• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

347 into our Cars??????

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Red Monster
  • Start date Start date May 3, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
F

fiveo'cobra

New Member
Oct 7, 2004
241
0
0
SC
May 3, 2006
#21
  • May 3, 2006
  • #21
Killercanary said:
I watched a buddy of mine go 11.2 at 122mph this weekend with a 331 in a fox hatch. It has a TFS bos R intake, TW 205 heads, a comp 274 (I think) cam, and he was hitting the rev limiter right before the finish line at 6900rpms (he has an extender). Its a well thought out combo that EASILY has more in it. he's switching to a 90mm TB and a few other little tricks.
I somehow doubt it'd be that fast with a 306.
Click to expand...


Think you mighta missed the part where i said with a 100 shot. Not all motor runs.
 

mootang

New Member
Dec 5, 2004
907
0
0
texas
May 3, 2006
#22
  • May 3, 2006
  • #22
get the extra cubes and do it right like this guy......

http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2005/02/YellowFever/index.php
 

Yobi1Kanobi

Member
Apr 9, 2003
559
0
16
May 3, 2006
#23
  • May 3, 2006
  • #23
You know when I was shopping for parts...quality parts are the same price really when you go 306 or 347 crank,rods,pistons...same price. Now if you use stock parts and just to machine your old parts and get new hardware the savings are minimal. And you are still using stock parts...I went with the 347 really the only other cost in building the 347 is notching the block but then again if your pinching pennies you can do that your self. I dont know as for me I got the cubes. and as far as reliabilty, well we can toss it either way ,earlier 347 did burn oil after a couple thousand miles but with proper rings that is a thing of the past. As for tuning its a N/A combo it cant be harder to tune than a blower.

As for me 347 with T/W heads -Trick Flow R intake. Comp cam.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
May 3, 2006
#24
  • May 3, 2006
  • #24
Several things I see in this thread

For me ... I say NO to 331 & YES to 347

I just can't buy into the bad rod ratio thing

Someone said a NA 347 would be no harder to tune than a blown combo and to that I'd have to say it would be EASIER to tune

For the original poster who is stock ..............

Choosing a 347 is VERY different than moving to a 347 for someone who has a combo like mine as all the existing stuff is too little

Grady
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
May 3, 2006
#25
  • May 3, 2006
  • #25
There is no argument here, opt for more cubes. There is no difference in cost so why lose out on the extra cubes. The 331 vs. 347 rod ratio driveability myth has been put to bed years ago. You put the same identical parts on the same identical block and the 347 will be a bit better.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
May 3, 2006
#26
  • May 3, 2006
  • #26
95snoozer said:
when they tested the box r with the TW 185s on a low comp 331 it was worth 12 hp going from a 75 to the 90 that the box is suposed to run

I am still tossing around the idea of whether to do the box on my 347. I think i am going to stick with the holley but i would like to try the box out for sh its and giggles

that cams seems small for revving that high, does he have it retarded? the 282 might be a ncie addition too.
Click to expand...


Your right Davis, he was running the 282 but I think he told me he just swapped that for something else too. i'll try and find out what cam he is running and let you know just for comparisons sake.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
81
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
S
ECU help!
  • starkiller1134
  • Aug 16, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
330
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 17, 2025
starkiller1134
S
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
827
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
is my car dead
  • kenzo0315
  • Jun 30, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
1K
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
kenzo0315
Progress Thread BluePrint 347 long block engine swap
  • Sparky714
  • Aug 2, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 7 8 9
Replies
163
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 8, 2026
Sparky714
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?