• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

351 Cleveland Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter cobracobra50
  • Start date Start date Sep 7, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
C

cobracobra50

New Member
Aug 11, 2007
5
0
0
Sep 7, 2007
#1
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #1
Hi , I got a question that so far I haven't been able to get a straight answer to.
How to identify which 351C meaning ( Code, Q,K, so on ). I am bit stumped as
from the history of the engine that I'm aware of it supposed to be 351C "K" code
that came out of a 1972 Mach 1. The engine currently has a 4b holley carb from what I can tell some modification of 600 series ( 80457 ).
According to Ford there was no 351C in a mustang aside from a 1970 and that was a 2b version. also according to them the 4b only came in 1970 to 72 Torino and ( Full size ), I assume Fairlane ?
I don't trust Ford much as according to them I also drive 1995 5.0L Cobra that they never admitted to building till year 2000.
Also according to what I've been reading on the net there is apparently no "K" code 351C, and "K" is only referenced to 289 hi po's ??

The Engine is currently being ran in a 1980 Bronco that I have been progressively working on everything is running and in good shape aside from the right side exaust manifold that recently cracked. On that i would like to ask if anyone knows if any other manifold ( Different model or year , motor ) that a manifold would cross.
So far unable to find one. I had used a 351m oil pan and sump that i had to flip around to accommodate the engine into the truck frame so perhaps the manifold would cross too ?

Any info is appreciated.
Thanks.
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Sep 7, 2007
#2
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #2
Man whoever you've been talking to at Ford doesn't know their a$$hole from their elbow!

The 351C was used in Mustangs 70-73 and other cars until 1974. There is no 'K-code HiPo 351C' but there is the BOSS 351 and 351CJ as well as a regular 4V 351C, all available in mustangs with a bunch of engine codes like Q, M, & R to go along with them.

A 351M is heavily based on a 351C, but I kinda doubt the exhaust manifolds would fit as the biggest change was the 351M heads. Why not headers?
HTH
--Kyle
PS: WTF? They don't admit to building a 5.0L 95 Cobra? WTF??
 
C

cobracobra50

New Member
Aug 11, 2007
5
0
0
Sep 7, 2007
#3
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #3
Back in around 98 i needed some parts for the Cobra, so I go to Ford and Just in case though most parts are inter-changeable with GT asked for whatever I needed
as a 5.0 95 cobra part, the guy looked at me like I was an idiot and said " There is no such thing ", so i drag him out in the parking lot and stuff his face in to the car and under the hood, he still wasn't convinced thinking I Chewed 5.0 Cobra into the top of the intake plenum. Had to insure it as a GT till 2000 as the insurance company didn't even have a listing.
Almost knocked few guys out for implying that I stuck Cobra decals all over the Gt, cause the 95 has the regular Gt hood .

As far as the headers for the Cleveland that would be my next choice however because it's in the Bronco now, no one knows if they would clear everything, another thing is that i can't find any shorties and the full size headers might run into the bottom cross member or not clear firewall or something I don't really know, would be nice to hear from some one who's done this already.

Thanks.
 

geostang351

Member
Mar 30, 2005
946
0
17
Danb., CT
Sep 7, 2007
#4
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #4
You would get a lot more responses if you put this in the Tech section.
 
G

Gud T.B. Blown

Member
Dec 9, 2004
583
1
18
Sep 7, 2007
#5
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #5
First you need to determine whether you have 2v, 4v, 400 or 351M heads. If they are 2v or 4v heads there will be either a 2 or 4 where #2 is. 400 and 351M heads don't.



If you have 2v heads any 2v, 4v, 400 or 351M exhaust manifold will work. If they are 4v heads only a 4v manifold will work.
 

StangDreamin'

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
583
0
16
2nd Ocotillo bush east of the Colorado River; Sout
Sep 8, 2007
#6
  • Sep 8, 2007
  • #6
cobracobra50 said:
Back in around 98 i needed some parts for the Cobra, so I go to Ford and Just in case though most parts are inter-changeable with GT asked for whatever I needed
as a 5.0 95 cobra part, the guy looked at me like I was an idiot and said " There is no such thing ", so i drag him out in the parking lot and stuff his face in to the car and under the hood, he still wasn't convinced thinking I Chewed 5.0 Cobra into the top of the intake plenum...
Click to expand...

