• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

351 windsor build

  • Thread starter Thread starter 351cougar69
  • Start date Start date Oct 11, 2018
3

351cougar69

New Member
Oct 11, 2018
3
0
1
california
Oct 11, 2018
#1
  • Oct 11, 2018
  • #1
alright guys so i am new to the whole thread thing, i am building a 351 windsor and i need help so i figured id ask on here and see what everyone else thinks/ can help with. i have a 1969 mercury cougar with a 351 windsor, i already yanked the motor out and after closer inspection it is actually a 351 from a 79 galaxie so im already a little distraught as to how this will affect my build....area there any differences between the 69 and 79 block? i am going after power and torque like any reasonable man would and want to know where my build should begin... if you guys have any questions ask away
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Oct 11, 2018
#2
  • Oct 11, 2018
  • #2
Nothing wrong with 79 block, I believe 69 has slightly shorter deck height and 2 piece rear main were 79 may be 1 piece.
You need to decide what kind of power you want to make/what your goals are for the car, block should handle upwards of 600hp.
Both blocks would be non roller but can easily run a roller cam with the correct link bar roller lifters.
May even want to think about building a stroker 393/408 etc. for more power.
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,764
6,929
214
SW Houston
Oct 11, 2018
#3
  • Oct 11, 2018
  • #3
Build should begin at power goals. A well built 351 based motor can make a lot of power.
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,519
194
Maryland
Oct 11, 2018
#4
  • Oct 11, 2018
  • #4
Whatever you do, professionally balance the entire rotating assembly components.. Crank, rods, pistons, flywheel, harmonic. Everything. This way it will make more power to the wheel and take more abuse without coming apart. A properly balanced engine will have minimal vibration and parts wont be beating each other up.
 
Reactions: krazedstang

nelzfoxes

5 Year Member
Aug 20, 2013
472
325
94
Oct 28, 2018
#5
  • Oct 28, 2018
  • #5
I swapped a 302 into my station wagon and then swapped out the 302 for a 351w. I used ford fuel injection from the start and stuck with the stock mustang roller camshaft. The power is good not great but the torque difference is pure street car gold. It pulls down low where you drive a street car most of the time. How did you like the 351 that was in the cougar? Since it wasn’t original anyway get an f4te roller cam block so you can run any cam made for the 87-93 mustang top it off with aluminum heads and run a power adder.
 
3

351cougar69

New Member
Oct 11, 2018
3
0
1
california
Nov 15, 2018
#6
  • Nov 15, 2018
  • #6
thank you all for your replies, so i plan to make around 450 hp on the block itself and want to push around 650 to 700 down the line with a supercharger. now my next question, i originally thought my engine was a 393 stroker because of the piston stroke i had originally measured from inside the dish to the top of the block however now after measuring from top of the piston itself to the deck is actually a 3.5 instead of a 3.85 stroke... my question is, if i ordered a 393 stroker with a 3.85 stroke would this cause the piston to stick beyond the deck?? current specs are 4.030 bore, 3.55 stroke, 3.00 inch main journal, 6.200 inch rod length.. what do you guys think?
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Nov 15, 2018
#7
  • Nov 15, 2018
  • #7
If you're measuring stroke it would be the same regardless of where you measured it from, whether you measured from the top of the piston, or inside of the dish, at the bottom of the bore it'll be the same. ( as long as you're taking the domes depth at TDC into account.) A 3.5" stroke up against a 4" bore is gonna net you 351 c.i. Even Taking into account the over bore, the engine will only be slightly bigger, certainly not 393 inches.

If you decide to stroke the engine, the piston changes everything. A longer stroke requires that the pin location in the piston is moved higher to allow the extra stroke w/o pushing the piston out of the hole.

And, a 408 is a better choice in strikers than a 393. It's a better rod angle ratio combination, will not cost that much more, and will be better for power in the long run because of it.
 
Last edited: Nov 15, 2018

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,519
194
Maryland
Nov 15, 2018
#8
  • Nov 15, 2018
  • #8
If you get a longer stroke crank, it needs to be matched with compatible pistons. The pistons are shorter to accommodate the longer stroke.

https://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2003/09/stroker/
 
3

351cougar69

New Member
Oct 11, 2018
3
0
1
california
Nov 16, 2018
#9
  • Nov 16, 2018
  • #9
CarMichael Angelo said:
If you're measuring stroke it would be the same regardless of where you measured it from, whether you measured from the top of the piston, or inside of the dish, at the bottom of the bore it'll be the same. ( as long as you're taking the domes depth at TDC into account.) A 3.5" stroke up against a 4" bore is gonna net you 351 c.i. Even Taking into account the over bore, the engine will only be slightly bigger, certainly not 393 inches.

