• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

331 vs 347

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1991vert
  • Start date Start date Jul 19, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Jul 19, 2005
#1
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #1
ok im reconsidering some things. im buying the dart block for sure. this is where i can't decide. a 306 with a blower or something along the lines of a 331-347.

my main question is my cylinder heads. i have AFR 165's and dont know if they will be too small. so here's a list of questions if someone could answer them for me.

1) Are the 165's too small for a 331-347?

2) Do stroker kits increase emissions

3) 331 or 347; reason for choice also please.



thanks,
Chris

p.s. sorry for so many questions
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Jul 19, 2005
#2
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #2
ttt
 

stock 92 gt

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
165
0
0
Jul 19, 2005
#3
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #3
1) yes too small, go with some 185s
2) i dont know
3)347 .....its a dart block, why not go for a 347 eh?
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Jul 19, 2005
#4
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #4
3) i have 165's and really dont want to sell them to buy another set and a 347 i dont think would be too emissions friendly, but i no one has responded to that yet
 
I

IntenseBlue

Member
Jul 10, 2005
946
0
16
Jul 19, 2005
#5
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #5
They're not too small. They wan't make as much power as most 347s you'll see b/c most are built to perform as best they can. AFRs flow more than GT40s and 351 Lightnings do fine with those. They won't make near as much power as 185s, but they're not too small.
 
1

1990LXDropTop

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
430
0
0
Western Massachusetts
Jul 23, 2005
#6
  • Jul 23, 2005
  • #6
I would just do a 306. Most people seem to favor a good ole 302 or stout 306 over a 347. A built 306 with your combo and maybe a little boost would be heaven. Just my .02
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jul 23, 2005
#7
  • Jul 23, 2005
  • #7
If your going to do a Dart block then go ahead and get all forged internals and do the 347. Maby get the wide bore version and I think that adds up to a 368 or something?
 

boomr

Member
Oct 18, 2003
51
0
7
WA
Jul 24, 2005
#8
  • Jul 24, 2005
  • #8
90mustangGT said:
If your going to do a Dart block then go ahead and get all forged internals and do the 347. Maby get the wide bore version and I think that adds up to a 368 or something?
Click to expand...

I thought it worked out to about a 363.



1) Are the 165's too small for a 331-347? A 306 with a blower or something along the lines of a 331-347.

Maybe not for a 331 n/a motor, but if your going to run a blower or something you might want to consider letting the motor breath.

2) Do stroker kits increase emissions?

I wouldn't think so, if it was tuned correctly

3) 331 or 347; reason for choice also please.

Why not get the maximum bang for you buck
 

9T3SVT

New Member
Apr 18, 2004
84
0
0
Jul 24, 2005
#9
  • Jul 24, 2005
  • #9
Blown 331 IMO and the 165's will be fine I make lot's of power with them and they still have room to grow
 

just4bob50

Active Member
Apr 2, 2005
504
5
28
Pa.
Jul 24, 2005
#10
  • Jul 24, 2005
  • #10
the Aug. 2005 5.0 just did an article on that exact subject. They used a 347 motor totest on and they found that both heads were dead even upto about 3700rpms. after that the 185's took over. but the peak power difference was 17hp. & 16tq. thats on an engine dyno. so that about 10-12 difference at the wheels. Not worth buying new heads over again if you ask me.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Jul 24, 2005
#11
  • Jul 24, 2005
  • #11
1991vert said:
1) Are the 165's too small for a 331-347?

2) Do stroker kits increase emissions

3) 331 or 347; reason for choice also please.
Click to expand...

No, they're not too small if you plan your combination around them. Forced induction with those heads would be sweet.

Strokers don't have migher emissions as a rule. Your cam will have a lot to do with how well it does on emissions. It just so happens that a lot of really great blower cams also do well on the sniffer.

None of the above. If it's a brand new DART block then use the stock bore pistons and stroke it! 327 would be (and is) my caliber of choice.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
Jul 24, 2005
#12
  • Jul 24, 2005
  • #12
Go for the 347, there is no purpose for a 331, the cost will be almost identical to build both.

Sell the afr 165's and buy the 185's, not because you have to, but because afr's have a high resale value, and you'll only lose about $300. Build it once and build it right.

If done right you won't really even need the blower, you can build the 347 to spin up to 7grand, and with the bigger heads you'll have the power of a blower car, without a blower.

I've seen this setup many times, just with different heads, it's a 10sec NA daily driver capable car. No blowing head gaskets here.
 
S

strokedandblown

Banned
May 3, 2005
555
0
0
USA
Jul 24, 2005
#13
  • Jul 24, 2005
  • #13
2000xp8 said:
Go for the 347, there is no purpose for a 331, the cost will be almost identical to build both.
Click to expand...
^ I agree. I stayed with my 331 b/c i already had the ballanced crank, but i would have gone 347 if i had to start from scratch. I would recomend a bigger set of heads and at least a T trim or equivalant. That way you can get it to run @ lower boost and then increase as you get the tune down/ or feel comfortable. The tune with be your #1 issue, i ended up going with a stand alone system b/c the A9L was just @ its limits by far. A PMS or Tweeker would be my second choice b/c you can change the tune. and last choice would be a chip b/c your always stuck w/ one tune and need to reflash for any upgrade. Your on the right track!
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Jul 24, 2005
#14
  • Jul 24, 2005
  • #14
im putting afr 185s on my 331...the bigger the displacement the more air the motor is going to want
 

89CopCoupe

Banned
Feb 17, 2004
606
0
0
Post Count City
Jul 24, 2005
#15
  • Jul 24, 2005
  • #15
Food for thought: On an 8.2 deck, a 331 gives you more piston "meat".
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jul 24, 2005
#16
  • Jul 24, 2005
  • #16
89CopCoupe said:
Food for thought: On an 8.2 deck, a 331 gives you more piston "meat".
Click to expand...

My 347 with the 5.315" rods has the same "extra meat" as the 331 because I use 331 pistons Its the same part # if you look on coasthigh.com.


If you were gonna sell the 165's for different afr's get 205's. Even though the 165's are a bit small, they'll still make good power especially with a charger. To make a small head make big power, you'll need a good custom cam as valve timing will be critical.

I'd do at least a 347 since its a dart block. 3.40 stroke for sure, you pick the bore size.
 

89CopCoupe

Banned
Feb 17, 2004
606
0
0
Post Count City
Jul 24, 2005
#17
  • Jul 24, 2005
  • #17
Grn92LX said:
My 347 with the 5.315" rods has the same "extra meat" as the 331 because I use 331 pistons Its the same part # if you look on coasthigh.com.
Click to expand...

Sure, but your 347 with a 5.315 rod will not have as much meat as a 331 with 5.315 rods ... anyhow.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jul 24, 2005
#18
  • Jul 24, 2005
  • #18
89CopCoupe said:
Sure, but your 347 with a 5.315 rod will not have as much meat as a 331 with 5.315 rods ... anyhow.
Click to expand...

Yah true, But I care about power, not meat
 

89CopCoupe

Banned
Feb 17, 2004
606
0
0
Post Count City
Jul 24, 2005
#19
  • Jul 24, 2005
  • #19
Why not built a 408 then
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jul 24, 2005
#20
  • Jul 24, 2005
  • #20
89CopCoupe said:
Why not built a 408 then
Click to expand...


I care about money more than power And I REFUSE to EVER put a cowl hood on my car. I would have needed one to run the right efi intake on a 408. Believe me, I considered it, then I realized a 347 was my only real bet.

Mike
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
409
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
561
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?