Are you Shiite-ing us??? Did this guy really work at a Ford Parts Desk; or was he just covering for the regular Parts Guy's Lunch Break before he went back to the Nissan side of the dealership?
Wonder what he had said if you had called it a '94 Cobra? And maybe showed him SVTCobra306's article in the April '07 "Mustang Enthusiast" mag? For "the regulars" on this Forum that haven't seen the mag or heard about it; the car in question can be seen "underneath" Cowgirl Tink in her avatar picture.

OBTW: That's my daughter, you pervs! Look at the white Cobra-shape thing; not down her blouse!

This "parts guy" must have just stopped by the dealership because his Vespa broke down outside......
 
G

Grabber70Mach

Member
Jul 6, 2003
305
0
17
Indian Head, MD
Sep 8, 2007
#7
  • Sep 8, 2007
  • #7
cobracobra50 said:
Back in around 98 i needed some parts for the Cobra, so I go to Ford and Just in case though most parts are inter-changeable with GT asked for whatever I needed
as a 5.0 95 cobra part, the guy looked at me like I was an idiot and said " There is no such thing ", so i drag him out in the parking lot and stuff his face in to the car and under the hood, he still wasn't convinced thinking I Chewed 5.0 Cobra into the top of the intake plenum. Had to insure it as a GT till 2000 as the insurance company didn't even have a listing.
Almost knocked few guys out for implying that I stuck Cobra decals all over the Gt, cause the 95 has the regular Gt hood .

As far as the headers for the Cleveland that would be my next choice however because it's in the Bronco now, no one knows if they would clear everything, another thing is that i can't find any shorties and the full size headers might run into the bottom cross member or not clear firewall or something I don't really know, would be nice to hear from some one who's done this already.

Thanks.
Click to expand...


If its a Cleveland motor check out Sanderson headers for shorties, I've got them on my 70 4V Motor.

Here's a link
http://www.sandersonheaders.com/product_info.php?products_id=188
 
C

cobracobra50

New Member
Aug 11, 2007
5
0
0
Sep 8, 2007
#8
  • Sep 8, 2007
  • #8
Lol the sad part was that he worked there for years, still does.

Now about that manifold, I got little pissy and went and got me a 351m/400
manifold.... so here is the catch, it would bolt up ,the patern is same even the gasket part numbers match to 351C however it is a beefier manifold and the out is angled more to the outside so due to clearance issues it's a no go.. from what I can tell I don't think it would work in the mustang body either.
The real Cleveland manifold basicaly hugs the head and goes straight back and down I assume it was made that way because of the Original Intended application,and it's clearance requirements.


Cool.... Sanderson headers, looks like they may work... OR so I hope.. lol.
If nothing else i guess it's a learning process.

Another thing if anybody happens to have any 351C related info filed , like Pdf. books or anything like manuals and so on could you guys maybe toss it to my e-mail Cobracobra50@hotmail.com , would be much appreciated I want to get up to par with this one.

The story is I got the motor from one old guy who used to work for Ford back in a day and who was restoring a 72 Q code Mach1, he ended up building the motor I got first, before finding a Q code one that matched the cars original numbers. So I got it but before I got Into working with this thing the old man passed away and I litteraly have no one to talk to in reference to it.

Thank you all for your help.
 
G

Grabber70Mach

Member
Jul 6, 2003
305
0
17
Indian Head, MD
Sep 8, 2007
#9
  • Sep 8, 2007
  • #9
Try checking out this site.

http://www.network54.com/Forum/119419/
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Sep 8, 2007
#10
  • Sep 8, 2007
  • #10
check out the 335 series (351c, 351m and 400) engine forum on network54.com, lot's of excellent info there. here's a link


http://www.network54.com/Forum/119419/
 
E

Edgarraybrownjr

New Member
Feb 25, 2022
2
0
1
Oakridge
Feb 25, 2022
#11
  • Feb 25, 2022
  • #11
cobracobra50 said:
Hi , I got a question that so far I haven't been able to get a straight answer to.
How to identify which 351C meaning ( Code, Q,K, so on ). I am bit stumped as
from the history of the engine that I'm aware of it supposed to be 351C "K" code
that came out of a 1972 Mach 1. The engine currently has a 4b holley carb from what I can tell some modification of 600 series ( 80457 ).
According to Ford there was no 351C in a mustang aside from a 1970 and that was a 2b version. also according to them the 4b only came in 1970 to 72 Torino and ( Full size ), I assume Fairlane ?
I don't trust Ford much as according to them I also drive 1995 5.0L Cobra that they never admitted to building till year 2000.
Also according to what I've been reading on the net there is apparently no "K" code 351C, and "K" is only referenced to 289 hi po's ??

