• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351W Block question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 67stangboy
  • Start date Start date Jul 7, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jul 8, 2006
#21
  • Jul 8, 2006
  • #21
most any 351 block will do fine except as noted the 69/70 blocks have a shorter deck height so pistons may be a problem, i'd advise contacting the piston manufacturer to see which block the particular pistons are designed for. for instance the long rod 351w i plan on building the KB pistons i'm going to use are designed for the 71-later blocks and they said that the pistons would stick out of the block if i used a 69/70 block. also the late 70's and early 80's 351 blocks aren't as strong as the earlier or later blocks i believe because they used a higher "gray" iron content.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Jul 9, 2006
#22
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #22
bnickel said:
most any 351 block will do fine except as noted the 69/70 blocks have a shorter deck height so pistons may be a problem, i'd advise contacting the piston manufacturer to see which block the particular pistons are designed for. for instance the long rod 351w i plan on building the KB pistons i'm going to use are designed for the 71-later blocks and they said that the pistons would stick out of the block if i used a 69/70 block. also the late 70's and early 80's 351 blocks aren't as strong as the earlier or later blocks i believe because they used a higher "gray" iron content.
Click to expand...

Irregardless of the metal used, the early (69-74 or so) 351w blocks have much, much thicker main bearing web supports. This is a known fact and it was very apparent when I compared my old 71' block to my 89' block. There was no question structurally as to which is stronger when both are compared.

If one were so inclined, it is possible to drill 4 bolt main caps on the early blocks, the later block has no real meat for it.

In the end, unless you are putting out much over a true 500-550hp, ANY year 351w block will work. You can go higher than that, but you must pay more attention to your tuning. If you want more than 550hp, save your pennies for a Dart block. Also save up for the suspension and drivetrain that such a monster will require.

Trust me when I say that a 500hp street engine is more than a handful for most people and definitely leads to severe cases of the pucker factor. . . .
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Jul 9, 2006
#23
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #23
I have a collection of about a dozen C9 and D1 351W blocks. Without re-hashing what's already been said, these blocks have noticeably beefier main webs than the later D2 and D4 blocks. The next 351W block that had beefy mains was the E3 H.O. truck block used for 3 years. It overlapped production with the E4 truck block, which eventually replaced the E3 as the H.O. block. While it's very likely that D1 production overlapped D2 production, as Ford seems to do some really crazy things with their engine lines, I have only actually seen 69 -71 Fords with either C9 or D1 351W blocks. One big benefit of the C9 or D1 block is that they were cast with bosses to accept 4 bolt mains. Of course no production block ever came with them, but they are easily added. I put splayed caps on mine, although they were designed for vertical bolts. There is enough meat to use a splayed cap, and they pull on the sides of the block to strengthen the bottom end. Quality of machining and assembly will play a key role in how well your engine holds up. A local drag racer who runs mid 9s in a 70 fastback with a 408 stroker hasn't had a problem in two seasons of racing. A local dirt tracker cracked a C9 block last season, and he was only making around 550 hp tops with a stock stroke.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jul 10, 2006
#24
  • Jul 10, 2006
  • #24
my last 2 351w's were both D0OE blocks. they are out there. i currently have a D1OE block and am looking for an F4TE block.
 
7

70MachI

New Member
May 20, 2006
25
0
0
Jul 10, 2006
#25
  • Jul 10, 2006
  • #25
Hmmm... I have noticed a lot of people are saying 500 is the limit of a 351w?

I have sen many many over 500 hp Windsor motors. Infact one of them is mine. I was pushing 600 plus at the rear wheels and have had no problems what so ever. In fact I know someone that had a stock rotateing assemnly but with forged pistons push over 800 but he ended up bending his connecting rods. It seems that the connecting rods are the weak link to the 351s. I think if your goal is 500 you are more than safe with a 351w just make sure you have a good machinist and a good balance with quality fastners and hardware and you should be fine. RPMs it what seems to kill the blocks so build something that makes power to about 6,000.

And about the 302s. The late model years are "thin cast" walls. They are usually only good up to 400-500 wheel hp. If you can find an earlier "Mexican" block they have thicker main caps and that is were a lot of the blocks tend to crack. I have cracked a late model block with and with my estimates was around 400 hp.

Like mentioned above even a TRUE 400 wheel HP car is a handful on the street. I have ridden in many wannabe 400 hp cars and then I let them ride in my acutal 400hp car they can't believe the difference.

Thats just my .02 cents.

