• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

347- AFR 185's, Edel RPM II and custom cam

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brian992V
  • Start date Start date Sep 9, 2006

Brian992V

Founding Member
Feb 11, 2000
880
0
0
Lexington,KY
Sep 9, 2006
#1
  • Sep 9, 2006
  • #1
Friend is putting together a 347 and he will be using AFR 185's, Edelbrock RPM II intake, custom cam, 1 3/4 full length headers, 75mm t/b and 80mm MAF sensor. After a tune, what kind of horsepower should he have at the rear wheels?
 

eagleautosports

New Member
Jul 7, 2006
139
0
0
Mebane NC
Sep 9, 2006
#2
  • Sep 9, 2006
  • #2
Should be around 400 easy depending on the cam. But know that RPM II is more for the upper rpm than the standard RPM, even though it's supposed to have the same RPM band. It'll pull all the way to 6800-7000, I've seen one do it.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Sep 9, 2006
#3
  • Sep 9, 2006
  • #3
Depends what his goals were when he had the custom cam designed. 375-425 is what i'd say.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 9, 2006
#4
  • Sep 9, 2006
  • #4
Depends on how track oriented the combo is...

a/c delete? power steering delete? aluminum flywheel? etc...

That combo is exactly the same combo I do if I was doing one...
 

Quikstang

Founding Member
Mar 9, 2000
846
0
0
Orlando FL
Sep 9, 2006
#5
  • Sep 9, 2006
  • #5
Yea, I would def be looking for 375 - 425 ish with a good tune and quality machine work.
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Sep 9, 2006
#6
  • Sep 9, 2006
  • #6
Grn92LX said:
Depends what his goals were when he had the custom cam designed. 375-425 is what i'd say.
Click to expand...

yep.
 

bob331T76

New Member
Aug 28, 2005
76
0
0
so cal
Sep 9, 2006
#7
  • Sep 9, 2006
  • #7
N8Miller said:
yep.
Click to expand...
second that!:SNSign:
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 10, 2006
#8
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #8
Your not going to get 50rwhp from just the difference in one custom cam to the next. Other factors are in that...
 

aleborjas

New Member
Sep 11, 2005
610
0
0
Sep 10, 2006
#9
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #9
and what about the same combo with XE274 cam,10.1 CR, 30 pounders, RPM intake ported, 70mm TB, like how many RWHP and torque?
 
R

r.barn5.0

New Member
May 21, 2006
107
0
0
Sep 10, 2006
#10
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #10
You'll be limiting your power on the 347 using a 302 cam
strokers need more duration.

mo-better cam for 347
http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/stor...irect&categoryId=41269&parentCategoryId=10707

drop'n one in my 351W project now.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 10, 2006
#11
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #11
There is a very basic reason larger cube engines need more duration - it is the ratio of displacement growth to limited valve size growth. Since the valve size is limited much more than displacement growth, more duration is needed to fill a cylinder.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 10, 2006
#12
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #12
Yep, 302 cams don't need all that duration because it wouldn't do any good, the cylinders can only feel up so much...larger displacment has more room to fill. So let the valve be open longer (longer duration, ex: 228...to 238*) to allow more air in.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
help me understand calibrated maf sensors and injectors
  • stackz
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?