The Engine is currently being ran in a 1980 Bronco that I have been progressively working on everything is running and in good shape aside from the right side exaust manifold that recently cracked. On that i would like to ask if anyone knows if any other manifold ( Different model or year , motor ) that a manifold would cross.
So far unable to find one. I had used a 351m oil pan and sump that i had to flip around to accommodate the engine into the truck frame so perhaps the manifold would cross too ?

Any info is appreciated.
Thanks.
Click to expand...

They do exist cause I have 2 of them.. only 80 produced that I know of.

5.0ina66 said:
Man whoever you've been talking to at Ford doesn't know their a$$hole from their elbow!

The 351C was used in Mustangs 70-73 and other cars until 1974. There is no 'K-code HiPo 351C' but there is the BOSS 351 and 351CJ as well as a regular 4V 351C, all available in mustangs with a bunch of engine codes like Q, M, & R to go along with them.

A 351M is heavily based on a 351C, but I kinda doubt the exhaust manifolds would fit as the biggest change was the 351M heads. Why not headers?
HTH
--Kyle
PS: WTF? They don't admit to building a 5.0L 95 Cobra? WTF??
Click to expand...

Here is one of my K code 1972 351 Cleveland ...
 

Attachments

  • 20220220_133132.webp
    500.2 KB · Views: 138
  • 20220220_133128.webp
    465.1 KB · Views: 160
  • 20220220_133036.webp
    799.7 KB · Views: 147

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Feb 25, 2022
#12
  • Feb 25, 2022
  • #12
You are aware this thread is 15 years old?
 
E

Edgarraybrownjr

New Member
Feb 25, 2022
2
0
1
Oakridge
Feb 25, 2022
#13
  • Feb 25, 2022
  • #13
wicked93gs said:
You are aware this thread is 15 years old?
Click to expand...
Yeah the motor has been around for 50 years
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Feb 25, 2022
#14
  • Feb 25, 2022
  • #14
All good, at least it gives a google search result for the question.

My point was simply by the "new member" tag still under the OPs name its very doubtful he will ever check this thread again to see your answer.
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,802
903
143
Mar 10, 2022
#15
  • Mar 10, 2022
  • #15
Edgarraybrownjr said:
They do exist cause I have 2 of them.. only 80 produced that I know of.
Click to expand...
Actually Edgar, the engine code being referred to is the 5th digit in the VIN. In a 72 Mustang, no such thing as a "K" code in the VIN. The "K" in your pics is an engineering number for that particular part.

F302-2V
H351-2V
L250-1V
Q351-4V
R351-4V HO

These are the choices for 1972
 
Reactions: manicmechanic007

manicmechanic007

5 Year Member
Sep 26, 2017
2,526
712
143
Roy, Utah
Mar 31, 2022
#16
  • Mar 31, 2022
  • #16
15 years old or not we all still learn
I can add that you need a book like this for your 73
They make them reproduction
I post in the older section and have this pic for a 66 that shows what you need
 

manicmechanic007

5 Year Member
Sep 26, 2017
2,526
712
143
Roy, Utah
Mar 31, 2022
#17
  • Mar 31, 2022
  • #17
 

manicmechanic007

5 Year Member
Sep 26, 2017
2,526
712
143
Roy, Utah
Mar 31, 2022
#18
  • Mar 31, 2022
  • #18
 

manicmechanic007

5 Year Member
Sep 26, 2017
2,526
712
143
Roy, Utah
Mar 31, 2022
#19
  • Mar 31, 2022
  • #19
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,802
903
143
Mar 31, 2022
#20
  • Mar 31, 2022
  • #20
Don't need a book, all that info is online. Some good decoders out there.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
58
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
T
New here, just saying hi.
  • Tank Mechanic
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
156
The Welcome Wagon Nov 2, 2025
nickyb
G
Intro and FB questions
  • gflat65
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
193
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 25, 2025
horse sence
A
need help and advise
  • amps1956
  • Oct 14, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
16
Views
550
Other Auto Tech Oct 21, 2025
Mcmahst
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
150
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?