Also a good company I have used in the past is Ford Perfomance Solutions. They are very helpful and decent prices. That is were I bought my last short block from and he worked with me cause I wanted a low compression motor with I-beam rods to make close to 800-900 hp. I haven't gone that far up and I don't think I will since I like to keep my engine going! Also we made it so I redline at 7200 with the long rod 357w But I am keeping my revs down to 6000
 

67stangboy

Founding Member
Jan 6, 2002
526
0
17
Granite City
Jul 10, 2006
#26
  • Jul 10, 2006
  • #26
Thanks for the info, I'll be happy with just 500 HP at the fly wheel so a stock block should hold up fine. Now I just need to write up a list of "things to do" to get the suspension and the rearend and tranny ready for the motor. Plus meatier tires in the back.

Once again thanks for the help.

Jason I.
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Jul 10, 2006
#27
  • Jul 10, 2006
  • #27
Just as a side note, I believe the urban Ford legend of the high nickel content may have come about in late 1982 or early 83, when Ford got back into racing and cast a run of 351 Cleveland blocks in Australia for use in Winston Cup racing. This was the fastest way to get back into racing as they didn't release the 351W SVO block until March 1984. I haven't found any literature to back it up, but I recall some advertisement back then or perhaps a magazine article that referred to the new (for 1983) Aussie Cleveland racing blocks as having a high nickel content. These were never meant for production cars, so the extra wear on machining tools would be tolerable.

And for BNickel, I didn't say there is no such thing as a D0OE 351W block, just that I've never run across one in over 15 years of collecting early 351W blocks. I've seen D0OE 351W heads on C9OE blocks, but no D0OE blocks.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jul 10, 2006
#28
  • Jul 10, 2006
  • #28
69gmachine said:
And for BNickel, I didn't say there is no such thing as a D0OE 351W block, just that I've never run across one in over 15 years of collecting early 351W blocks. I've seen D0OE 351W heads on C9OE blocks, but no D0OE blocks.
Click to expand...


i was just saying they are out there.
 

67stangboy

Founding Member
Jan 6, 2002
526
0
17
Granite City
Oct 25, 2007
#29
  • Oct 25, 2007
  • #29
sorry to dig this thread up from the grave, just thought I'd let everyone know I found my engine block, a 1969 351W. Walked in to my local mustang store to pick up my power steering pump bolts and saw it for sale for $150. I'm picking it up tommrow
 
S

sandymachleish

New Member
Oct 22, 2007
9
0
0
Oct 29, 2007
#30
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #30
My uncle also has a 69 351W! I'm thinking he should save it for parts for my 70 Mach 1
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Oct 29, 2007
#31
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #31
i split my '69 351w block in no time.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Oct 29, 2007
#32
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #32
paul302 said:
i split my '69 351w block in no time.
Click to expand...

I hope I have better luck. Was it the block that failed? Or a casuality of another part failing?

From what I've heard, stock 351W blocks are good to around 650HP.
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Oct 30, 2007
#33
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #33
BottleFed70 said:
I hope I have better luck. Was it the block that failed? Or a casuality of another part failing?

From what I've heard, stock 351W blocks are good to around 650HP.
Click to expand...

the block cracked (#2 main to the cam journal). everything else was fine, luckily.
i'm making more than 650hp, so i'm not blaming the block.
 

67stangboy

Founding Member
Jan 6, 2002
526
0
17
Granite City
Oct 30, 2007
#34
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #34
well I said I was picking it up the other day, and that makes me a liar. Went to get the block and to check and see if they would let me get it tested to make sure there weren't any crack in the block. They didn't care but he pointed out two things I had missed in my first look, one of the studs for the heads was broken off in the block and at the top of one of the cylinders there was a piece of block missing about the size of my pinky nail. I passed on the block, I guess I'll just keep searching.
 

67stangboy

Founding Member
Jan 6, 2002
526
0
17
Granite City
Nov 1, 2007
#35
  • Nov 1, 2007
  • #35
One more question, what transmission do you all recommend for a 351w build up?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Nov 2, 2007
#36
  • Nov 2, 2007
  • #36
Use the one you have on hand and/or can afford. There are too many choices to list and argue over. C-4, C-6, FMX, AOD, E4OD, T5, Toploader 4 speed, yada, yada, yada.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
580
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
526
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Wheels-Tires LS mii swap and rear rim size/axle questions....
  • 78mIIman
  • Feb 2, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
739
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 6, 2025
78 Mach1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?