• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

351C or 460?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vega7891
  • Start date Start date Apr 7, 2007

vega7891

New Member
Mar 17, 2007
14
0
0
Riverside,CA
Apr 7, 2007
#1
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #1
hey guys, i just bout a 91 LX hatch, its a 2.3 right now but that comming out. has anyone put a 351C in there fox body? or a 460 ? do you guys know any pages with info on these swaps??
 

vega7891

New Member
Mar 17, 2007
14
0
0
Riverside,CA
Apr 7, 2007
#2
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #2
anybody?
 
J

JamesB88

Member
May 29, 2004
228
0
16
North Kansas City
Apr 7, 2007
#3
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #3
Talk to this guy about putting a 351c in a fox, im sure he could tell you everything about how to do it, he is doing it right now. http://purposebuilt.org/forum/member.php?find=lastposter&t=17239
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Apr 7, 2007
#4
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #4
If I had to choose I'd go with the 460.
 

KurtPB

Member
May 15, 2006
127
0
17
Lorimor, IA
Apr 8, 2007
#5
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #5
wouldnt a 460 make the car extremely unbalanced and cause some major burnage with all the torque?
 
S

smr

Member
Nov 14, 2005
167
0
16
Nor*Cal (Vacaville)
Apr 8, 2007
#6
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #6
i am in the middle of my swap still ..well about 85% doen now jus tmoney hold ing me back..Ill help you answer as much as I can. BTW Im doing a 351C in a 1990 GT...
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Apr 8, 2007
#7
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #7
Cost wise, it's be much cheaper both short and long-term to use a 351W for the swap. Also, parts would be a heck of a lot easier to come by since a Windsor engine is what came in the car as original equipment, so you wouldn't need any special mounts, etc.
 
S

smr

Member
Nov 14, 2005
167
0
16
Nor*Cal (Vacaville)
Apr 9, 2007
#8
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #8
dont listen to them put a Cleveland in it...
 

87Mustang351

Member
Sep 12, 2005
220
1
16
Canada, Nova scotia, Cape Breton
Apr 9, 2007
#9
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #9
go with a windor, i did n love it
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Apr 9, 2007
#10
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #10
stick with a windsor! I started doing a cleveland in my 88 lx but cost and part availability comes into play. The 460 on the other hand is going to add a ton of weight to the front end and its 3000$ for a good set of aluminum heads! Stay with a windsor based motor! cubic inches is not always the answer!
 
S

smr

Member
Nov 14, 2005
167
0
16
Nor*Cal (Vacaville)
Apr 9, 2007
#11
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #11
put a cleveland in it... do what ever you want..I like seeing swaps because its diff...I know alot of guys with windsor combos that are super common and dont run right atleast with a swap you got an excuse jk I would have prob done a windsor based motor but I got a free roller with no drive train and got a built cleveland for 1k and started from there...its been pretty cool so far and if all is well on combo it should be good for low 11s high tens on motor and I am less then 2500k total into motor (including heads/intake/custom cam/lifters/etc...). plus had to learn a bunch of stuff I didnt already know...projects are funner that way to me... but too each his own..if you decide to go cleveland hit me up and Ill help with what ever I can...
 

montegoman351

Member
Jan 12, 2007
169
1
18
Apr 9, 2007
#12
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #12
Windsor b- so it would be easier to fit...with Cleveland heads!!!
Clevor...
Aussie colsed chamber, or CHI heads.
http://www.mustangandfords.com/techarticles/30220_clevor_engine/

That's something I haven't seen in any mustang, maybe there's a reason, I don't know.
 

Woodrow

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
183
0
0
Atlanta/Auburn
Apr 9, 2007
#13
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #13
Put the 460 in to, the weight isnt THAT bad, you dont need aluminum haeds just port a good set of stock ones get a custom cam, put a kit on it and run 9.50's all day while the nay sayers on stangnet are riving in jealousy.
 
S

smr

Member
Nov 14, 2005
167
0
16
Nor*Cal (Vacaville)
Apr 9, 2007
#14
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #14
I know a few guys who run clevors....you can check them out on *******.com and corral has a secton with a bunch of guys with clevor combos..Kasse cleveland headed windsor won engine master for under 408 ci...and clevor have placed in top five in engine masters last three or four years...with over 700hp on pump gas motor...streetable rpms too....crazy strong..check out Mark McKeown
http://mmeracing.com hes gonna be offering up a clevor crate engine...nice...anyway..yeah cleveland swap is more common then alot of peeps think...
 

montegoman351

Member
Jan 12, 2007
169
1
18
Apr 10, 2007
#15
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #15
I have seen a few Cleveland swaps, but not a Clevor swap. 460 would be a good candidate, but I agree with most everybody with the weight issue of the 460. I think a roller block 351W would be my choice, with Cleveland heads .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Drivetrain 6R80 to t56 swap
  • Holymoses
  • Apr 25, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
185
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
869
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
T
New here, just saying hi.
  • Tank Mechanic
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
154
The Welcome Wagon Nov 2, 2025
nickyb
F
Electrical Foxbody wiring harness 2.3 to v8 swap
  • Foxbodyjake
  • Mar 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
603
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 13, 2026
Foxbodyjake
F
D
LT header id
  • djj62478
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
117
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 25, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?