• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

351 Cleveland Into 302 Fuel Injected

  • Thread starter Thread starter KyleEBK
  • Start date Start date Jan 6, 2014
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Chuckman

GTFO you fat, heavy bastard
15 Year Member
Oct 21, 2005
1,604
1,002
173
st. louis, mo
Jan 11, 2014
#21
  • Jan 11, 2014
  • #21
NIKwoaC said:
Now, companies like Trick Flow have started to make aftermarket C heads... And those are badass.
Click to expand...
There is a reason why all the big race heads (svo/yates/chi) are all cleveland based, the basic canted valve design is just superior to an inline head, but just uber expensive and somewhat hard to find (and you can still build an inline pretty damn fast too). The tfs stuff may finally help solve that problem, but I haven't seen any good reviews/buildups with them yet.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 11, 2014
#22
  • Jan 11, 2014
  • #22
Chuckman said:
There is a reason why all the big race heads (svo/yates/chi) are all cleveland based, the basic canted valve design is just superior to an inline head, but just uber expensive and somewhat hard to find (and you can still build an inline pretty damn fast too). The tfs stuff may finally help solve that problem, but I haven't seen any good reviews/buildups with them yet.
Click to expand...

One of the Mustang mags a while back did a 408 Clevor with all the Trickflow stuff and it made decent power. Nothing earth-shattering, but it was a cool build.

http://www.mustang50magazine.com/techarticles/m5lp_1111_408ci_clevor_part_3_tuning_big_steam_dream/
 

ZombiePopper

New Member
Jan 10, 2014
3
0
2
Jan 11, 2014
#23
  • Jan 11, 2014
  • #23
The ONE reason I can think of for building a clevor....
Cool factor.
Which, really, a LOT if the stuff we do to our cars is for "cool factor".
But, anyway, its an option if someone didn't want/have the cash for aftermarket heads.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Jan 11, 2014
#24
  • Jan 11, 2014
  • #24
ZombiePopper said:
The ONE reason I can think of for building a clevor....
Cool factor.
Which, really, a LOT if the stuff we do to our cars is for "cool factor".
But, anyway, its an option if someone didn't want/have the cash for aftermarket heads.
Click to expand...
If you can get Cleveland heads for $50-$75 a pair, it could be worth it. The last Ebay auction I saw, the heads started at $250 or so. That makes it much less attractive.

Do check out http://www.pricemotorsport.com/ if you have any interest at all in Cleveland engines. They have adapter plates to mate an EFI intake manifold to Cleveland heads or Cleveland heads and block.

The heads will need to have hardened valve seats installed to be used with unleaded fuel. That adds $275-$400 to the cost. Then you need adapters to mate your EFI manifold to the Cleveland heads - see http://www.pricemotorsport.com/ for the adapters. The 2V adapters are $255, the 4v adapters are $267. If you use the 4V heads, you need a set of port stuffers to reduce the port volume in increase the flow velocity - that adds $112 plus maybe $150 worth of machine work to install the stuffers. Then you need to modify the heads and block to make the water passages line up. New push rods and gaskets are needed too.

Totals: ( I’m sure that I have missed some things)
2 V Heads
$75 heads
$350 machine work
$225 manifold adapters
$650
If you paid $350 for the heads, that works out to $1000, and a good set of used Trick Flows or AFRs could be had for that price

4V heads
$75 heads
$350 machine work valve seats
$267 manifold adapters
$112 port stuffers
$150 port stuffer machine work
$924
If you paid $350 for the heads, that works out to $1274, which is close to the price range for a new set of AFR's


If you have to change the pistons, this isn't a bargain. If you can run the 2V heads and stock pistons (don't know if this is possible), it could be a cheap upgrade.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 11, 2014
#25
  • Jan 11, 2014
  • #25
jrichker said:
If you can get Cleveland heads for $50-$75 a pair, it could be worth it. The last Ebay auction I saw, the heads started at $250 or so. That makes it much less attractive.

Do check out http://www.pricemotorsport.com/ if you have any interest at all in Cleveland engines. They have adapter plates to mate an EFI intake manifold to Cleveland heads or Cleveland heads and block.

