• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

393 stroker, stock oil or aftermarket high volume

  • Thread starter Thread starter jae902
  • Start date Start date Sep 30, 2010
J

jae902

Member
Feb 11, 2003
175
0
16
Sep 30, 2010
#1
  • Sep 30, 2010
  • #1
I have a 67 mustang couple. So I'm trying to figure out if i can run a stock oil pan with my 393 stroker. Will that hold enough oil to keep it safe, especially if i use a high flow oil pump? The only reason why i would want to use the stock pan is because i plan to lower the engine 1/2" with the motor mounts, and i plan on lowering the car pretty low. Or are there any high volume oil pans that don't sit so low?
 
6

65coupe408w

Member
Mar 26, 2010
192
0
16
Sep 30, 2010
#2
  • Sep 30, 2010
  • #2
Hi,

I am running one of the Canton 7qt T-Pan Oil Pans on my 408w. I also have a 25% of stock volume oil pump. This is all in my 65 coupe which is lowered about an inch and the motor is on the Ron Morris adjustable mounts which I think lower the motor a little too. I have never had any clearnace issues with the pan, even on speed bumps. That said you can see it showing just under the front roll pan. If you want some pictures I can snap some tonight. I say get something like the T-Pan, the large capacity is always good for piece of mind. especially if you are making the motor work!
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Sep 30, 2010
#3
  • Sep 30, 2010
  • #3
65coupe408w said:
Hi,

I am running one of the Canton 7qt T-Pan Oil Pans on my 408w. I also have a 25% of stock volume oil pump. This is all in my 65 coupe which is lowered about an inch and the motor is on the Ron Morris adjustable mounts which I think lower the motor a little too. I have never had any clearnace issues with the pan, even on speed bumps. That said you can see it showing just under the front roll pan. If you want some pictures I can snap some tonight. I say get something like the T-Pan, the large capacity is always good for piece of mind. especially if you are making the motor work!
Click to expand...

Similar experience here with my Canton 7qt. I checked its depth before installation and it was nearly the same depth as the stock 69' pan. My motor is also lowered, right down to the round frame cross member.







 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Sep 30, 2010
#4
  • Sep 30, 2010
  • #4
I am using the Milodon version of the same pan. It also doesn't sit any lower, and the dipstick through the timing cover still works.

I am not a fan of high volume oil pumps, per se. Your oil passage clearances are what they are, and stock oil pumps do fine. Anything pumped beyond what your clearances flow just bypasses anyway.
 
J

jae902

Member
Feb 11, 2003
175
0
16
Sep 30, 2010
#5
  • Sep 30, 2010
  • #5
wow, thats not a big difference at all on the oil pan. Thanks for the help, i'll go with the canton oil pan (or other brands with similar dimensions). Can anyone else agree with MAX POWER about the high volume oil pump? If thats the case, then whats the point of getting a high flow oil pump if it doesn't make a difference.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Sep 30, 2010
#6
  • Sep 30, 2010
  • #6
Running a NON hi-volume on my 347 also. Last teardown to check the bottom end everything looked perfect. (8500+rpm thru the traps)

The other bad about the hivol is the added stress it puts on the shaft from the distributor to the oil pump. I was seeing 80-90psi with mine. Now I see about 50-60 at speed.
 
R

RatStang

New Member
Feb 11, 2010
544
0
0
Sep 30, 2010
#7
  • Sep 30, 2010
  • #7
jae902 said:
wow, thats not a big difference at all on the oil pan. Thanks for the help, i'll go with the canton oil pan (or other brands with similar dimensions). Can anyone else agree with MAX POWER about the high volume oil pump? If thats the case, then whats the point of getting a high flow oil pump if it doesn't make a difference.
Click to expand...


The primary purpose from what I gather, is for racing. Cars run continually at high rpm, circle track, etc. For a small block Ford, I've not seen a street application that REQUIRED anything more than a standard volume pump.

While on the subject though... I recently assisted a friend in removing a high volume pump from his 89 Fox (now my 89 Fox, more on that in a different thread). He'd been running that pump in a stock oil pan for roughly a year with no problems. It wasn't until he was roughly 2 hours into a long road trip that he noticed his oil pressure was dropping to what seemed to be a dangerously low level. He stopped, checked oil, everything looked fine, so he started back up and continued. 30 minutes later, the same thing. He cancelled the trip and returned home thinking that the pump was going to fail.

Come to find out that the oil pan was being emptied by the pump faster that the oil was returning to the pan. This occured once the oil was well heat saturated. We replaced the pump with a standard volume and he hasn't had the problem since.

Everything was being lubricated just fine. No damage to bearings, cam, rockers, rings or anything else. Just a low pressure indication when the oil pickup was able to intermittently grab air vs. oil.


I also run a 7 quart Miloden pan. I keep 5 to 6 quarts in it for windage. Standard volume oil pump. It works great.

I don't think the question is about whether or not you should run a standard volume pump. I think the question should be: "Do I NEED a high volume pump for my particular application. "

In almost all apps for a Ford small block on the street. I'd say that the answer is no.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
622
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
979
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
R
Starting my 1979 notch build
  • redneck15431
  • Dec 28, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
558
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2025
redneck15431
R
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?