• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351 heads ?'s

  • Thread starter Thread starter Z06killinSBF
  • Start date Start date Feb 24, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Feb 24, 2008
#1
  • Feb 24, 2008
  • #1
How good are the 69 351 2v heads? Are they better than ported E7's? What would my compression be on a 289? What are the combustion chamber size on them?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 24, 2008
#2
  • Feb 24, 2008
  • #2
The 69 Windsor heads are the same for both 2 bbl and 4 bbl. Chambers are listed as 58-60 ccs, the C6OE 289 heads are 54 ccs. E7 chambers are 64 ccs. 2-4 ccs on a 289 yeilds about a quarter to half point decrease in compression. You can always mill the heads to negate that.
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Feb 24, 2008
#3
  • Feb 24, 2008
  • #3
Are the 69 heads worth building up?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 24, 2008
#4
  • Feb 24, 2008
  • #4
Depends on what shape they're in now and what use you're going to put them to.
 
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Feb 24, 2008
#5
  • Feb 24, 2008
  • #5
What's the attraction to the E7 heads? Is it availability? I've read about a lot of people using them but never did know why they chose that specific head over others.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Feb 25, 2008
#6
  • Feb 25, 2008
  • #6
If you port both heads you can get more out of the 69/70 351w heads. The E7TE heads are all over the place. You can get them off of a bunch of different motors and they make a decent amount of power if you port them well.
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Feb 25, 2008
#7
  • Feb 25, 2008
  • #7
The 351 head are in a rebuilt, stock shape. I can get them off my friend for probably nothing.

The reason I have E7's is that for the $50 I paid for them, I got screw in studs, FMS roller rockers, Comp springs, 3-angle valve job, bowl blended, port matched, etc....

My question is, if I get the 351 heads is it a benefit to make the swap? Or should I save for the next few years and get some AFR 185's. The heads are going on a not mild but now wild 289.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 25, 2008
#8
  • Feb 25, 2008
  • #8
If the E7's have all that done already, keep em. E7's are better to start with over all the earlier run of the mill stock heads plus Ford used em on all the Mustang , pickups and van 5.0's from 87-97. Plus a few other applications. The only help they really need is opening the exhaust ports and bowl blending to make a good budget head. Anything more in porting and valve upgrades, you're better off buying aftermarket heads.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Feb 25, 2008
#9
  • Feb 25, 2008
  • #9
I agree, since the heads are already worked and setup to go just use them. The 351w heads are going to need $$ to make them out perform and the money might be better spent elsewhere.
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Feb 25, 2008
#10
  • Feb 25, 2008
  • #10
Ok, so I'll just keep the E7's. Do ya'll think a cam change would gain much. I know my cam isnt much, just an old Isky 262 Supercam: .445/.445 lift 208/208 @ .050 108 LSA. What kinda cam would be a good upgrade?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 25, 2008
#11
  • Feb 25, 2008
  • #11
First find out what springs are oin those E7's, then decide on how wild you want to go. You've got an "RV" type cam now. Good for bottom end to midrange and mileage.
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Feb 25, 2008
#12
  • Feb 25, 2008
  • #12
If I remember correctly, my friend said they were the Comp's step up from the stock springs. Probably good for about .520 lift.
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Feb 26, 2008
#13
  • Feb 26, 2008
  • #13
the 270 magnum works pretty well for combos like yours . . .

one of the few flat tappet experiences I have.

I am sure there are other selections out there.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 26, 2008
#14
  • Feb 26, 2008
  • #14
the e7's on your 289 will probably yield 8:1 or less compression so plan on having them milled....a lot

if you put them on without milling them you'd be better off using the stock 69 351 heads because all the gain you'd get from the porting will be lost on the compression if not more.

if you're good with a die grinder you can probably do a hom port job on the 351 heads and get about the same power as the e7 heads after having them milled, then just swap all the goodies from the e7's to the 351 heads.

i think at thi point it's a wash as to which heads would be best for your 289....either are going to need plenty of work, less with the e7's but you're going to run the risk of valvetrain geometry problems and the e7's will have to so much material taken off of them to get the compression back up that you'll likely have overheating issues with them down the road.
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Feb 26, 2008
#15
  • Feb 26, 2008
  • #15
Are the 289 heads better than the 351's?
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Feb 26, 2008
#16
  • Feb 26, 2008
  • #16
Not a chance.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 26, 2008
#17
  • Feb 26, 2008
  • #17
Rusty67 said:
Not a chance.
Click to expand...

right, small valves and tiny ports
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Feb 26, 2008
#18
  • Feb 26, 2008
  • #18
Noted, thanks everyone.

So basically keep what I have and save $$ to get some after market heads?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 26, 2008
#19
  • Feb 26, 2008
  • #19
note necessarily, just warning of the potential pifalls involved with either one. even the stock 351 heads will probably be a nice improvement over the stock 289 heads with little or no work involved but the E7's aren't going to be a perfect bolt on either.
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Feb 26, 2008
#20
  • Feb 26, 2008
  • #20
bnickel said:
note necessarily, just warning of the potential pifalls involved with either one. even the stock 351 heads will probably be a nice improvement over the stock 289 heads with little or no work involved but the E7's aren't going to be a perfect bolt on either.
Click to expand...
I already have the E7's on the car. I runs really strong but hits a wall at 5500 rpm. Did some talking with the old man and decided that the factory style heads are holding me back. I know I dont have a monster cam but I dont wont to make my car a dog by putting a big cam in it. I suspect the motor is making about 8.5-9.0:1 comp. No one has given me a solid answer yet.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
256
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
920
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Cooling Jacket Pitting Idea's?
  • BoostedRed89gt
  • Aug 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
264
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 17, 2026
Mustang5L5
1973 Headers
  • Stang_1973
  • Mar 11, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
166
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 1, 2025
Noobz347
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
527
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?