• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

331 or 347??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Project 77
  • Start date Start date Nov 21, 2003
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Project 77

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
370
2
16
Bernville PA
Nov 21, 2003
#1
  • Nov 21, 2003
  • #1
Hello ladies/gentlemen....I have a question. I have a 95 GT has a 302 X cam, 24 poiund Injectors yadda yadda. Thie winter I want to replace the motor with a 331 or 347 what I want to know is which one is the prefered motor? This car is pretty much a weekend driver and it will see the dragstrip. Not very concerned about fuel mileage, just how well it runs. thanks again...i'l post some pics this week of the green monster
 
R

Rockin95Stang

New Member
Jul 13, 2002
20
0
1
Ft Walton Beach, Florida
Nov 21, 2003
#2
  • Nov 21, 2003
  • #2
I have a 331 built by Keith Craft and love it. Produces great power/torque for the set-up that I have and runs excellent right out of the crate. Only have 6,000 on it right now, so I'll see how it holds out in the long run. So far, no complaints.
http://www.keithcraft.com/index.htm


Project 77 said:
Hello ladies/gentlemen....I have a question. I have a 95 GT has a 302 X cam, 24 poiund Injectors yadda yadda. Thie winter I want to replace the motor with a 331 or 347 what I want to know is which one is the prefered motor? This car is pretty much a weekend driver and it will see the dragstrip. Not very concerned about fuel mileage, just how well it runs. thanks again...i'l post some pics this week of the green monster
Click to expand...
 
9

93cobra12

New Member
Nov 21, 2003
531
0
0
Seatte, WA
Nov 21, 2003
#3
  • Nov 21, 2003
  • #3
If i was to get a stroker motor I would too get a 331.. Its alot more realiabe I heared an they have a great top end.. TQ isnt as torquey as a 347 but once you get up there it'll take a 347 any day.. As of right now im saving up for that motor, I was looking at kieth craft myself but decided to have a custom built motor.. If not It will be between keith craft or bennit racing.. But If i were to choose I would go with a 331.. All the way !!
 
R

ray95

New Member
Aug 4, 2002
37
0
0
mass
Nov 21, 2003
#4
  • Nov 21, 2003
  • #4
93cobra12 said:
If i was to get a stroker motor I would too get a 331.. Its alot more realiabe I heared an they have a great top end.. TQ isnt as torquey as a 347 but once you get up there it'll take a 347 any day.. As of right now im saving up for that motor, I was looking at kieth craft myself but decided to have a custom built motor.. If not It will be between keith craft or bennit racing.. But If i were to choose I would go with a 331.. All the way !!
Click to expand...
check out imbperformance.com These are some of the guys that used to work at keithcraft.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 21, 2003
#5
  • Nov 21, 2003
  • #5
I'd go 347 without a doubt. Why give up the extra cubes? Reliability issues and oil consumption problems are rumors. There are MANY 347's out there that live a hard yet healthy life.
 

GTWayne

Founding Member
Nov 7, 2002
161
0
0
Albuquerque, NM
Nov 21, 2003
#6
  • Nov 21, 2003
  • #6
Which one 331/347

93cobra12 said:
If i was to get a stroker motor I would too get a 331.. Its alot more realiabe I heared an they have a great top end.. TQ isnt as torquey as a 347 but once you get up there it'll take a 347 any day.. As of right now im saving up for that motor, I was looking at kieth craft myself but decided to have a custom built motor.. If not It will be between keith craft or bennit racing.. But If i were to choose I would go with a 331.. All the way !!
Click to expand...

Depends on how long you want it to last and how much power you want to make. Just because of what makes the extra cubic inches from a "stroked" motor: distance the piston rod on the crank travels, lengthening the distance the piston travels up and down means the rod angle is more acute and increases stress on the cylinder wall since the piston is pushing more toward it than up and down: 347 would then theoretically have a shorter life expectancy. They are both capable of producting a lot of power and torque over the stock 302.

A good compromise is the 331 since it has a longer wear expectancy, great power and torque potential. However there are guys out there making a lot of power w/306 combos too.
Wayne
 

DavidF

New Member
Nov 19, 2003
158
0
0
Ventura, Ca
Nov 21, 2003
#7
  • Nov 21, 2003
  • #7
Hi Im new to this forum but not new to Mustangs. I have an CHP 347 and love it. I have about 10k on it so far with out any complaints. I drive it every day its my only car. It doesnt consume any more oil then when it was stock.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 21, 2003
#8
  • Nov 21, 2003
  • #8
Welcome David!
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Nov 21, 2003
#9
  • Nov 21, 2003
  • #9
get a 342... so you can have the block honed and rebuild it if you ever have isses...problem solved
 

moneypit94

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,723
2
39
Macomb, IL
Nov 21, 2003
#10
  • Nov 21, 2003
  • #10
Im a little bias with the 331, but i think that both are good choices. I would suggest getting some good rods though.