The heads will need to have hardened valve seats installed to be used with unleaded fuel. That adds $275-$400 to the cost. Then you need adapters to mate your EFI manifold to the Cleveland heads - see http://www.pricemotorsport.com/ for the adapters. The 2V adapters are $255, the 4v adapters are $267. If you use the 4V heads, you need a set of port stuffers to reduce the port volume in increase the flow velocity - that adds $112 plus maybe $150 worth of machine work to install the stuffers. Then you need to modify the heads and block to make the water passages line up. New push rods and gaskets are needed too.

Totals: ( I’m sure that I have missed some things)
2 V Heads
$75 heads
$350 machine work
$225 manifold adapters
$650
If you paid $350 for the heads, that works out to $1000, and a good set of used Trick Flows or AFRs could be had for that price

4V heads
$75 heads
$350 machine work valve seats
$267 manifold adapters
$112 port stuffers
$150 port stuffer machine work
$924
If you paid $350 for the heads, that works out to $1274, which is close to the price range for a new set of AFR's


If you have to change the pistons, this isn't a bargain. If you can run the 2V heads and stock pistons (don't know if this is possible), it could be a cheap upgrade.
Click to expand...

thats one of the problems with the clevor, you do have to change pistons to a cleveland style piston, and they are a bit more expensive than windsor style pistons. in the end aftermarket windsor heads are the better way to go as you dont need all the adapters and machine work done.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Jan 11, 2014
#26
  • Jan 11, 2014
  • #26
I think the Trick Flow heads outflow all of the Cleveland heads by a lot. The Cleveland heads are the 2v, 4v and 8v heads. The 8v heads flow really well, but were only sold in Australia. A good set of those costs thousands.

Kurt
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jan 12, 2014
#27
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #27
Flow numbers don't tell the whole story. Cleveland heads are a better design. Look at yates stuff. Most of the windsor stuff, with the exception of high ports, begin to stall after .600 lift and are useless without a ton of port work. They work fine on your run of the mill street 331 or 347 but when you get into bigger camshafts the heads will really bottleneck things. Like others said, the canted valves are the key. If windsor heads were that great NASCAR would have been building windsor based motors instead of C3 and D3 stuff.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 12, 2014
#28
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #28
90lxcoupe said:
Flow numbers don't tell the whole story. Cleveland heads are a better design. Look at yates stuff. Most of the windsor stuff, with the exception of high ports, begin to stall after .600 lift and are useless without a ton of port work. They work fine on your run of the mill street 331 or 347 but when you get into bigger camshafts the heads will really bottleneck things. Like others said, the canted valves are the key. If windsor heads were that great NASCAR would have been building windsor based motors instead of C3 and D3 stuff.
Click to expand...

and if you are building a high rpm race engine, then i would say go with the yates head as it is in fact the best head for that kind of racing. but for a street engine, or for engines that are not going to be turning 9500rpm for four hours, the windsor heads are the better way to go.
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Jan 12, 2014
#29
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #29
My father-n-laws 4V heads, which are going on his 408 Clevor, flow 361/270 at .700. They are extensively modified, but he picked them up bare from the machine shop for $500.

Joe
 
Reactions: 88LX5.Oh

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 12, 2014
#30
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #30
RangerJoe said:
My father-n-laws 4V heads, which are going on his 408 Clevor, flow 361/270 at .700. They are extensively modified, but he picked them up bare from the machine shop for $500.

Joe
Click to expand...

there is no question that the cleveland heads can flow a massive amount of air, the 4V heads especially, in fact ford was going to put those heads on the 400 until the government started tightening the emission laws. but remember that the 4V head was designed for high rpm flow, and they just dont work that well at low speeds, unless you reduce the size of the ports.
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Jan 12, 2014
#31
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #31
rbohm said:
there is no question that the cleveland heads can flow a massive amount of air, the 4V heads especially, in fact ford was going to put those heads on the 400 until the government started tightening the emission laws. but remember that the 4V head was designed for high rpm flow, and they just dont work that well at low speeds, unless you reduce the size of the ports.
Click to expand...