If you decide to stroke the engine, the piston changes everything. A longer stroke requires that the pin location in the piston is moved higher to allow the extra stroke w/o pushing the piston out of the hole.

And, a 408 is a better choice in strikers than a 393. It's a better rod angle ratio combination, will not cost that much more, and will be better for power in the long run because of it.
Click to expand...

Thank you for this explanation that makes alot of sense ok, also I did see what you mean about the 408 stroker kit being the same cost wise and just includes a longer stroke, so my next question would then pertain to valve reliefs, 1 how do I know if I need them, should I get them, and how could I still get around 9.5:1 compression... I apologize for all the questions btw this is the first engine I build ever, I'm taking notes from a teacher of mine in college who built motors in his you ger years and combining that with knowledge here and on Google to put together my engine lol. Anywho I want to run possibly afr 205 on this build as I've read amazing things from them and have a mild edelbrock cam, I could replace it if necessary however I had planned to keep it; it has a 224 int lift and 234 exh lift duration at 0.50 inch
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Nov 16, 2018
#10
  • Nov 16, 2018
  • #10
https://www.rbracing-rsr.com/compstaticcalc.html
Use the above calculator.
I would imagine those cam specs you listed are duration not lift ?
If that is lift you will definitely need a bigger cam.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Nov 16, 2018
#11
  • Nov 16, 2018
  • #11
A 408, with 205 heads will be cheated out of a lot of power if you choose the wrong cam. That is something ALWAYS best left up to the experts. When the time comes for you to choose a cam, and you know everything else about the combination
(I.e. The cars weight, transmission, gear ratio, your intended use, type induction,) then you call dude at XYZ cam grinder, and they'll tell you what's best.

the head you choose will come in different chamber sizes to allow you a lower CR if you so desire, and 9.5:1 is a good target for a pump premium engine. You'll also have to have a pretty significant dish in the piston when going to an engine as big as a 408.

Do you homework, prepare to spend a bunch of money, and don't set a goal that seems too lofty.
( like any big stroker combination will seem) by the time you're fully into a 408 with AFR heads, and all the bolt ons, you'll be in the $7,000.00 range. And if you aren't being honest with yourself, 7 k may as well be 70k.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Nov 16, 2018
#12
  • Nov 16, 2018
  • #12
The above about letting the experts help with the cam selection is true, I let Brian Freezy design my cam for a 306ci engine with a eaton m112 blower on top of it. told him what i wanted out of the combo and he ground me a 224i 236e at .050 duration .57x lift on both cut at a 114* lsa..... a big cam for a 306, the car drives like its stock sounds real nice at idle and rips when the boost comes in.... let an expert set you up, you wont be disappointed.
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Nov 17, 2018
#13
  • Nov 17, 2018
  • #13
For a 393 stroker...the correct pistons would be 302 pistons....correct ?

That was the budget stroker for years...393 crank + 302 pistons with .030 bore. Essentially, only needing a crank and some 302 pistons.

With 408 you need specific pistons ( I thought ).
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Nov 18, 2018
#14
  • Nov 18, 2018
  • #14
90sickfox said:
For a 393 stroker...the correct pistons would be 302 pistons....correct ?

That was the budget stroker for years...393 crank + 302 pistons with .030 bore. Essentially, only needing a crank and some 302 pistons.

With 408 you need specific pistons ( I thought ).
Click to expand...
Correct
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Nov 18, 2018
#15
  • Nov 18, 2018
  • #15
90sickfox said:
For a 393 stroker...the correct pistons would be 302 pistons....correct ?

That was the budget stroker for years...393 crank + 302 pistons with .030 bore. Essentially, only needing a crank and some 302 pistons.

With 408 you need specific pistons ( I thought ).
Click to expand...
That may have been the case back in the day, but now days, a 351 w block, and 1000.00 gets you 408-416 c.i.

Crank, rods, pistons, ( hyperucraptic ) pins, bearings, and locks. For somebody that is just looking for a big power, big torque " big block in a small block" pkg, that isn't looking to add a power adder on top of it, this would be perfect.
 
Reactions: General karthief and 90sickfox
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
New Guy from Southeast Missouri
  • tcooke11
  • Jan 10, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
247
The Welcome Wagon Jan 17, 2026
TomcatPC
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
195
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
T
1979 foxbody in tank fuel pump
  • Tgm624
  • Sep 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
511
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 28, 2025
AeroCoupe
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
719
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?