If your building a motor you need to think about a few things.

Are you eventually going to put a blower on it, or run the piss out of it? If so you might want to just start off with a decent block (dart, sportsman, r302, or even an F302 block ) And if your going to add a supercharger or a turbo then you will want to start off with a lower compression.

You don't have to do any of that but you start to play with fire if you don't.

But either way you go, 331 or 347, if done right can be very dependable engines.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 21, 2003
#11
  • Nov 21, 2003
  • #11
F302??? What is that, I'm not familiar with that one.
 

moneypit94

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,723
2
39
Macomb, IL
Nov 21, 2003
#12
  • Nov 21, 2003
  • #12
Killercanary said:
F302??? What is that, I'm not familiar with that one.
Click to expand...
M-6010-F302 302 Race Block-4-Bolt Main Caps(8.200" Deck)Aluminum $3499.99

A bad boy of a block...


M-6010-B50 302 Heavy Duty "Sportsman" Block(8.200" Deck)Cast Iron $999.99
M-6010-R302 302 Race Block-4-Bolt Mains on #'s 2/3/4(8.200" Deck)Cast Iron $1799.99
M-6010-S302 302 Race Block-4-Bolt Mains on #'s 2/3/4(8.700" Deck)Cast Iron $1799.99
M-6010-F302 302 Race Block-4-Bolt Main Caps(8.200" Deck)Aluminum $3499.99
M-6010-F87 302 Race Block-4-Bolt Main Caps(8.700" Deck)Aluminum $3499.99

these part numbers are according to need-4-speed (seem to be FMS numbers)
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 21, 2003
#13
  • Nov 21, 2003
  • #13
Ohhh.... I don't think that block is available though anymore. If it is its a new introduction piece as FMS used to sell an all aluminum blokc but discontinued it years ago, same with the old A4 block which was the pre-R block.
 
S

Sup95Cobra

Member
Nov 10, 2002
174
0
16
In front of you!!
Nov 21, 2003
#14
  • Nov 21, 2003
  • #14
I would go with a 331 if the car will see more street duty and a 347 if it will see the track more!
 
B

buzntxn

New Member
Nov 17, 2003
12
0
0
Texas
Nov 22, 2003
#15
  • Nov 22, 2003
  • #15
well the biggest stroker kit i've seen is 348, there's no replacement for displacement, quit playin around and just buy a 351w or bigger is better
 
S

sbford

New Member
Jul 9, 2003
75
0
0
ohio
Nov 22, 2003
#16
  • Nov 22, 2003
  • #16
my vote is for the 347, like killercranary stated, there are to many stories about 347s having rod problems and oil consumption concerns. IT DEPENDS ON WHO MACHINES THEM AND BUILDS THEM!

Thats my thoughts
Nate
 
6

67stang390

New Member
May 29, 2003
379
0
0
Seattle, WA(home) ASU(college)
Nov 22, 2003
#17
  • Nov 22, 2003
  • #17
I'm building a 347 right now for my 94 GT daily driver. Yes, it's true the 347 has a higher rod ratio than a 331, which puts more stress on the cylinder walls. However, the 347 also starts making power at lower RPMs, so as far as lasting longer, I'd say it comes down to how well the engine is built. Also, most of the oil burning problems you hear of were solved years ago. People burn oil in any incorrectly built engine, be it a 347 or a 306.
 

moneypit94

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,723
2
39
Macomb, IL
Nov 22, 2003
#18
  • Nov 22, 2003
  • #18
Killercanary said:
Ohhh.... I don't think that block is available though anymore. If it is its a new introduction piece as FMS used to sell an all aluminum blokc but discontinued it years ago, same with the old A4 block which was the pre-R block.
Click to expand...
that would exlpain why i could really only find it on one website. Could be that they have some left over too?
 

Eric94GTvert

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
596
1
16
PA, Nazareth
Nov 22, 2003
#19
  • Nov 22, 2003
  • #19
moneypit94 said:
that would exlpain why i could really only find it on one website. Could be that they have some left over too?
Click to expand...

@ $3,500, I'd imagine they have a bunch left over.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Nov 22, 2003
#20
  • Nov 22, 2003
  • #20
what would you suggest for a supercharged engine. I was lookin at DSS for a 331 short block b/c the 347 said for "mild boost" which makes me a little bit nervous about it. I plan on running something in the area of 15#s. what you guys think?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
712
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
J
Forced Induction Turbo SBF Fuel system RECOMMENDATION
  • Jschallitz
  • Jul 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 2, 2024
Monkeybutt2000
M
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?