AeroCoupe
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
C
C4 trans help needed
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
138
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2026
CPH89LX
C
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
588
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?