Lol. Yeah, I think he is planning on 7500 rpms. Race motor only, 13:1 compression and 110 octane.

Joe
 

ZombiePopper

New Member
Jan 10, 2014
3
0
2
Jan 12, 2014
#32
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #32
Agreed,
If you buy JUST the Cleveland heads, it could be more expensive than aftermarket heads.
But they way to do it is; buy an old vehicle with a 351c in it, part the car and scrap the rest and you'd have made money PLUS you'd have the 351c heads to boot.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Jan 12, 2014
#33
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #33
If you have C heads with a C engine, why not just use the whole C engine? Why bother putting them on a Windsor? Bottom line is that they are iron heads, and they aren't cheap. That's why you are better off with aftermarket aluminum heads.

Kurt
 
Reactions: A5literMan

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jan 12, 2014
#34
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #34
rbohm said:
and if you are building a high rpm race engine, then i would say go with the yates head as it is in fact the best head for that kind of racing. but for a street engine, or for engines that are not going to be turning 9500rpm for four hours, the windsor heads are the better way to go.
Click to expand...

Thats not true. With the right camshaft and valvetrain you can build a very streetable yates combination that makes peak power right around 7500 rpms.
 
Reactions: 88LX5.Oh, A5literMan and srtthis

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Jan 13, 2014
#35
  • Jan 13, 2014
  • #35
You guys know they do make an aluminum canted valve Cleveland head now. Flows like crazy, and honestly a lot cheaper than trying to track down a set of 4v heads.

Kurt
 
Reactions: A5literMan

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Jan 13, 2014
#36
  • Jan 13, 2014
  • #36
90lxcoupe said:
Thats not true. With the right camshaft and valvetrain you can build a very streetable yates combination that makes peak power right around 7500 rpms.
Click to expand...


yup we spin the nitrous car to 8800 but we are few and far between. a different cam would make bring the RPM window way back!
most guys are shifting 7800-8000.

that motor with a streetable all motor cam would make killer power!
 
Reactions: 84Ttop, A5literMan and 90lxcoupe

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Jan 13, 2014
#37
  • Jan 13, 2014
  • #37
^^ Exactly what he said!
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Jan 13, 2014
#38
  • Jan 13, 2014
  • #38
Chuckman said:
There is a reason why all the big race heads (svo/yates/chi) are all cleveland based, the basic canted valve design is just superior to an inline head, but just uber expensive and somewhat hard to find (and you can still build an inline pretty damn fast too). The tfs stuff may finally help solve that problem, but I haven't seen any good reviews/buildups with them yet.
Click to expand...
Haven't seen any higher hp build ups with the TFS stuff yet? I've been able to make 1327 rwhp with the 225 R head and that's with the factory cnc ports untouched. Changes over this winter should yield results in the 1500 rwhp range.
 
Reactions: 88LX5.Oh, srtthis and A5literMan

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Jan 13, 2014
#39
  • Jan 13, 2014
  • #39
84Ttop said:
Haven't seen any higher hp build ups with the TFS stuff yet? I've been able to make 1327 rwhp with the 225 R head and that's with the factory cnc ports untouched. Changes over this winter should yield results in the 1500 rwhp range.
Click to expand...
based on the MPH and weight we are roughly in the same HP range as your expecting
 

Chuckman

GTFO you fat, heavy bastard
15 Year Member
Oct 21, 2005
1,604
1,002
173
st. louis, mo
Jan 13, 2014
#40
  • Jan 13, 2014
  • #40
84Ttop said:
Haven't seen any higher hp build ups with the TFS stuff yet? I've been able to make 1327 rwhp with the 225 R head and that's with the factory cnc ports untouched. Changes over this winter should yield results in the 1500 rwhp range.
Click to expand...
The r head is still a wedge (windsor) head, tfs came out with cleveland heads a couple years ago (powerports). Theyre not nearly as well documented as the wedge stuff yet
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
665
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
926
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
351 Cleveland swapped MII
  • 78 Mach1
  • Jul 31, 2023
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 16 17 18
Replies
346
Views
36K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Sep 28, 2024
78 Mach1
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
949
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?